LSAT = MYSTICISM Forum
-
- Posts: 242
- Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 12:09 am
LSAT = MYSTICISM
the lsat can not put random sentences together and then expect it to represent any sort of real life situation or evaluate one's reasoning since in these cases the entire stimulus is nonsensical. i dont care what psychometric bs they use, this test is like old-fashioned bloodletting to cure a disease.
that, my friends, is MYSTICISM.
that, my friends, is MYSTICISM.
Last edited by testmachine45 on Mon Oct 04, 2010 10:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- DearCan
- Posts: 302
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 6:13 am
Re: LSAT = MYSTICISM
Example, please?testmachine45 wrote:the lsat can not put random sentences together and then expect it to represent any sort of real life situation or one's reasoning. i dont care what psychometric bs they use, this test is like old-fashioned bloodletting to cure a disease.
that, my friends, is MYSTICISM.
- pkpop
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 9:09 pm
Re: LSAT = MYSTICISM
Logic Reasoning -> Flaw -> False Analogy?testmachine45 wrote:the lsat can not put random sentences together and then expect it to represent any sort of real life situation or evaluate one's reasoning since in these cases the entire stimulus is nonsensical. i dont care what psychometric bs they use, this test is like old-fashioned bloodletting to cure a disease.
that, my friends, is MYSTICISM.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 242
- Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 12:09 am
Re: LSAT = MYSTICISM
Consistent with the hypothesis, the data showed that the LSAT was a relatively robust predictor of in-class exams and a relatively weak predictor on take-home exams and papers. In contrast, undergraduate GPA was a relatively stable predictor on all three testing methods. The major implication of this study is that the current emphasis on time-pressured law school exams may significantly increase the relative importance of the LSAT as an admission criterion. As a result, significantly fewer minority students can be admitted through the regular admissions process. Moreover, the findings of this study suggest that when speed is used as a variable on law school exams, the type of testing method, independent of knowledge and preparation, can change the ordering (i.e., relative grades) of individual test-takers. Finally, this study found some preliminary evidence that the performance gap between white and minority students may be significantly smaller on less time-pressured testing methods, including blindgraded take-home exams. Definitive evidence on this issue will require a larger sample size.
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:28 pm
Re: LSAT = MYSTICISM
I got this one wrong but I felt stupid during review for the mistake (which could be said with 99% of my mistakes in LR)testmachine45 wrote:pt 60 lr2 #10
- DearCan
- Posts: 302
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 6:13 am
Re: LSAT = MYSTICISM
You've encountered one question out of thousands that you don't understand, and now the LSAT is an ineffective predictor of one's ability to reason? What does that say about your ability to reason?
- niederbomb
- Posts: 962
- Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 12:07 pm
Re: LSAT = MYSTICISM
I hate take-home exams and always do worse on them than timed exams.
I hope that means I'm supposed to ace the LSAT in five days.
I hope that means I'm supposed to ace the LSAT in five days.

-
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 10:30 am
Re: LSAT = MYSTICISM
Flaw in the reasoning: Stimulus never stated that "niederbomb" does well/nor aces timed exams. Instead all we can gather is that for "niederbomb" timed exam scores > take home exam scores.niederbomb wrote:I hate take-home exams and always do worse on them than timed exams.
I hope that means I'm supposed to ace the LSAT in five days.
Sorry, I'm currently an LSAT machine.
-
- Posts: 468
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 2:57 pm
Re: LSAT = MYSTICISM
Good god LS applicants are tools
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: LSAT = MYSTICISM
IT doesn't end on matriculation.lawschoollll wrote:Good god LS applicants are tools
-
- Posts: 468
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 2:57 pm
Re: LSAT = MYSTICISM
but CERTAINLY associates at law firms are exclusively edgy and cool???Desert Fox wrote:IT doesn't end on matriculation.lawschoollll wrote:Good god LS applicants are tools
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 11453
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: LSAT = MYSTICISM
OP: Weren't you sworn to secrecy about this ?
-
- Posts: 3311
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: LSAT = MYSTICISM
No, according to many around here they're either showering in gold or begging on the streets.lawschoollll wrote:but CERTAINLY associates at law firms are exclusively edgy and cool???Desert Fox wrote:IT doesn't end on matriculation.lawschoollll wrote:Good god LS applicants are tools
- incompetentia
- Posts: 2277
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm
Re: LSAT = MYSTICISM
22. Which of the following is an assumption on which this argument depends?minnbills wrote:No, according to many around here they're either showering in gold or begging on the streets.lawschoollll wrote:but CERTAINLY associates at law firms are exclusively edgy and cool???Desert Fox wrote:IT doesn't end on matriculation.lawschoollll wrote:Good god LS applicants are tools
(A) Law school applicants are easily identifiable by the general public.
(B) Showering in gold is considered more edgy than begging on the streets.
(C) If showering in gold is edgy, then it is not cool, and vice versa.
(D) Associates at law firms are begging on the streets if they are not showering in gold.
(E) Wait, law firm associates aren't cool?
-
- Posts: 1879
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:52 pm
Re: LSAT = MYSTICISM
Get your rage on, bro. They're discriminating against your lower intelligence!
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- beachbum
- Posts: 2758
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm
Re: LSAT = MYSTICISM
weren't you the same guy who was gonna off himself because he was having a bad day with the LSAT? You might consider taking a break from this test.
-
- Posts: 242
- Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 12:09 am
Re: LSAT = MYSTICISM
today i became got sick, coughing and flu. u guys think take in dec? ive only taken 4 testpreps, got 148, 160, 171, and today 160(while sick). also took testmasters.
will my peers think im a wuss?
will my peers think im a wuss?
- St.Remy
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 10:12 pm
Re: LSAT = MYSTICISM
If by peers you mean people on this site, then yes. You are quite obviously a flame.testmachine45 wrote:today i became got sick, coughing and flu. u guys think take in dec? ive only taken 4 testpreps, got 148, 160, 171, and today 160(while sick). also took testmasters.
will my peers think im a wuss?
-
- Posts: 242
- Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 12:09 am
Re: LSAT = MYSTICISM
ha, you are wrong and a false accuser.
u r the flame in this sit.
u r the flame in this sit.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- beachbum
- Posts: 2758
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:35 pm
Re: LSAT = MYSTICISM
+1. I don't understand what drives these nerds to post stupid shit on an otherwise helpful message board. Go back to WoW and self-loathing.St.Remy wrote:If by peers you mean people on this site, then yes. You are quite obviously a flame.testmachine45 wrote:today i became got sick, coughing and flu. u guys think take in dec? ive only taken 4 testpreps, got 148, 160, 171, and today 160(while sick). also took testmasters.
will my peers think im a wuss?
-
- Posts: 242
- Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 12:09 am
Re: LSAT = MYSTICISM
You are not being helpful, nor friendly, by attacking people, Beachbum. Beachbum has a contradiction in his argument.beachbum wrote:+1. I don't understand what drives these nerds to post stupid shit on an otherwise helpful message board. Go back to WoW and self-loathing.St.Remy wrote:If by peers you mean people on this site, then yes. You are quite obviously a flame.testmachine45 wrote:today i became got sick, coughing and flu. u guys think take in dec? ive only taken 4 testpreps, got 148, 160, 171, and today 160(while sick). also took testmasters.
will my peers think im a wuss?
Funny your econ major couldn't get you a better job than this shit you DAOL
EDIT: The nerd is you, with the econ major(that's fucking different), spiked hair(like your other frat members), and the hawaian shirt you where to keggers where u watch as your fellow frat boys probably wearing the same thing steal your woman. jersey shore POS.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login