Splicing in Experimental Sections Forum
- GoldenGloves
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 1:02 pm
Splicing in Experimental Sections
Just wondering what you guys do to add in experimental sections for filling out exams. LSAT Blog recommends using sections from a single PT as experimentals for the next 3 PTs one takes. Any thoughts on this?
- jtemp320
- Posts: 481
- Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 6:27 pm
Re: Splicing in Experimental Sections
If you are using 4 section preptests (ie just from cambridge or "actual lsats" book) I'd add an experimental to make it feel real...most prep companies do that for their ptsGoldenGloves wrote:Just wondering what you guys do to add in experimental sections for filling out exams. LSAT Blog recommends using sections from a single PT as experimentals for the next 3 PTs one takes. Any thoughts on this?
-
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 3:29 pm
Re: Splicing in Experimental Sections
I've been taking sections from 39, 40, 41 and 42 to use as my experimental section just because I didn't want to burn a more recent PrepTest. I wish I would've known earlier about the Cambridge PrepTests that already come with experimental sections.
- GoldenGloves
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 1:02 pm
Re: Splicing in Experimental Sections
I realize this. I'm curious, however, of the methods everyone uses to account for the additional section. How do you just randomly choose sections? & which PTs do you use?jtemp320 wrote:If you are using 4 section preptests (ie just from cambridge or "actual lsats" book) I'd add an experimental to make it feel real...most prep companies do that for their ptsGoldenGloves wrote:Just wondering what you guys do to add in experimental sections for filling out exams. LSAT Blog recommends using sections from a single PT as experimentals for the next 3 PTs one takes. Any thoughts on this?
Hijodehombre, that's a good idea.
- 3|ink
- Posts: 7393
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:23 pm
Re: Splicing in Experimental Sections
Here's the logic behind using experimentals:GoldenGloves wrote:I realize this. I'm curious, however, of the methods everyone uses to account for the additional section. How do you just randomly choose sections? & which PTs do you use?jtemp320 wrote:If you are using 4 section preptests (ie just from cambridge or "actual lsats" book) I'd add an experimental to make it feel real...most prep companies do that for their ptsGoldenGloves wrote:Just wondering what you guys do to add in experimental sections for filling out exams. LSAT Blog recommends using sections from a single PT as experimentals for the next 3 PTs one takes. Any thoughts on this?
Hijodehombre, that's a good idea.
1.) Better simulates test day
2.) You'll still do as many problems as you would otherwise. It's the same amount of practice.
3.) A follow-up on reason one, learning to stay focused after the 15 minute break is crucial.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ElvisAaron
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 8:03 am
Re: Splicing in Experimental Sections
I've found it helpful to make the experimental section simply the first section of the next practice test I am taking. That way there's no way for a mental letdown there could be when you know a section "doesnt count", or if its one you've done before. It counts towards my next score so it gets my full attention, and you don't know what you're getting ahead of time.
-
- Posts: 254
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 8:02 pm
Re: Splicing in Experimental Sections
similar to my approach -- i don't use experimentals bc in reality you just need to be able to do 3 sections in a row (the break revitalizes me fully, i find) i do 3 sections, take a minute break and then go for the 4th.acrossthelake wrote:I'd use "earlier" tests to put inside just because they're less valuable and better to ruin. I personally didn't use the experimental, but eliminated the break, during practice.