. Forum
- leidice
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 11:05 am
Re: Official Oct. 2010 Reverse LSAT Splitters
I'm very close to where you are... GPA: 3.96, LSAT scores: 157 June '10, 151 Oct '10. I already have my LOR and everything ready to go, as my PT were in 162-168 range. I have absolutely no idea what I'm supposed to do now. My boyfriend suggested taking an internship or job with the Atty Gen in my state for some WE before I apply again, but what does this mean for the LOR my professors have already sent in for me?
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:41 pm
Re: Official Oct. 2010 Reverse LSAT Splitters
Same boat.
LSAC GPA: 3.9 (Ivy)
LSATs: Dec 09 - 164, June 10 - cancel, Oct 10 - 165
Good softs and 4 LORs
Really hoping for Georgetown or possibly Berkeley or Cornell. Know I can get into GWU, as I actually applied last cycle and got in there with just the 164 (and was "preferred waitlisted" at Georgetown last year). Not sure what to do next...just apply, or petition for one more retake in December. Applying late definitely hurt me last year. Thoughts? Thanks!
LSAC GPA: 3.9 (Ivy)
LSATs: Dec 09 - 164, June 10 - cancel, Oct 10 - 165
Good softs and 4 LORs
Really hoping for Georgetown or possibly Berkeley or Cornell. Know I can get into GWU, as I actually applied last cycle and got in there with just the 164 (and was "preferred waitlisted" at Georgetown last year). Not sure what to do next...just apply, or petition for one more retake in December. Applying late definitely hurt me last year. Thoughts? Thanks!
-
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:28 pm
Re: Official Oct. 2010 Reverse LSAT Splitters
154, 3.93. I AM SCREWED. Come on uconn please please please take me.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 6:36 pm
Re: Official Oct. 2010 Reverse LSAT Splitters
Petition for a retake. There's the guy who took the LSAT 7 times to get a 171 and got in everywhere (except H and S I believe). You have nothing to lose. If you're aggressive enough to give yourself another shot to get a score you want, you shouldn't feel bad or think twice about it.
mehs wrote:Same boat.
LSAC GPA: 3.9 (Ivy)
LSATs: Dec 09 - 164, June 10 - cancel, Oct 10 - 165
Good softs and 4 LORs
Really hoping for Georgetown or possibly Berkeley or Cornell. Know I can get into GWU, as I actually applied last cycle and got in there with just the 164 (and was "preferred waitlisted" at Georgetown last year). Not sure what to do next...just apply, or petition for one more retake in December. Applying late definitely hurt me last year. Thoughts? Thanks!
- akili
- Posts: 1950
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:21 pm
Re: Official Oct. 2010 Reverse LSAT Splitters
LSAT: 160
GPA: 3.7
Hoping for: UC-Boulder and Wake Forest are some of my top choices. Also hoping I might sneak in to UW...Not retaking.
GPA: 3.7
Hoping for: UC-Boulder and Wake Forest are some of my top choices. Also hoping I might sneak in to UW...Not retaking.
-
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:28 pm
Re: Official Oct. 2010 Reverse LSAT Splitters
Graduating soon with a lot of debt, can't find a job, and I got an LSAT score that a monkey could get. Wow, what the hell do I do? UCONN was always high on my list, but it looks like I have no shot in hell there.
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 10:47 pm
Re: Official Oct. 2010 Reverse LSAT Splitters
4.0/163. I'm five points below pt average. Retake is possible, but considering WUSTL and hoping for Vandy.
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 8:38 pm
Re: Official Oct. 2010 Reverse LSAT Splitters
LSAC GPA: 3.96
LSAT: 159
I am devastated because my PT average was 10 points higher than my score.. Retaking will majorly interrupt my life and probably bring my GPA down, but I don't think I can apply to schools with a 159, knowing I can do so much better.
Anyone else who can retake but is hesitant to register??
LSAT: 159

I am devastated because my PT average was 10 points higher than my score.. Retaking will majorly interrupt my life and probably bring my GPA down, but I don't think I can apply to schools with a 159, knowing I can do so much better.
Anyone else who can retake but is hesitant to register??
-
- Posts: 223
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 5:22 am
Re: Official Oct. 2010 Reverse LSAT Splitters
So you're saying he got into CCN despite taking it 7 times? What was his lowest?bruin10 wrote:Petition for a retake. There's the guy who took the LSAT 7 times to get a 171 and got in everywhere (except H and S I believe). You have nothing to lose. If you're aggressive enough to give yourself another shot to get a score you want, you shouldn't feel bad or think twice about it.
I have a legit excuse for my painfully low score, but I am still somewhat worried that it's a huge mark against me.
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:00 am
Re: Official Oct. 2010 Reverse LSAT Splitters
...
Last edited by eve2490 on Sat Oct 22, 2011 7:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 2:01 pm
Re: Official Oct. 2010 Reverse LSAT Splitters
170/4.04 GPA. Any chance for Columbia, NYU, or Stanford? 

Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:41 pm
Re: Official Oct. 2010 Reverse LSAT Splitters
I'd say you definitely have a shot, depending on your softs and LORs (and if your 4.04 GPA is LSAC). My friend got into Harvard with a 168, although he was also Harvard undergrad, great GPA, double minority and a very interesting guy overall.Confused7 wrote:170/4.04 GPA. Any chance for Columbia, NYU, or Stanford?
- lilliea
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:46 am
Re: Official Oct. 2010 Reverse LSAT Splitters
LSAC GPA: 3.94
Oct LSAT: 161
I have no idea what I'm going to do other than retake, as I was PTing in the 170s on a consistent basis.
Oct LSAT: 161
I have no idea what I'm going to do other than retake, as I was PTing in the 170s on a consistent basis.
-
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 2:01 pm
Re: Official Oct. 2010 Reverse LSAT Splitters
Thanks for your kind words, mehs. I hope I'm not chasing an elusive dream. That is my LSAC GPA, I have decent softs and LORs, but nothing I would call "spectacular." Am also not a double minority, not even a single minority.mehs wrote:I'd say you definitely have a shot, depending on your softs and LORs (and if your 4.04 GPA is LSAC). My friend got into Harvard with a 168, although he was also Harvard undergrad, great GPA, double minority and a very interesting guy overall.Confused7 wrote:170/4.04 GPA. Any chance for Columbia, NYU, or Stanford?

-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:39 am
Re: Official Oct. 2010 Reverse LSAT Splitters
GPA 3.98
LSAT: cancel, 163, 165
any chance at top 14?
LSAT: cancel, 163, 165
any chance at top 14?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- DrackedaryMaster
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 5:11 pm
Re: Official Oct. 2010 Reverse LSAT Splitters
GPA: 3.8
LSAT: 163
Good for all the FL schools I want. Wondering if I could possibly sneak in Emory or BC. Was taking to one of my co-workers and they suggested maybe staying working full time in the Reserves/Guard and doing LS part time and try for Fordham/GT/GW, but my Post 9/11 benefits only run for about another 33 months so I'd still have to find employment.
Also, anybody got any good ideas for writing an addendum for 2 sub-150 LSAT scores? They were both over two years ago, but now that I finally have a decent score and have to write one, I'm wondering just how much of a WTF the adcomms are going to wonder with them.
LSAT: 163
Good for all the FL schools I want. Wondering if I could possibly sneak in Emory or BC. Was taking to one of my co-workers and they suggested maybe staying working full time in the Reserves/Guard and doing LS part time and try for Fordham/GT/GW, but my Post 9/11 benefits only run for about another 33 months so I'd still have to find employment.
Also, anybody got any good ideas for writing an addendum for 2 sub-150 LSAT scores? They were both over two years ago, but now that I finally have a decent score and have to write one, I'm wondering just how much of a WTF the adcomms are going to wonder with them.
- niederbomb
- Posts: 962
- Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 12:07 pm
Re: Official Oct. 2010 Reverse LSAT Splitters
Any other reverse splitters heading north? Apparently, they weigh GPA and LSAT equally in Canada.
I'm applying to UBC, the University of Toronto and maybe McGill if I can fit in a few months of French review prior to school.
Think about it? You get 164/3.9, you can go to UBC, graduate with decent grades, and get a decent $60k-110k job in a Vancouver law firm. And you graduate with <$80,000 in debt.
Go to a U.S. law school that takes 164 LSAT's, and you're likely to be cleaning toilets for the rest of your life.
I'm applying to UBC, the University of Toronto and maybe McGill if I can fit in a few months of French review prior to school.
Think about it? You get 164/3.9, you can go to UBC, graduate with decent grades, and get a decent $60k-110k job in a Vancouver law firm. And you graduate with <$80,000 in debt.
Go to a U.S. law school that takes 164 LSAT's, and you're likely to be cleaning toilets for the rest of your life.
- lilliea
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:46 am
Re: Official Oct. 2010 Reverse LSAT Splitters
niederbomb wrote:Any other reverse splitters heading north? Apparently, they weigh GPA and LSAT equally in Canada.
I'm applying to UBC, the University of Toronto and maybe McGill if I can fit in a few months of French review prior to school.
Think about it? You get 164/3.9, you can go to UBC, graduate with decent grades, and get a decent $60k-110k job in a Vancouver law firm. And you graduate with <$80,000 in debt.
Go to a U.S. law school that takes 164 LSAT's, and you're likely to be cleaning toilets for the rest of your life.
Its funny you should mention that. I'd just come to realization myself that this might be a better choice for me in regards to connections to Asia. BC in particular would be great for that
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:00 am
Re: Official Oct. 2010 Reverse LSAT Splitters
...
Last edited by eve2490 on Sat Oct 22, 2011 7:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- AverageTutoring
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:18 pm
Re: Official Oct. 2010 Reverse LSAT Splitters
GPA tends to be favoured slightly more across the board. The lowest GPA distribution you'll find is about 40% LSAT, 60% GPA. The rest have some sort of admissions index or use 30% LSAT, 70% GPA.niederbomb wrote:Any other reverse splitters heading north? Apparently, they weigh GPA and LSAT equally in Canada.
I'm applying to UBC, the University of Toronto and maybe McGill if I can fit in a few months of French review prior to school.
Think about it? You get 164/3.9, you can go to UBC, graduate with decent grades, and get a decent $60k-110k job in a Vancouver law firm. And you graduate with <$80,000 in debt.
Go to a U.S. law school that takes 164 LSAT's, and you're likely to be cleaning toilets for the rest of your life.
But yeah, you can get an amazing education in Canada without the fear of 200,000 k in dept. I like that prospect very, very much.
- purduepete2011
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 10:48 pm
Re: Official Oct. 2010 Reverse LSAT Splitters
GPA: lsac cumulative 4.02
LSAT: 166
i'm stubborn. this past thursday, i submitted applications to harvard, stanford, columbia, nyu, chicago (binding early decision), and notre dame. according to lawschoolpredictor.com, my chances at stanford, nyu, chicago are decent; harvard and columbia are long-shots; notre dame is inevitable.
if i get in to one of the top 10, i'll go; if not, i'll do something else for a few years then endure this stressful process once again. after working so hard in undergrad i will not settle for a mediocre school. i think most of you feel the same way.
LSAT: 166
i'm stubborn. this past thursday, i submitted applications to harvard, stanford, columbia, nyu, chicago (binding early decision), and notre dame. according to lawschoolpredictor.com, my chances at stanford, nyu, chicago are decent; harvard and columbia are long-shots; notre dame is inevitable.
if i get in to one of the top 10, i'll go; if not, i'll do something else for a few years then endure this stressful process once again. after working so hard in undergrad i will not settle for a mediocre school. i think most of you feel the same way.
- YankeesFan
- Posts: 533
- Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 8:42 pm
Re: Official Oct. 2010 Reverse LSAT Splitters
GPA: 3.8
LSAT: 161
Hoping for a school in the DC area, maybe GW part time or American or Mason It will be interesting to see how my cycle turns out.
LSAT: 161
Hoping for a school in the DC area, maybe GW part time or American or Mason It will be interesting to see how my cycle turns out.
- purduepete2011
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 10:48 pm
Re: Official Oct. 2010 Reverse LSAT Splitters
i think this makes you a good candidate, not a reverse-splitter.Confused7 wrote:170/4.04 GPA. Any chance for Columbia, NYU, or Stanford?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login