LSAT - Wrong Diagnostic Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply
nickbentley

Bronze
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 9:21 pm

LSAT - Wrong Diagnostic

Post by nickbentley » Wed Aug 04, 2010 8:40 pm

Whats up guys...

I took my diagnostic last week and got a 160.

I've taken three diagnostics since then and pulled in a 151, a 151, and a 151.

Its safe to say, I'm a 151 scoring person right now...

The 160 that I got was PT9.

The 151's were from PT's in the 40's (i don't remember the exact number)


With that being said, I start the PowerScore full length next week. I will do every bit of the homework I'm given. period.

How much can I reasonably expect to gain throughout the course and before I take the LSAT in October?

Thanks!

User avatar
Tanicius

Gold
Posts: 2984
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:54 am

Re: LSAT - Wrong Diagnostic

Post by Tanicius » Wed Aug 04, 2010 8:51 pm

10 points at least I would say. I took a diagnostic and got a 155, did the PS bibles and got a 169. Both tests were relatively recent.

User avatar
Anaconda

Silver
Posts: 605
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 3:51 pm

Re: LSAT - Wrong Diagnostic

Post by Anaconda » Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:36 pm

Where did you see most of the decline in your score (LR/LR/RC, etc)? 160 to 151 is pretty big.

User avatar
kazu

Gold
Posts: 1600
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:35 pm

Re: LSAT - Wrong Diagnostic

Post by kazu » Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:40 pm

Don't put too much importance on PT scores from before the 40s. PT 9 is a loooooooong time ago, the curve was much more lenient then, and the questions were a bit different as well.

User avatar
eandy

Gold
Posts: 2724
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 7:07 pm

Re: LSAT - Wrong Diagnostic

Post by eandy » Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:42 pm

kazu wrote:Don't put too much importance on PT scores from before the 40s. PT 9 is a loooooooong time ago, the curve was much more lenient then, and the questions were a bit different as well.
This.

The really early PTs are very different from recent PTs.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


nickbentley

Bronze
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 9:21 pm

Re: LSAT - Wrong Diagnostic

Post by nickbentley » Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:59 pm

eandy wrote:
kazu wrote:Don't put too much importance on PT scores from before the 40s. PT 9 is a loooooooong time ago, the curve was much more lenient then, and the questions were a bit different as well.
This.

The really early PTs are very different from recent PTs.
That is what I'm starting to figure out... I just don't want to run out of practice tests from PT40 and newer.

User avatar
kazu

Gold
Posts: 1600
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:35 pm

Re: LSAT - Wrong Diagnostic

Post by kazu » Thu Aug 05, 2010 12:04 am

nickbentley wrote:
eandy wrote:
kazu wrote:Don't put too much importance on PT scores from before the 40s. PT 9 is a loooooooong time ago, the curve was much more lenient then, and the questions were a bit different as well.
This.

The really early PTs are very different from recent PTs.
That is what I'm starting to figure out... I just don't want to run out of practice tests from PT40 and newer.
Don't get me wrong, the early ones are very useful for practicing & honing your skills. Just don't put too much importance on the actual numerical score that you get.

User avatar
yzero1

Bronze
Posts: 185
Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 4:33 pm

Re: LSAT - Wrong Diagnostic

Post by yzero1 » Thu Aug 05, 2010 12:11 am

Your improvement will probably hinge on the nature of your mistakes. Are you finding yourself struggling with a particular section? Is the timing getting to you? Knowing your weaknesses and focusing on them will take you a long way in getting the score you want.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”