voice of reason wrote:I remember seeing this when I was studying for the LSAT. It irked me then and it irks me now, because it's sheer nonsense and a misuse of statistics. It's the equivalent of saying that a coin that came up heads 55 times in the last 100 flips is more likely to come up heads on the next one. That's just not true, and they should know better.
The LSAT answer letters are assigned randomly. That they have deviated a little from the expected probability distribution in the past does not imply that they will deviate the same way in the future.
So if you've run out of time and need to fill bubbles, guess however you want. It doesn't matter. Don't waste time memorizing which letter was "best" for which section in the past.
/rant
You don't actually know that they are randomly assigned though. Order of options might be part of the difficulty of the question. A brute force solution works better if it's A than if it's D. So there could be a reason why there is a slight deviation.