All those scoring 170+ Forum
- glucose101
- Posts: 409
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 12:23 am
All those scoring 170+
I'm sure the answer is probably yes, but I thought I'd ask: When you're taking practice exams, do you feel like you're getting almost all the answers correct without hesitation, specifically LR/RC? Or do you feel like you're guessing on some questions (clearly not the majority of questions, but some)?
- AlabamaIceman
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 3:32 pm
Re: All those scoring 170+
On the few practice tests I scored over 170 on, I felt like I "guessed" on fewer than two or three questions, and those were all in logic games.glucose101 wrote:I'm sure the answer is probably yes, but I thought I'd ask: When you're taking practice exams, do you feel like you're getting almost all the answers correct without hesitation, specifically LR/RC? Or do you feel like you're guessing on some questions (clearly not the majority of questions, but some)?
- Magnolia
- Posts: 547
- Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 9:06 pm
Re: All those scoring 170+
I typically guessed 1-3 per LR/RC section. I never guessed on LG.
- incompetentia
- Posts: 2277
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm
Re: All those scoring 170+
Agree with above. If you're guessing on LG, you can improve still.
I think I was legitimately unsure of at least 1 per section otherwise, sometimes as many as 3-4 on RC.
I think I was legitimately unsure of at least 1 per section otherwise, sometimes as many as 3-4 on RC.
- avamango
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 8:36 am
Re: All those scoring 170+
Agree with the above. You should never miss a single point on LG.
RC can in many ways lead to definitively correct choices which means that you should aim to minimize guessing to about 2-4 questions.
Assuming that your LR sections are fairly accurate as they stand, as long as you don't find yourself guessing on more than 3-4 per section, you should be fine.
Therefore, if you guess on a total of [4 on RC] + [8 on LR] = 12 guessed-on questions.
Remember that even when you're guessing, there is an implicit assumption that you're making educated guesses; you should always be able to narrow every question down at least 1-2 answer choices.
Anyway, if you guess on 12 total and you get a few of those right while missing a few others that you thought you did in fact answer correctly, hopefully you'll be right around the 170 mark.
Then to get your score into the higher 170 range, focus on cleaning up the guesses on RC to 0-2 and work on 4 star questions in LR until you are guessing in the range of 0-3 per section.
RC can in many ways lead to definitively correct choices which means that you should aim to minimize guessing to about 2-4 questions.
Assuming that your LR sections are fairly accurate as they stand, as long as you don't find yourself guessing on more than 3-4 per section, you should be fine.
Therefore, if you guess on a total of [4 on RC] + [8 on LR] = 12 guessed-on questions.
Remember that even when you're guessing, there is an implicit assumption that you're making educated guesses; you should always be able to narrow every question down at least 1-2 answer choices.
Anyway, if you guess on 12 total and you get a few of those right while missing a few others that you thought you did in fact answer correctly, hopefully you'll be right around the 170 mark.
Then to get your score into the higher 170 range, focus on cleaning up the guesses on RC to 0-2 and work on 4 star questions in LR until you are guessing in the range of 0-3 per section.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Can'texplainthat
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2011 1:30 am
Re: All those scoring 170+
irrelevant post
Last edited by Can'texplainthat on Thu Jun 23, 2011 1:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
- glucose101
- Posts: 409
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 12:23 am
Re: All those scoring 170+
In my post, I guess I tried to focus on RC/LR because I feel like LG has strictly provable answers. Don't get me wrong, I understand that RC/LR can be proved, but not in the same way LG can. Perhaps I'm just not at the level where they (RC/LR) seem like it?
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 6:37 pm
Re: All those scoring 170+
...
Last edited by tng11 on Thu Jan 05, 2012 10:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
- joebloe
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2010 6:02 am
Re: All those scoring 170+
On PTs where I've broken 170, I've always felt pretty confident at the end of each section. But do I feel like there's no hesitation? No not necessarily; there definitely can be questions I'll vacillate between answer choices on, or ones I'll skip and come back to finish. But upon review of my wrong answers, I notice that most of my incorrect answers are typically due to boneheaded mistakes, where I could have easily gotten the credited response.
I don't know if I'd necessarily use such gut instincts to plan a cancel on a real test though. It's just... there's something different about going into the real deal. Even if you're taking proctored PTs, there's just something different.
I don't know if I'd necessarily use such gut instincts to plan a cancel on a real test though. It's just... there's something different about going into the real deal. Even if you're taking proctored PTs, there's just something different.
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:57 am
Re: All those scoring 170+
Hm, I've only scored 170+ on four practice tests (out of about 15 total) and I usually didn't feel much more different than when I scored upper 160s.
I always felt confident on logic games, but on RC/LR I could never accurately gauge how I was doing. With RC, I struggled with time. So if I finished a section completely, I felt that I had done pretty well. With LR, I rarely guessed, but on every section there were a few questions I felt uncomfortable with (maybe you consider this guessing). I also struggled a bit with time on LR, so if I was very rushed at the end of a section, I expected to underperform.
I'm kind of rambling, but I guess on my 170+ practice tests, time wasn't an issue. I may have still thought the test was hard, but I had enough time to adequately answer every question. With my tests below 170, I usually ran out of time on at least one section.
Good luck
I always felt confident on logic games, but on RC/LR I could never accurately gauge how I was doing. With RC, I struggled with time. So if I finished a section completely, I felt that I had done pretty well. With LR, I rarely guessed, but on every section there were a few questions I felt uncomfortable with (maybe you consider this guessing). I also struggled a bit with time on LR, so if I was very rushed at the end of a section, I expected to underperform.
I'm kind of rambling, but I guess on my 170+ practice tests, time wasn't an issue. I may have still thought the test was hard, but I had enough time to adequately answer every question. With my tests below 170, I usually ran out of time on at least one section.
Good luck

- puppylaw
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 1:53 pm
Re: All those scoring 170+
I guessed, or at least wasn't absolutely certain, quite a bit. However, I would almost always be able to narrow the possible choices down to two. There's nothing wrong with not knowing for sure. Do the best you can quickly, pick the best answer, and move on.
- cmckid
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 11:22 pm
Re: All those scoring 170+
I keep track using my own system. QUestions I'm 100% about I mark with a 0, 90% I mark with a 1, less than that I write a star, and below 50% I mark with a 2.
I was scoring between 172-179 on my practice tests and I'd usually end up with about 5 1s, 4-10 stars, and 1 2. I would usually get all but 1 1 correct, and hit about 50-75% of my stars.
I was scoring between 172-179 on my practice tests and I'd usually end up with about 5 1s, 4-10 stars, and 1 2. I would usually get all but 1 1 correct, and hit about 50-75% of my stars.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login