PT 18 (December 1992) Section 2 - #21 Forum

forps · Post by **forps** » Mon Jul 11, 2011 6:25 pm

I quite don't get this question. How does (A) strenghtens the position that the traditional attribution of a disputed painting should not have special weight?

Disputed paintings: Those without a signature or with a questionably authentic signature.

Any help is appreciated.

Manhattan LSAT Noah · Post by **Manhattan LSAT Noah** » Mon Jul 11, 2011 7:12 pm

Perhaps this discussion will help

forps · Post by **forps** » Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:35 pm

Manhattan LSAT Noah wrote:Perhaps this discussion will help

Thanks for the help.

I fully understood the question now.

Thanks again!

PT 18 (December 1992) Section 2 - #21 Forum

PT 18 (December 1992) Section 2 - #21

Re: PT 18 (December 1992) Section 2 - #21

Re: PT 18 (December 1992) Section 2 - #21