Review the June LSAT Online Forum

[Manhattan LSAT Noah]

We're hosting a free live online workshop to review the June LSAT. Monday, July 11th - 9pm ET.

If you want to geek out, join us.

[JamMasterJ]

We're hosting a free live online workshop to review the June LSAT. Monday, July 11th - 9pm ET.

If you want to geek out, join us.

Will you be posting the questions? Not sure if that would be legal..?

[cvntstscrty]

LSAC’s “Instructions for the Day of the Test” state: “Legal action may be taken against anyone who removes test materials and/or reproduces test material in any way, or shares LSAT test content prior to LSAC’s disclosure of that test.”

Caveon Test Security is a test security vendor for LSAC.

[AntipodeanPhil]

LSAC’s “Instructions for the Day of the Test” state: “Legal action may be taken against anyone who removes test materials and/or reproduces test material in any way, or shares LSAT test content prior to LSAC’s disclosure of that test.”

Caveon Test Security is a test security vendor for LSAC.

LOL. Didn't Manhattan LSAT Noah pick the July date because it is AFTER LSAC's disclosure of the test. This seems to be about the only thread on the TLS LSAT forum that doesn't violate LSAC's instructions. Good job, Caveon person / automated robot.

[JamMasterJ]

I think any combination of the words post, LSAT and questions gets an auto response from Caveon. This is getting a little ridiculous when I was simply trying to see whether it would be worthwhile for a non-June taker to show up to this

[chasy_price]

Will be there Noah. Will be there.

[Manhattan LSAT Noah]

Just to clarify, we keep it legal (post score-release, within confines of our agreement with LSAC). Participate without fear of retribution or guilt.

[JamMasterJ]

I might sit in, even though I didn't take it. I plan to do the PT after in like September or something so I'm not sure if I'll want to see it beforehand

[johnnn782]

So we will actually be able to discuss specific questions? I just have a few on that damn rock/magnet passage.

[Manhattan LSAT Noah]

Yes, we'll look at some questions, however, because of the nature of group dynamics, we'll choose which ones to review. I'm sorry if we end up not doing the ones you have a vendetta against (though feel free to make some suggestions for us, though after the release date, please).

This is designed for folks who took the test, FYI.

[JamMasterJ]

Yes, we'll look at some questions, however, because of the nature of group dynamics, we'll choose which ones to review. I'm sorry if we end up not doing the ones you have a vendetta against (though feel free to make some suggestions for us, though after the release date, please).

This is designed for folks who took the test, FYI.

I figured. I'm just an uber-LSAT geek

[johnnn782]

Ok ill be there. Also, I had LR for sections 1,3, and 4. Is there any way to tell which was experimental?

[Manhattan LSAT Noah]

There's one live LR section before the break, and one after. As for differentiating between the two pre-break, LSAC prefers you not talk with others about the content of the questions until everyone has had time to decide whether to cancel, though I imagine people do end up discussing - at their own risk of death

[johnnn782]

Is there anywhere to safely discuss certain problems that appeared on the lsat before the release date, via chat perhaps?

[JamMasterJ]

Is there anywhere to safely discuss certain problems that appeared on the lsat before the release date, via chat perhaps?

Not legally

[Manhattan LSAT Noah]

bump. Now you actually care about this LSAT again!

[Audio Technica Guy]

Is there anywhere to safely discuss certain problems that appeared on the lsat before the release date, via chat perhaps?

Not legally

Actually this isn't really true. It's not illegal to discuss LSAT problems. You can discuss copyrighted things all you want. You can't republish them, which is part of the issue with posting them on a website (though the bigger issue is just that websites don't want to even bother with litigation, as LSAC typically has more money than they do.

LSAC likes to try to pretend it's illegal to even talk about them, but its just not. That would never hold up in a court of law. If I write a book, I can, in no way, shape or form sue you because you talked about it. Now, they could revoke your score if they caught you, that's completely within their rights, though I'd imagine that you could probably get an injunction against LSAC for doing that.

I've always found it kind of funny that LSAC puts all this stuff in their LSAT that they 100% know wouldn't hold up legally.

edit: well, I could sue you, but I'd never win for discussing my book in the hypo above. That's part of the issue here though. LSAC could sue, even though they know they'd lose. They essentially bully websites like this with the threat of litigation.