12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR Forum
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 7:56 pm
12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
Did anybody else get an experimental LR in section 4? Yes or no.
I believe I did and I would love to know if anybody else did. I do not want to hijack anyone elses thread so I am making this one.
I believe I did and I would love to know if anybody else did. I do not want to hijack anyone elses thread so I am making this one.
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:28 pm
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
edited: I meant the third
Had 3 LRs, and my experimental was the third
Had 3 LRs, and my experimental was the third
Last edited by LawPlz on Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:01 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 7:56 pm
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
thanks. I believe I fucked up. I convinced myself the 4th section was experimental while I was taking it and didn't fully concentrate. The questions were so weird. Goldfish mating and shit. Tons of questions that don't fit the traditional mold of LR. oh well. there is always february.
- m1 a1
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
I had 3 LR sections and I don't remember anything regard goldfish to be honest.
-
- Posts: 531
- Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 2:18 am
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
someone correct me if i'm wrong, but i believe every single experimental thus far has been in the first 3 sections, so unless they decided to change it up this year, i can't see how you'd have a section 4 experimental anything
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:22 pm
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 7:56 pm
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
LR
RC
LR
LR
LG
12/11/10- Satan's LSAT
RC
LR
LR
LG
12/11/10- Satan's LSAT
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:28 pm
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
LR RC LR LR LGSchopenhauerFTW wrote:What was your test distribution?LawPlz wrote:Had 3 LRs, and my experimental was the first.
shit sorry, I meant my experimental was the 3rd LR. I wish it was the first, just wishful thinking on my part I guess

-
- Posts: 531
- Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 2:18 am
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
i have a feeling you and i had the same setup, from what i gathered, there's actually 2 different forms that had LR RC LR LR LG, and the one i had the section 3 LR had 25 questions only (which i believe is the experimental). I too had thought I did considerably worse on the section 1 LR and prayed that it was the experimental, but everyone else who didn't have an LR experimental has said the 2 LR's had 26 questions, so...yea there it isLawPlz wrote:LR RC LR LR LGSchopenhauerFTW wrote:What was your test distribution?LawPlz wrote:Had 3 LRs, and my experimental was the first.
shit sorry, I meant my experimental was the 3rd LR. I wish it was the first, just wishful thinking on my part I guess
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:28 pm
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
Yeah, the third LR I had only had 25 questions. I thought for sure that meant the first LR was experimental since it had 26 questions (making the test total 102), but I was wrong since both LRs were apparently out of 26.lsatextreme wrote:i have a feeling you and i had the same setup, from what i gathered, there's actually 2 different forms that had LR RC LR LR LG, and the one i had the section 3 LR had 25 questions only (which i believe is the experimental). I too had thought I did considerably worse on the section 1 LR and prayed that it was the experimental, but everyone else who didn't have an LR experimental has said the 2 LR's had 26 questions, so...yea there it isLawPlz wrote:LR RC LR LR LGSchopenhauerFTW wrote:What was your test distribution?LawPlz wrote:Had 3 LRs, and my experimental was the first.
shit sorry, I meant my experimental was the 3rd LR. I wish it was the first, just wishful thinking on my part I guess
-
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:22 pm
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 7:56 pm
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
You're awesome. Thank you for clarifying this!
- 2011L1
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 3:33 pm
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
did you have rc-lr-lr-lg-lr?LawPlz wrote:edited: I meant the third
Had 3 LRs, and my experimental was the third
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- m1 a1
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
Ouch that hurts. I thought the LR experimental was really easy, and I didn't do as well on the 1st LR.SchopenhauerFTW wrote:Yep.
LR - 26
RC - 27
LR - 25
LR - 26
LG - 23
It was a 102 question test.
Section 3 (2nd LR) was the experimental in this distribution.
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:59 pm
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
I had the same setup except all 3 of my LR sections had 26 questions. Is the
mad at me? lol
LR-26
RC-27
LR-26
LR-26
LG-23
Anyone else have this set up. I cant really remember specific ?'s from the LR didnt find any of the especially odd but I do feel better about the last 2.
Help!

LR-26
RC-27
LR-26
LR-26
LG-23
Anyone else have this set up. I cant really remember specific ?'s from the LR didnt find any of the especially odd but I do feel better about the last 2.
Help!

- Neidermeyer519
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:20 am
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
I had the same setup and distinctly remember the first being the hardest. Something about it felt off, so I'm hoping that is my subconscience telling me it was the experimental. lol.
- gmenfan
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 10:04 pm
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
I had the 3x26 as well, and from what I've read, it seems like the 2nd was experi
.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 2:40 pm
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
I took the same LSAT and my exp. section was section 1 (which was LR).
I had the same set-up as most people on this blog (with three LR sections) but If I counted my first section, I ended up with 103 questions as opposed to 102.
I am pretty sure the first section was the experiment; it was also the hardest.
I had the same set-up as most people on this blog (with three LR sections) but If I counted my first section, I ended up with 103 questions as opposed to 102.
I am pretty sure the first section was the experiment; it was also the hardest.
- Jader
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 5:24 pm
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
LR RC LR (exp) LR LG; all LR 26 questions, 100% sure.
I didn't know the experimental was before the break and I didn't know I had another LR section, but I was confident that my third section was experimental like 15 questions in. It just seemed completely out of order and obscenely difficult.
I didn't know the experimental was before the break and I didn't know I had another LR section, but I was confident that my third section was experimental like 15 questions in. It just seemed completely out of order and obscenely difficult.
- AnthonyNicator
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 6:46 pm
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
how are you certain that the third (26) was the experimental, and not the first (25) which would give us 101?
-
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 11:06 pm
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
It seems to have been pretty well confirmed that the # of questions is 102. I had 3 LRs as well, and they were all 26 questions, so 102 has to be the total.
-
- Posts: 919
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 2:32 pm
Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR
I had
LR
RC
LR
LR
LG
The first LR was rough. The second one was ok, but the third one I believe I mastered. I was REALLY hoping that the 1st one was experimental.
LR
RC
LR
LR
LG
The first LR was rough. The second one was ok, but the third one I believe I mastered. I was REALLY hoping that the 1st one was experimental.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login