LR WAS INSANE Forum
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 1:12 pm
LR WAS INSANE
I took a bunch of PTs and it seemed all of them had 1, at most 2, absolute LR stumpers. I consistently was getting 42/50 right on LR. Oct. 2010 however, was insane for me. The car question (I couldn't find ONE single answer that made sense), the brick question, the heat in the factory question, and like 2 or 3 more I can't remember because I honestly might have blacked out. The RC and LG were pretty straightforward though.
Anyone else feel the same way?
Anyone else feel the same way?
- Adjudicator
- Posts: 1108
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 4:18 am
Re: LR WAS INSANE
rsd16 wrote:I took a bunch of PTs and it seemed all of them had 1, at most 2, absolute LR stumpers. I consistently was getting 42/50 right on LR. Oct. 2010 however, was insane for me. The car question (I couldn't find ONE single answer that made sense), the brick question, the heat in the factory question, and like 2 or 3 more I can't remember because I honestly might have blacked out. The RC and LG were pretty straightforward though.
Anyone else feel the same way?

As for the heat in the factory, and the brick question, I am maybe 60-75% sure that I got each of those. Which is obviously not a lot of certainty.
There were others, too... the very last question on my last section, a parallel flaw question about education and the economy, or something, and none of the answers made any sense to me whatsoever.
- balzern
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 2:27 pm
Re: LR WAS INSANE
Yeah I thought the LR was difficult too. I usually get about what you get on PTs 40-45 of 50. This one I am nervous about for some reason. I just felt that there weren't that many "obvious" questions where immediately you anticipate and then see the right answer...
- rso11
- Posts: 125
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:25 pm
Re: LR WAS INSANE
I agree. And I had LR as my first section - I def think nerves were part of it. Ugh.
- balzern
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 2:27 pm
Re: LR WAS INSANE
Yeah I had LR 1st and 4th and timing was an issue with me. I didn't get to the last 2 questions of both sections...
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 11:21 am
Re: LR WAS INSANE
I'm surprised more people aren't talking about the strangers question that was part of the 2nd LR section (w/ 26 questions). It came toward the end, maybe #24 or 23? It was a flaw question; perhaps many people ran out of time and didn't get a chance to answer it. I spent a minute on it and then skipped ahead and finished the final questions in the section. I spent the last five minutes going over it and finally used process of elimination to arrive at my answer. It had to do with being comfortable with approaching a stranger approximately the same age as you. Odd question.
Also, is it just me, or did the rule of law stimulus contain an extra bit of info that wasn't required to answer the question? Just in there to throw us off?
Also, is it just me, or did the rule of law stimulus contain an extra bit of info that wasn't required to answer the question? Just in there to throw us off?
- balzern
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 2:27 pm
Re: LR WAS INSANE
I don't remember what question specifically but I do remember being with wtf why is the garbage in the stimulus - perhaps it was that question.
- JoeShmoe11
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:16 pm
Re: LR WAS INSANE
Yes it did. I re-read it like three times and nearly yelled out "you tricky buttholes!". But once you realized it the question was pretty easy.marsilni wrote:Also, is it just me, or did the rule of law stimulus contain an extra bit of info that wasn't required to answer the question? Just in there to throw us off?
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 2:54 pm
Re: LR WAS INSANE
WHattt? I thought LR was the easiest part of the test
RC was a little bit of a bitch
RC was a little bit of a bitch
- The Gentleman
- Posts: 670
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 12:25 am
Re: LR WAS INSANE
lol that would have been pricelessJoeShmoe11 wrote:Yes it did. I re-read it like three times and nearly yelled out "you tricky buttholes!".
- cinefile 17
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:32 pm
Re: LR WAS INSANE
Can someone PM me more about what this question was.JoeShmoe11 wrote:Yes it did. I re-read it like three times and nearly yelled out "you tricky buttholes!". But once you realized it the question was pretty easy.marsilni wrote:Also, is it just me, or did the rule of law stimulus contain an extra bit of info that wasn't required to answer the question? Just in there to throw us off?
-
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:31 pm
Re: LR WAS INSANE
JoeShmoe11 wrote:Yes it did. I re-read it like three times and nearly yelled out "you tricky buttholes!". But once you realized it the question was pretty easy.marsilni wrote:Also, is it just me, or did the rule of law stimulus contain an extra bit of info that wasn't required to answer the question? Just in there to throw us off?
ya i got that too - that it gave us an extra sentence
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 8:44 pm
Re: LR WAS INSANE
I'm not sure I remember a question about brick houses or heat in a factory. Can anyone elaborate on those? If you don't want to discuss LSAT questions, you might just say something about a question someone had in discussion recently. PM would also be fine. Thanks.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- cinefile 17
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:32 pm
Re: LR WAS INSANE
Was the rule of law a parallel reasoning question? If so, I think I know which one it was. I suck at them in general.
- Perch
- Posts: 517
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:36 pm
Re: LR WAS INSANE
+1. stranger danger!marsilni wrote:I'm surprised more people aren't talking about the strangers question that was part of the 2nd LR section (w/ 26 questions). It came toward the end, maybe #24 or 23? It was a flaw question; perhaps many people ran out of time and didn't get a chance to answer it. I spent a minute on it and then skipped ahead and finished the final questions in the section. I spent the last five minutes going over it and finally used process of elimination to arrive at my answer. It had to do with being comfortable with approaching a stranger approximately the same age as you. Odd question.
Also, is it just me, or did the rule of law stimulus contain an extra bit of info that wasn't required to answer the question? Just in there to throw us off?
- jetergrl2ss
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 11:11 pm
Re: LR WAS INSANE
The heat in a factory one had to do with some weird generators and converting waste. The brick houses was about houses on a street, brick, 2 stories... Ringing any bells?IBThatGuy wrote:I'm not sure I remember a question about brick houses or heat in a factory. Can anyone elaborate on those? If you don't want to discuss LSAT questions, you might just say something about a question someone had in discussion recently. PM would also be fine. Thanks.
- DrackedaryMaster
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 5:11 pm
Re: LR WAS INSANE
IBThatGuy wrote:I'm not sure I remember a question about brick houses or heat in a factory. Can anyone elaborate on those? If you don't want to discuss LSAT questions, you might just say something about a question someone had in discussion recently. PM would also be fine. Thanks.
All this talk of Brick Houses?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrBx6mAWYPU
Now I can't get this out of my head. Thanks alot.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 835
- Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 1:56 am
Re: LR WAS INSANE
I feel taken advantage of by that question.JoeShmoe11 wrote:Yes it did. I re-read it like three times and nearly yelled out "you tricky buttholes!". But once you realized it the question was pretty easy.marsilni wrote:Also, is it just me, or did the rule of law stimulus contain an extra bit of info that wasn't required to answer the question? Just in there to throw us off?
-
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 4:39 pm
Re: LR WAS INSANE
Was it just me, or were there a lot more flaw and principle questions that usual? I saw way less assumption questions than I expected.
-
- Posts: 919
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 2:32 pm
Re: LR WAS INSANE
Oh thank God. Now I feel better about my answer. I just stared at it for like 2-3 minutes and was trying to connect all of the information, and then realized that some information was simply irrelevant.grover23 wrote:JoeShmoe11 wrote:Yes it did. I re-read it like three times and nearly yelled out "you tricky buttholes!". But once you realized it the question was pretty easy.marsilni wrote:Also, is it just me, or did the rule of law stimulus contain an extra bit of info that wasn't required to answer the question? Just in there to throw us off?
ya i got that too - that it gave us an extra sentence
::wipes brow::
The strangers question was both stupid and confusing. I hated it
- ThreeYears
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 5:26 pm
Re: LR WAS INSANE
Could you kindly elaborate the rule of law question a little bit more, please?cowgirl_bebop wrote:Oh thank God. Now I feel better about my answer. I just stared at it for like 2-3 minutes and was trying to connect all of the information, and then realized that some information was simply irrelevant.grover23 wrote:JoeShmoe11 wrote:Yes it did. I re-read it like three times and nearly yelled out "you tricky buttholes!". But once you realized it the question was pretty easy.marsilni wrote:Also, is it just me, or did the rule of law stimulus contain an extra bit of info that wasn't required to answer the question? Just in there to throw us off?
ya i got that too - that it gave us an extra sentence
::wipes brow::
The strangers question was both stupid and confusing. I hated it
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- skers
- Posts: 5230
- Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:33 am
Re: LR WAS INSANE
I'm secretly (and selfishly) hoping that significant difficulties with LR are widely representative as that may push the curve up. I thought this was the easiest two sections of LR I've taken. Or maybe Odwalla Superfood has logical boosting powers. There were questions that were a little tricky, but the right answer really seemed to jump off the page on every question.
Steel-heat had some tricky wrong answers, but there was definitely a clear right one. Same with rule of law and hiring. IMO, toughest was Brick house, but there seemed to be only one answer that was parallel qualitatively, at least that I saw.
Steel-heat had some tricky wrong answers, but there was definitely a clear right one. Same with rule of law and hiring. IMO, toughest was Brick house, but there seemed to be only one answer that was parallel qualitatively, at least that I saw.
-
- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:41 pm
Re: LR WAS INSANE
LR had a lot of questions that I think were formatted very differently, had never seen anything like them. I really think that its going ot end up being an overall hard lr.
I felt that I did well though
I felt that I did well though
-
- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:41 pm
Re: LR WAS INSANE
I had essentially the same experience as you Temporary Saint. and am hoping for the same effect on the curve
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login