Sufficient or Necessary Assumption? Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
catsparka

Bronze
Posts: 267
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 4:50 pm

Sufficient or Necessary Assumption?

Post by catsparka » Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:24 pm

Just ran across a question stem that asks, "Which one of the following is an assumption the argument requires in order for its conclusion to be properly drawn?"

Is this a necessary assumption or a sufficient assumption ("Justify the Conclusion") question?

Even though in this question, the distinction doesn't really matter (there's only one feasible answer choice either way), I just wanted to clarify in case there are situations where the distinction between the two would be the key to determining which is correct among two choices.

Thanks!

dakatz

Gold
Posts: 2422
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:19 pm

Re: Sufficient or Necessary Assumption?

Post by dakatz » Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:29 pm

"Requires" is an indicator of a necessary assumption. Words like "depends" and "requires" always indicate necessary.

User avatar
catsparka

Bronze
Posts: 267
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 4:50 pm

Re: Sufficient or Necessary Assumption?

Post by catsparka » Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:32 pm

dakatz wrote:"Requires" is an indicator of a necessary assumption. Words like "depends" and "requires" always indicate necessary.
Okay, thanks! :D

wjun15

Bronze
Posts: 102
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 8:09 pm

Re: Sufficient or Necessary Assumption?

Post by wjun15 » Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:37 pm

justify the conclusion i believe, correct?

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”