deleted Forum

dowon · Post by **dowon** » Mon Sep 06, 2010 9:40 pm

delete

cowgirl_bebop · Post by **cowgirl_bebop** » Mon Sep 06, 2010 9:48 pm

How far were you from 170 and how long have you been studying?

At this point, rushing to "cram" for the LSAT may only get you a lower score that is going to adversely affect your cycle. If you have been preparing all summer, you may just have hit a plateau. I hit one back at 166 that it took me a long time to get out of. High 160s (like 167-169) is a good score that has you in the 95th percentile. I personally would not risk a lower score or even the same score. If you dont think you can make a significant jump, I would just go with what I have.

With a good GPA and some decent softs you should be good to go.

bk1 · Post by **bk1** » Mon Sep 06, 2010 9:57 pm

Since almost all schools take your best score there is little to no risk associated with retaking. That being said if you aren't PT'ing above your current score I say it wouldn't be worth it to retake.

Grizz · Post by **Grizz** » Mon Sep 06, 2010 10:05 pm

bk187 wrote:Since almost all schools take your best score there is little to no risk associated with retaking. That being said if you aren't PT'ing above your current score I say it wouldn't be worth it to retake.

Agreed.

deleted Forum

deleted

Re: Is the LSAT worth re-taking?

Re: Is the LSAT worth re-taking?

Re: Is the LSAT worth re-taking?

Register now to search topics and post comments!