Not sure how many people had used this, this is what I've been practicing on and it's free and available on lsac.org: http://www.lsac.org/JD/pdfs/SamplePTJune.pdf
I'm opening a new post on this for discussing if anyone has any questions with this because I do have a few problems with it myself....
Section 1, #2:
Which one of the following must be true about any acceptable product code?
I got 6 possible combinations:
2, 4, 0, 3, 1
2, 4, 1, 0, 3
2, 4, 0, 1, 3
1, 2, 0, 4, 3
1, 2, 0, 3, 4
1, 2, 3, 0, 4
as far as i know, i think all of the above are well fit for the conditions listed but obviously something's wrong with them cuz' i'm not getting the right answer so I need some help with this...the correct answer is C. The keys are available all the way down at the bottom of the pdf
June 2007 LSAT Forum
-
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:26 pm
Re: June 2007 LSAT
Your solutions are perfect. They illustrate that 2 must always precede 3. Hence, choice C is correct.
-
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:45 pm
Re: June 2007 LSAT
oops...i overlooked the 3rd statement...that's a serious problem with me that i always overlook something and that's the area i really need to improve on...
Another problem here...
Section 1, #6
I'm stuck in between choice A and C, help please...
The illustration I have is:
R: (_), H, n/a
F: (_), G or L, n/a
S: (_), G or H, n/a
p.s., is it ok to post questions like this here if you have a problem with the PT or should i hire a professional tutor? i dont mean to be a nuisance but thought this is how the forum is supposed to work and im on a tight budget, as you can tell, im studying for the test on my own
Another problem here...
Section 1, #6
I'm stuck in between choice A and C, help please...
The illustration I have is:
R: (_), H, n/a
F: (_), G or L, n/a
S: (_), G or H, n/a
p.s., is it ok to post questions like this here if you have a problem with the PT or should i hire a professional tutor? i dont mean to be a nuisance but thought this is how the forum is supposed to work and im on a tight budget, as you can tell, im studying for the test on my own
-
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:26 pm
Re: June 2007 LSAT
Have a look at these solutions and see if that clarifies #6:
June 2007 Logic Games Solutions (LinkRemoved)
June 2007 Logic Games Solutions (LinkRemoved)
-
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:45 pm
Re: June 2007 LSAT
awesome, thanks for the solutionsCambridge LSAT wrote:Have a look at these solutions and see if that clarifies #6:
June 2007 Logic Games Solutions (LinkRemoved)
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login