June 2007: What was with that ridiculous curve? Forum
-
- Posts: 882
- Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 10:50 pm
June 2007: What was with that ridiculous curve?
I am retaking in Dec and my last 4 PTs, have been a Raw Score of 87,87,89, 89 which all scaled to 168. Today I take the June 2007, test and get a 164 with a raw score of 85/100. Wtf? Was that test really that easy and I just missed easy questions? Should I be worried with December coming up so soon? I need a 167+ at the very least
-
- Posts: 151
- Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 7:55 pm
Re: June 2007: What was with that ridiculous curve?
No don't be worried. That test really punished you if you were complacent or didn't read super carefully. That was my worst PT as well, but try and learn a lesson from each of those 15 mistakes. Forget the curve.
- yzero1
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 4:33 pm
Re: June 2007: What was with that ridiculous curve?
This was also my one of my worst PTs and its curve did seem quite ridiculous considering its difficulty. Not sure if this applies to you, but this was also the first comparative passage I did, so my lack of familiarity with the RC style may have explained my below-average performance on RC specifically. Don't worry if you scored below your average though - this was certainly an unusual test.
- niederbomb
- Posts: 962
- Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 12:07 pm
Re: June 2007: What was with that ridiculous curve?
Just took this test. I went -2 RC, -1 LR, -1 LR, and then a whopping -6 on LG.
I hope that LG was exceptionally hard. That digits game at the beginning was ridiculous.
I hope that LG was exceptionally hard. That digits game at the beginning was ridiculous.
-
- Posts: 882
- Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 10:50 pm
Re: June 2007: What was with that ridiculous curve?
I went perfect on that LG, but went -9 on LR and -6 on RC 
the digits game was tough to wrap your head around but once you did, it was actually really easy, you knew the first two digits either were 2-4 or 1-2, then after that you could write out the possibilities

the digits game was tough to wrap your head around but once you did, it was actually really easy, you knew the first two digits either were 2-4 or 1-2, then after that you could write out the possibilities
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 5:59 pm
Re: June 2007: What was with that ridiculous curve?
Yeah, I got a raw score of 83/100 and was bitterly disappointed by the final number. Also, the RC section was noticeably harder than usual.SupraVln180 wrote:I am retaking in Dec and my last 4 PTs, have been a Raw Score of 87,87,89, 89 which all scaled to 168. Today I take the June 2007, test and get a 164 with a raw score of 85/100. Wtf? Was that test really that easy and I just missed easy questions? Should I be worried with December coming up so soon? I need a 167+ at the very least
-
- Posts: 963
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 12:23 am
Re: June 2007: What was with that ridiculous curve?
are u serious? the digits game is the easiest game in LSAT history. u just make 2 diff sketches, and it should take u 4 minutes or less. if u struggled on this one, rethink december.SupraVln180 wrote:I went perfect on that LG, but went -9 on LR and -6 on RC
the digits game was tough to wrap your head around but once you did, it was actually really easy, you knew the first two digits either were 2-4 or 1-2, then after that you could write out the possibilities
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:10 pm
Re: June 2007: What was with that ridiculous curve?
<flashback to June 2007 which was my actual LSAT>
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 10:42 pm
Re: June 2007: What was with that ridiculous curve?
So happy to see this post . . .
I just took this PT and got -0 LG, -1 RC, -3 LR . . . FOR A 174! Wtf ... Frustrating. I guess it is the curve.
I just took this PT and got -0 LG, -1 RC, -3 LR . . . FOR A 174! Wtf ... Frustrating. I guess it is the curve.
- northwood
- Posts: 5036
- Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 7:29 pm
Re: June 2007: What was with that ridiculous curve?
dont worry about the curve. Focus on the raw score. You have no idea what the curve will be in December, but you should have an idea what your raw scoring range should be. Use that as a guide.
- hallbd16
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 12:40 pm
Re: June 2007: What was with that ridiculous curve?
Forum seafaring. Needed this comment. Thanks.northwood wrote:dont worry about the curve. Focus on the raw score. You have no idea what the curve will be in December, but you should have an idea what your raw scoring range should be. Use that as a guide.
- arcanecircle
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 12:33 am
Re: June 2007: What was with that ridiculous curve?
I felt the same way about that game, I was freaking out at first then realized how easy it was. Someone should compile a list of the weirdest games they've thrown in there. My personal favorite is PT10 Game #3, total tribute to Lewis CarollSupraVln180 wrote:I went perfect on that LG, but went -9 on LR and -6 on RC
the digits game was tough to wrap your head around but once you did, it was actually really easy, you knew the first two digits either were 2-4 or 1-2, then after that you could write out the possibilities

- CyanIdes Of March
- Posts: 700
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 1:57 pm
Re: June 2007: What was with that ridiculous curve?
PT 12, Game 4 was the easiest game I've ever done. It's more or less how well can you follow simple instructions. Once you apply all the rules the questions are basically just "What is this plus this?". Takes ~3 minutes.arcanecircle wrote:I felt the same way about that game, I was freaking out at first then realized how easy it was. Someone should compile a list of the weirdest games they've thrown in there. My personal favorite is PT10 Game #3, total tribute to Lewis CarollSupraVln180 wrote:I went perfect on that LG, but went -9 on LR and -6 on RC
the digits game was tough to wrap your head around but once you did, it was actually really easy, you knew the first two digits either were 2-4 or 1-2, then after that you could write out the possibilities
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login