edit Forum

barnum · Post by **barnum** » Mon Oct 24, 2011 2:02 pm

Edit: Pulled at request of LSAC

sportgirl234 · Post by **sportgirl234** » Mon Oct 24, 2011 2:02 pm

wait really??

FAJISTE · Post by **FAJISTE** » Mon Oct 24, 2011 2:02 pm

Scam?

xmrmckenziex · Post by **xmrmckenziex** » Mon Oct 24, 2011 2:03 pm

dietcoke0 · Post by **dietcoke0** » Mon Oct 24, 2011 2:03 pm

FAJISTE · Post by **FAJISTE** » Mon Oct 24, 2011 2:03 pm

You work for a company? Congrats.

JamMasterJ · Post by **JamMasterJ** » Mon Oct 24, 2011 2:04 pm

TrojanHopeful · Post by **TrojanHopeful** » Mon Oct 24, 2011 2:05 pm

dietcoke0 · Post by **dietcoke0** » Mon Oct 24, 2011 2:05 pm

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/s ... 0&sr=posts

No other misleading posts. I'll take as fact with grain of salt. Need something to get me through this day

941law · Post by **941law** » Mon Oct 24, 2011 2:06 pm

would read again.

FAJISTE · Post by **FAJISTE** » Mon Oct 24, 2011 2:06 pm

dietcoke0 wrote:http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/s ... 0&sr=posts

No other misleading posts. I'll take as fact with grain of salt. Need something to get me through this day

This is true.

senorhosh · Post by **senorhosh** » Mon Oct 24, 2011 2:07 pm

I've been looking at curve prediction threads. The curve has always been 1 above the score most voted for.
Oct's most vote for was -12. I'd say -13 sounds about right (but then again, it might just be mere coincidence)

dietcoke0 · Post by **dietcoke0** » Mon Oct 24, 2011 2:07 pm

941law wrote:would read again.

What do you see? I see him working for Griffon Prep., saying that for a year now.

barnum · Post by **barnum** » Mon Oct 24, 2011 2:08 pm

Yes, really. This is not spam. I work for a company called Griffon Prep http://www.griffonprep.com

Bernie · Post by **Bernie** » Mon Oct 24, 2011 2:08 pm

Um, Barnum has a serious professional reputation. He's not going to get on here and spam just to stress you all out. So calm down, he's doing you a favor.

JustSomebody · Post by **JustSomebody** » Mon Oct 24, 2011 2:13 pm

Man, I so want to believe.

Bildungsroman · Post by **Bildungsroman** » Mon Oct 24, 2011 2:15 pm

Bernie wrote:Um, Barnum has a serious professional reputation. He's not going to get on here and spam just to stress you all out. So calm down, he's doing you a favor.

I have trouble believing LSAC would license and release an unreleased LSAT without requiring that the person not talk about its contents publicly.

tanzie · Post by **tanzie** » Mon Oct 24, 2011 2:17 pm

Scam or not, I'm going to hope that this is true...however, I noticed that the predicted curve was -11 for the past 3 weeks, and only changed to -12 a couple of days ago (as we're nearing our anticipated score release and hoping for the best). Either way, good luck everyone!

WhiteGuy5 · Post by **WhiteGuy5** » Mon Oct 24, 2011 2:22 pm

I was almost going to believe it, but his bullshit edit gave him away.

He tried to make it more legit. Failed miserably. I don't think I did that well but I could tell the test was nowhere [edit: what he said it was.]

BeatenHorse · Post by **BeatenHorse** » Mon Oct 24, 2011 2:25 pm

Clever troll is clever. Very clever.

edit Forum

edit

Re: -13 for 170

Re: -13 for 170

Re: -13 for 170

Re: -13 for 170

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: -13 for 170

Re: -13 for 170

Re: -13 for 170

Re: -13 for 170

Register for access!

Re: -13 for 170

Re: -13 for 170

Re: -13 for 170

Re: -13 for 170

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

Re: -13 for 170

Re: -13 for 170

Re: -13 for 170

Re: -13 for 170

Register now!

Re: -13 for 170

Re: edit

Re: edit

Register now, it's still FREE!