Wasn't the LR sections a little easy? Forum

[PinkFloydPerson]

Whats up with that? I am convinced that the LR sections were just...easy. Easier than any of the practice tests... and I did over 30. The LG / RC, though..

[HeavenWood]

It's all relative. I found LR to be average overall (one harder section and one easier section), RC seemed very easy, and games seemed harder.

[Nonok]

LR1 easy. LR2 Average. RC easy (except for transnationalism question). Games Average.

[kkklick]

Games were easy, yet I still managed to misinterpret a rule luckily it only will cost me max 3 point damage. RC first 3 passages were easy. Last one, if I understood it, wouldn't have been too bad but I got the main point question right according to a friend so I just hope I didnt bomb the african passage.

the LR I got 4th was EASY, probably made a couple mistakes as I usually do on LR but Ive never been so confident after an LR section before. LR1, I got it first, I don't know if I needed time to warm up, but I needed all 35 minutes to get through. Not to mention the tricky questions within it. So overall easier LR, but still somewhat difficult if you get caught in traps easy

[yannab]

I thought the games were sort of easy. The LR was average. But for some reason, I had trouble with RC (the questions in the last passage were hard). RC is the only section I do not feel good about coming out of that test. But, I'm hoping the easiness of the other 3 sections can offset and major damage.

[amkid100]

what did people think the difficult questions were on the transnationalism passage?

[yannab]

[quote="amkid100"]what did people think the difficult questions were on the transnationalism passage?[/quote
it has more to do with the answer choices than the question. The answers choices seemed similar to each, some being one word off/on for being considered the right answer. I am kinda bummed because I usually do pretty well on RC, and I may have gotten a few more wrong then I was hoping for. it may have been anxiety or stress. but if that was the case, I wouldn't feel well about the other sections (especially games which I got last).

[Flips88]

.

[sidhesadie]

I thought RC was average, passages maybe a bit denser than some of the PT but certainly doable.

I thought LR was so much easier than any of the PT's.

I thought games were as hard as some of the harder PT's. I stink at games, they are always my bad section, unless I happen to get several of the one type I'm good at (well, two types but there are never any circle ordering games anymore!) which, I didn't. So I thought LG were hard, but no harder than the hard PT's. Just hard for ME because that's not my strength. I guessed on at least 7 of them in that section. Ugh.

[3|ink]

LR was hard. You guys are nuts.

[Patriot1208]

LR1 easy. LR2 Average. RC easy (except for transnationalism question). Games Average.

[dcman06]

It's all relative... I moved methodically in LR, so I dunno if that meant that it was "easy" or if it was me answering the trap answer every time..

I don't think any LSAT section, except some of the games sections in the PT's from the high 40's were easy.

[kkklick]

LR was hard. You guys are nuts.

I had always struggled with LR, but I peaked right before the test. But this is teh section that I'm the worst at guaging how I did. I don't think any of us will know until the 29th. Its just so hard to stay off the forums

[PinkFloydPerson]

It's all relative... I moved methodically in LR, so I dunno if that meant that it was "easy" or if it was me answering the trap answer every time..

truth

I somehow timed the RC section wrong.. rushed through the first 3... when I hit 0 she calls "5 mins," and I had already rushed through the last passage. Killin me smalls. I guess I set my timer for 11:30 and not 11:25

[incompetentia]

LR's always been difficult to peg for me. I knew I'd blitz LG and probably fail at RC, but LR is the key to my score.

I went methodically as well, and am taking that as a good sign.