RC LR (25) LR (25) LG LR (26) - Experimental?! Forum

[lsatnyc83]

I had RC (27) LR (25) LR (25) LG (23) LR (26). Anyone have an idea which was experimental?

NOTE: I did not have RC (27) LR (26) LR (25) LG (23) LR (26) or RC (27) LR (25) LR (26) LG (23) LR (26)

[LogicGamez]

Yep I had the exact same setup. Section 2(the first LR) was experimental.

[lsatnyc83]

Yep I had the exact same setup. Section 2(the first LR) was experimental.

Is it possible that there were two versions of the exam that had the same section layout?
RC (27) LR (25,Experimental) LR (25) LG (23) LR (26)
and RC (27) LR (25) LR (25, Experimental) LG (23) LR (26)

Does anyone know for sure?

[ND'10]

Yep I had the exact same setup. Section 2(the first LR) was experimental.

This one seemed like the easier one to me. Figures.

[originalmutt]

I also had RC LR LR LG LR ... The first LR had 25 questions and was extremely easy. I don't recall how many questions the other two LRs had. My brain is pretty fried right now.

[bball85]

I had the same sequence, I'm pretty sure the third section was experimental, it was way too hard to be the real section. (or at least i hope). Usually there's one difficult LR and one relatively easier section. I thought the final LR section in this sequence (26 questions) was rather difficult which is why I think the third LR here had to be experimental since it was even more difficult.

Thoughts?

[lsatnyc83]

I had the same sequence, I'm pretty sure the third section was experimental, it was way too hard to be the real section. (or at least i hope). Usually there's one difficult LR and one relatively easier section. I thought the final LR section in this sequence (26 questions) was rather difficult which is why I think the third LR here had to be experimental since it was even more difficult.

Thoughts?

I also found Section 2 to be surprisingly easy, but think I misaligned my answers on the scantron so am hoping it is experimental!

[minnbills]

I had the same setup. I'm pretty sure the 3rd section (2nd LR) was the experimental. It was way too difficult and every question seemed really long. Then again, the other 2 LR sections were easy so who knows.

[bartleby]

I think you guys are late to the game. The easy ass one, Section 2 (LR 1 of 3) has been confirmed to be the meaningless one. Let go of all hope.

[originalmutt]

It seemed like one of the sections had super easy main conclusion questions ... but I can't remember which one.

[tooswolle]

I don't think we can just say one section is experimental when there could be different configurations. For lr 1 (sec 2) I remember a question about filling the conclusion that logically followed. For lr2 (sec 3) I had the question of selling the business. If anyone can verify either one as the real one than I think we can resolve the rc lr (25) lr (25) rc lr (26)

[lsatnyc83]

I filled in my answer for Section 2, question 14 twice by mistake and therefore misaligned the next TEN questions. If ANYONE had RC (27) LR (25) LR (25, Experimental) LG (23) LR (26) or has heard of anyone who has, PLEASE let me know so I can cancel my score.

[lsatnyc83]

So no one so far has heard of this combination?

[trayball23]

I had that

[lsatnyc83]

I had that

You mean had RC LR25 LR25 LG LR26 or you are SURE the 3rd section was experimental? If you believe you had the 3rd section as experimental, why?

[lsatnyc83]

Does each test booklet variation have a different code or does EVER book have a different code? Does anyone who had RC LR25(Experimental) LR25 LG LR26 remember their booklet code?