. Forum
- dutchstriker
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 3:15 pm
Re: Grouping (In/Out) Inferences
I prefer big chains. If you know how to use them, they're much more compact and quicker.
I think this is a useful article in its entirety, but there's a section on linking conditionals in there as well: http://www.top-law-schools.com/conditio ... oning.html.
I think this is a useful article in its entirety, but there's a section on linking conditionals in there as well: http://www.top-law-schools.com/conditio ... oning.html.
-
- Posts: 322
- Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 11:30 am
Re: Grouping (In/Out) Inferences
Yeah, I'm looking at the birds in the forest game.
Powerscore would have me write 8 or 10 inferences.
I can put together two chains that seem a lot more handy (griffon prep has a good chain).
Are there pitfalls with chains?
Powerscore would have me write 8 or 10 inferences.
I can put together two chains that seem a lot more handy (griffon prep has a good chain).
Are there pitfalls with chains?
- dutchstriker
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 3:15 pm
Re: Grouping (In/Out) Inferences
Not if you know how to use them correctly.Skyhook wrote:Yeah, I'm looking at the birds in the forest game.
Powerscore would have me write 8 or 10 inferences.
I can put together two chains that seem a lot more handy (griffon prep has a good chain).
Are there pitfalls with chains?
-
- Posts: 531
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 5:56 pm
Re: Grouping (In/Out) Inferences
One thing that I do that helps me a ton is to use a T square for local questions with in on the left and out on the right, my course instructor used this method and at first I didn't like it but now I think it is a very efficient way to play the game because your local setup takes almost no time to setup.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login