Quetion on obscure book Forum

[Ocean64]

I want honest opinions on a book called "Ace the LSAT Logic Games". I've been doing some games from it because i heard that it makes anything by LSAC seem easy. I know the consensus is that one should use only real games, but i was wondering if anyone gave this one a shot and if it helped at all.

[minnbills]

Not familiar with this one. Though I did use a Mcgraw-Hill LG book and it was a disaster. The games were poorly put together and there were some blatant mistakes. It hurt me for the October test, IMO. Maybe your book is much better, but I wouldn't recommend using anything other than actual LSAC-made questions.

[suspicious android]

Didn't Jeffort already give you a stern talking to about this? No simulated LSAT questions!

[Ocean64]

Didn't Jeffort already give you a stern talking to about this? No simulated LSAT questions!

indeed lol

[Bildungsroman]

That shit's obscure for a reason. If 60 PTs worth of real logic games isn't enough for you to get the hang of LG then nothing is.

[omninode]

That shit's obscure for a reason.

Seriously. Go with a name brand prep book (I always recommend the Powerscore bible but get whatever works for you) or no book at all.

[Ocean64]

That shit's obscure for a reason.

Seriously. Go with a name brand prep book (I always recommend the Powerscore bible but get whatever works for you) or no book at all.

i know, but i was just curios because it would be very convenient to do sections that i haven't seen and still not spoil full PTs I'd like to take at a later time.