Curve Prediction June 2011 Forum
- handlesthetruth
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 4:42 pm
Curve Prediction June 2011
Thoughts and feelings on the 170 curve.
- vissidarte27
- Posts: 434
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:43 pm
Re: curve prediction
I hate to say it, but I'm not feeling more than -10 on this one. LR was really easy, there was only one really hard LG (IMO), and one really hard RC passage. I was surprised by how quickly the whole thing flew by. (And watch, it probably fucked me in the ass.)
I said -9. Blech.
I said -9. Blech.
- baconpuffs
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:18 pm
Re: Curve Prediction June 2011
Once again, I thought on balance LR was about average, RC was moderately difficult, and LG was fairly easy. Taking the easy way out and going with -10.
- gggrra
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 8:26 pm
Re: Curve Prediction June 2011
I would have said that LR was slightly on the easy side. And I have a bad feeling about how I did on the RC mostly b/c my mind lost focus at that moment (that and the brass musician warming up in the background...) bleh.baconpuffs wrote:Once again, I thought on balance LR was about average, RC was moderately difficult, and LG was fairly easy. Taking the easy way out and going with -10.
agreed. still hoping for a -11, though.
- gggrra
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 8:26 pm
Re: Curve Prediction June 2011
Just a thought: PT 57-62 have curves from -11 to -14 (if I'm not mistaken) and none of them were really that difficult (with the exception of mauve dinosaurs?). So I'm gonna guess it's probably not -9, and more likely to be -10 or -11.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- handlesthetruth
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 4:42 pm
Re: Curve Prediction June 2011
I would be shocked if it's -10 or less.
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:26 pm
Re: Curve Prediction June 2011
I think it'll be about average. However, hoping 170 will be more than -10. Ugh.
- baconpuffs
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:18 pm
Re: Curve Prediction June 2011
prediction: two "not both" rules in LG would have confused previous test takers, since those rules are fairly new. this makes the LG section curved favorably.
discuss.
discuss.
- gggrra
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 8:26 pm
Re: Curve Prediction June 2011
eh. that one was difficult, but the fact the the first two were so easy could offset it? Also all this talk of balls makes me paranoid because I thought it was fairly easy... -_-baconpuffs wrote:prediction: two "not both" rules in LG would have confused previous test takers, since those rules are fairly new. this makes the LG section curved favorably.
discuss.
- handlesthetruth
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 4:42 pm
Re: Curve Prediction June 2011
.
Last edited by handlesthetruth on Tue Jun 07, 2011 7:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
- baconpuffs
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:18 pm
Re: Curve Prediction June 2011
+1handlesthetruth wrote:gggrra wrote:eh. that one was difficult, but the fact the the first two were so easy could offset it? Also all this talk of balls makes me paranoid because I thought it was fairly easy... -_-baconpuffs wrote:prediction: two "not both" rules in LG would have confused previous test takers, since those rules are fairly new. this makes the LG section curved favorably.
discuss.
I thought balls was cake.
- omninode
- Posts: 405
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:09 pm
Re: Curve Prediction June 2011
I say -10, maybe -9. Seemed a little easier than October 2010 (-12).
LG was easier than expected but I got too relaxed, ran out of time and had to guess a few at the end.
RC was surprisingly hard, probably didn't help that it was section 5 and I was kinda burned out. Still, I finished it with time to spare and only 1 or 2 uncertain answers.
LG was easier than expected but I got too relaxed, ran out of time and had to guess a few at the end.
RC was surprisingly hard, probably didn't help that it was section 5 and I was kinda burned out. Still, I finished it with time to spare and only 1 or 2 uncertain answers.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- cmckid
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 11:22 pm
Re: Curve Prediction June 2011
From what I can tell, people were uniformly freaked out by Logic Games and RC. I'm predicting. I went through some older tests that I took and found some ones around that level that seemed even easier than this one did.
-
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 5:58 pm
Re: Curve Prediction June 2011
.
Last edited by plurilingue on Sun Aug 04, 2013 6:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 10:58 pm
Re: Curve Prediction June 2011
Does LSAC have a goal for curve?
- Hawkeye Pierce
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:18 am
Re: Curve Prediction June 2011
I think it's to normalise the scores, so that a 170 in June 2011, e.g., is the same as a 170 from June 2010.sunrat wrote:Does LSAC have a goal for curve?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- joebloe
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2010 6:02 am
Re: Curve Prediction June 2011
Yeah; I skipped ahead to balls after that other one because I just couldn't wrap my mind around those odd rules at that point. By the time I finished balls though, I had enough time left to manage and at least get glimpses of the crucial deductions.gggrra wrote:eh. that one was difficult, but the fact the the first two were so easy could offset it? Also all this talk of balls makes me paranoid because I thought it was fairly easy... -_-baconpuffs wrote:prediction: two "not both" rules in LG would have confused previous test takers, since those rules are fairly new. this makes the LG section curved favorably.
discuss.
- pkrtbx
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 11:11 am
Re: Curve Prediction June 2011
me too, and now I'm scared. LG has always been my weakness...did I miss something AHHHhandlesthetruth wrote:gggrra wrote:eh. that one was difficult, but the fact the the first two were so easy could offset it? Also all this talk of balls makes me paranoid because I thought it was fairly easy... -_-baconpuffs wrote:prediction: two "not both" rules in LG would have confused previous test takers, since those rules are fairly new. this makes the LG section curved favorably.
discuss.
I thought balls was cake.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login