LSAT - Wrong Diagnostic Forum
-
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 9:21 pm
LSAT - Wrong Diagnostic
Whats up guys...
I took my diagnostic last week and got a 160.
I've taken three diagnostics since then and pulled in a 151, a 151, and a 151.
Its safe to say, I'm a 151 scoring person right now...
The 160 that I got was PT9.
The 151's were from PT's in the 40's (i don't remember the exact number)
With that being said, I start the PowerScore full length next week. I will do every bit of the homework I'm given. period.
How much can I reasonably expect to gain throughout the course and before I take the LSAT in October?
Thanks!
I took my diagnostic last week and got a 160.
I've taken three diagnostics since then and pulled in a 151, a 151, and a 151.
Its safe to say, I'm a 151 scoring person right now...
The 160 that I got was PT9.
The 151's were from PT's in the 40's (i don't remember the exact number)
With that being said, I start the PowerScore full length next week. I will do every bit of the homework I'm given. period.
How much can I reasonably expect to gain throughout the course and before I take the LSAT in October?
Thanks!
- Tanicius
- Posts: 2984
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:54 am
Re: LSAT - Wrong Diagnostic
10 points at least I would say. I took a diagnostic and got a 155, did the PS bibles and got a 169. Both tests were relatively recent.
- Anaconda
- Posts: 605
- Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 3:51 pm
Re: LSAT - Wrong Diagnostic
Where did you see most of the decline in your score (LR/LR/RC, etc)? 160 to 151 is pretty big.
- kazu
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:35 pm
Re: LSAT - Wrong Diagnostic
Don't put too much importance on PT scores from before the 40s. PT 9 is a loooooooong time ago, the curve was much more lenient then, and the questions were a bit different as well.
- eandy
- Posts: 2724
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 7:07 pm
Re: LSAT - Wrong Diagnostic
This.kazu wrote:Don't put too much importance on PT scores from before the 40s. PT 9 is a loooooooong time ago, the curve was much more lenient then, and the questions were a bit different as well.
The really early PTs are very different from recent PTs.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 9:21 pm
Re: LSAT - Wrong Diagnostic
That is what I'm starting to figure out... I just don't want to run out of practice tests from PT40 and newer.eandy wrote:This.kazu wrote:Don't put too much importance on PT scores from before the 40s. PT 9 is a loooooooong time ago, the curve was much more lenient then, and the questions were a bit different as well.
The really early PTs are very different from recent PTs.
- kazu
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:35 pm
Re: LSAT - Wrong Diagnostic
Don't get me wrong, the early ones are very useful for practicing & honing your skills. Just don't put too much importance on the actual numerical score that you get.nickbentley wrote:That is what I'm starting to figure out... I just don't want to run out of practice tests from PT40 and newer.eandy wrote:This.kazu wrote:Don't put too much importance on PT scores from before the 40s. PT 9 is a loooooooong time ago, the curve was much more lenient then, and the questions were a bit different as well.
The really early PTs are very different from recent PTs.
- yzero1
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 4:33 pm
Re: LSAT - Wrong Diagnostic
Your improvement will probably hinge on the nature of your mistakes. Are you finding yourself struggling with a particular section? Is the timing getting to you? Knowing your weaknesses and focusing on them will take you a long way in getting the score you want.