A Good Supply of Fake Logic Games Forum

[AntipodeanPhil]

Can anyone recommend a good supply of fake (i.e., non-LSAC produced) logic games? I'm burning through the LSAC games, but still having trouble with time. I've already done the Examkrackers games, and started on the LSAT Blog games.

[lovejopd]

I think you can re-do games that gave you trouble. LG is the easiest section for me. The speed would go up as you are accustomed to setting up the game.

[Easy-E]

I think you can re-do games that gave you trouble. LG is the easiest section for me. The speed would go up as you are accustomed to setting up the game.

Manhattan LSAT has some good games on there, but obviously you want to use the real ones primarily. LSAT Blog one's are good too, they usually mirror another actual game pretty closely.

[AntipodeanPhil]

Manhattan LSAT has some good games on there, but obviously you want to use the real ones primarily. LSAT Blog one's are good too, they usually mirror another actual game pretty closely.

I got a PM about the Manhattan LSAT games. They do seem helpful. I like that they're easy to print out. I think they're a bit more difficult than the average LSAC produced game, but that's probably a good thing.

[OhOkay]

Steve Schwartz's blog also has some, but one or two of them were crazy tough in a way that I don't think would appear on the test -- I couldn't think of a way to do them without literally doing a million templates/hypothetical and taking over 10 minutes, at least. I think the comments on the posts agreed.

MLSAT's logic games are also tougher than average actual LSAT games, but they tend to be good for pointing out achilles' heels that may only rarely get tested but are good to be prepared for, like unwarranted assumptions that we sometimes make about how to distribute elements, etc. I've only done a few, but I think they strengthened my ability to make inferences.

[Easy-E]

Steve Schwartz's blog also has some, but one or two of them were crazy tough in a way that I don't think would appear on the test -- I couldn't think of a way to do them without literally doing a million templates/hypothetical and taking over 10 minutes, at least. I think the comments on the posts agreed.

MLSAT's logic games are also tougher than average actual LSAT games, but they tend to be good for pointing out achilles' heels that may only rarely get tested but are good to be prepared for, like unwarranted assumptions that we sometimes make about how to distribute elements, etc. I've only done a few, but I think they strengthened my ability to make inferences.

Yeah, Steve's stuff is great but the grouping game with the Hindu deities and the templates one were both nightmares for me.