. Forum
- dutchstriker

- Posts: 276
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 3:15 pm
Re: Grouping (In/Out) Inferences
I prefer big chains. If you know how to use them, they're much more compact and quicker.
I think this is a useful article in its entirety, but there's a section on linking conditionals in there as well: http://www.top-law-schools.com/conditio ... oning.html.
I think this is a useful article in its entirety, but there's a section on linking conditionals in there as well: http://www.top-law-schools.com/conditio ... oning.html.
-
Skyhook

- Posts: 322
- Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 11:30 am
Re: Grouping (In/Out) Inferences
Yeah, I'm looking at the birds in the forest game.
Powerscore would have me write 8 or 10 inferences.
I can put together two chains that seem a lot more handy (griffon prep has a good chain).
Are there pitfalls with chains?
Powerscore would have me write 8 or 10 inferences.
I can put together two chains that seem a lot more handy (griffon prep has a good chain).
Are there pitfalls with chains?
- dutchstriker

- Posts: 276
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 3:15 pm
Re: Grouping (In/Out) Inferences
Not if you know how to use them correctly.Skyhook wrote:Yeah, I'm looking at the birds in the forest game.
Powerscore would have me write 8 or 10 inferences.
I can put together two chains that seem a lot more handy (griffon prep has a good chain).
Are there pitfalls with chains?
-
thegrayman

- Posts: 531
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 5:56 pm
Re: Grouping (In/Out) Inferences
One thing that I do that helps me a ton is to use a T square for local questions with in on the left and out on the right, my course instructor used this method and at first I didn't like it but now I think it is a very efficient way to play the game because your local setup takes almost no time to setup.