Hey guys,
Two weeks ago I bought the Cambridge Difficult LR set. I consistently get 5 out of 10 wrong doing its questions untimed. My LR average with actual practice tests timed is -6, -8 usually, which means I'm not clear with some LR concepts (esp. Assumption qs and parallel reasoning). You think doing Cambridge set is helpful at this point (Dec taker)? Thanks!
Cambridge LR- to do or not to do? Forum
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 12:42 am
Re: Cambridge LR- to do or not to do?
I feel like assumption questions are the easiest. All you have to do is "connect" 2 bits of information (premise and conclusion?) and this works nearly every single time. I never bought the cambridge difficult LR set but if you're unsure on specific concepts maybe you should focus on those first? -6 isn't bad (-3 per LR section?). If you're missing the difficult questions I guess the difficult LR set could help but I think PTs and reviewing those thoroughly helps more than anything.
- MdmMoisel
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 6:04 am
Re: Cambridge LR- to do or not to do?
Thanks gerbal! No, I'm missing -6 per LR section!! When doing individual timed sections I usually get -2 or -3, but with a complete PT, it's another story. Assmpt and Parallel Reas. are by far the most intimidating Q types for me. Thanks for your advice..I don't think I've time for Cambridge set anymore 

- catsparka
- Posts: 267
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 4:50 pm
Re: Cambridge LR- to do or not to do?
I did the difficult LR questions. They were pretty helpful, but I made sure not to touch them as test week approached, because they can really kill your confidence.
- MdmMoisel
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 6:04 am
Re: Cambridge LR- to do or not to do?
Yeah you're right.
-
- Posts: 870
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 8:36 pm
Re: Cambridge LR- to do or not to do?
Especially assumptions with causal conclusions. Find whatever denies a possible alternate cause or establishes the cause-effect relationship.gerbal wrote:I feel like assumption questions are the easiest. All you have to do is "connect" 2 bits of information (premise and conclusion?) and this works nearly every single time. I never bought the cambridge difficult LR set but if you're unsure on specific concepts maybe you should focus on those first? -6 isn't bad (-3 per LR section?). If you're missing the difficult questions I guess the difficult LR set could help but I think PTs and reviewing those thoroughly helps more than anything.
For assumptions find the "rogue" elements (gaps) and just link them. For flaw, point out the rogue elements. They used to give me a ton of toruble but not so much anymore.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login