Let's say there are two people who have never before studied for the LSAT. Both of them take an LSAT diagnostic exam, and they achieve different scores.
Why is that? Why do some people do drastically better on their diagnostic exam, and hence, need to spend less time studying for the LSAT?
Do you think it's IQ or prior reading experience?
Diagnostic Test Forum
- risktaker
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 3:10 pm
Re: Diagnostic Test
Ability to read fast and absorb material quicker.
- incompetentia
- Posts: 2277
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm
Re: Diagnostic Test
Partially the way your mind works (maybe not aptitude, but more of your natural thought process), partially prior experiences. Each case is different.
There are LG-like puzzles that are sometimes given to kids, for example, or there are people who have never picked up reading material that's as dense as some RC passages are.
EDIT: Also, timing, like the above post.
There are LG-like puzzles that are sometimes given to kids, for example, or there are people who have never picked up reading material that's as dense as some RC passages are.
EDIT: Also, timing, like the above post.
-
- Posts: 446
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 9:33 pm
- bport hopeful
- Posts: 4930
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:09 pm
Re: Diagnostic Test
Natural intelligence?
- tyro
- Posts: 643
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 2:23 am
Re: Diagnostic Test
+1
Nice research too with your post in the thread you linked.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login