What's the curve? Forum

[gbpackerbacker]

If you got your score and it did not say it, give your best guess please.

[gmenfan]

I honestly don't remember many specifics from the exam other than my setup (RC/LR/LG/LG/LR), but I thought the RC section was above-average difficulty wise. The LG had a strange setup (order in relation to game difficulty/quirky first one). I kept my normal pacing for both LR sections which I was averaging around 2/3 wrong per before the exam.

Overall, I thought it was as challenging as the last PTs I took (56-59), so I'd guess -10 for a 170.

[MissLucky]

wtf i really want to know this curve. i feel like it was beastly. prob a -10

[Patriot1208]

Nobody seems to know. But i'll guess -10 with how good I felt after taking it and then not doing as well as I thought.

[Blumpbeef]

probably -10, maybe -9.

[GettingReady2010]

Has no one gotten a 170 yet?

[Patriot1208]

Has no one gotten a 170 yet?

several people have but no one has gotten the pdf's.

[bruin10]

I've seen scores of 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 179. Anyone see 178, 177 or 176?

[mjd]

-9 or -8.

[silly101]

are the pdfs usually released later?
i was under the impression that scores and pdfs would be released at the same time

[Claudius]

are the pdfs usually released later?
i was under the impression that scores and pdfs would be released at the same time

In June they were released at the same time but not all of the PDF links worked. Specifically, the PDF that showed the conversion table took an hour or two to go live.

[bruin10]

I'm guessing at least -10. I've seen scores of 170-180 (all except 176).