Anybody have a good grasp between the difference? Out of scope: "it wasn't discussed, so no comparison can be made"... unsupported: "there is no evidence of this"
seems the same to me.
Interpretation(unsupported) vs scope (out of scope) Forum
- laxbrah420
- Posts: 2720
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 1:53 am
- tehrocstar
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 10:12 am
Re: Interpretation(unsupported) vs scope (out of scope)
Unsupported: through a combination of the existing premises you can not logically deduce the conclusion
Out of Scope: the element at hand is neither mentioned in the premises nor conclusion.
This can get you started, I'm sure others will have more input. There's some overlap between these two as well.
By the way, this is mostly with assumption based questions.
Out of Scope: the element at hand is neither mentioned in the premises nor conclusion.
This can get you started, I'm sure others will have more input. There's some overlap between these two as well.
By the way, this is mostly with assumption based questions.
Last edited by tehrocstar on Thu Sep 22, 2011 7:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- laxbrah420
- Posts: 2720
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 1:53 am
- SisterRayVU
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 12:56 pm
Re: Interpretation(unsupported) vs scope (out of scope)
Out of scope would be me talking about soccer being hard to play with one leg and mentioning baseball being easier than swimming with one ear.
Unsupported would be 'Yeah and baseball must be hard too!'
Unsupported would be 'Yeah and baseball must be hard too!'
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login