Improving on the LSAT Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply
glcoupe

New
Posts: 41
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:59 pm

Improving on the LSAT

Post by glcoupe » Sat Jul 24, 2010 1:10 pm

What does everyone think is a reasonable amount to improve on your real LSAT from your diagnostic? i.e. if I got a 155 on my diag what should I shoot for on my actual test?

User avatar
Sell Manilla

Bronze
Posts: 206
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 10:08 pm

Re: Improving on the LSAT

Post by Sell Manilla » Sat Jul 24, 2010 1:18 pm

I have no idea what the average or common consensus is, but I think "diagnostics" are a terrible idea, & are actually a misnomer.
Read the Powerscore bibles for games & reasoning, take un-timed tests and slowly work up your speed while answering every question. Eventually make the transition to a timed test. Count your second timed test as a "diagnostic". I don't see the utility in rushing into a number before it's even vaguely representative of where you stand.

You still have dozens of practice tests left to improve your timing & weak points.

Edit: a mod might consider moving this to LSAT prep?

User avatar
Patriot1208

Platinum
Posts: 7023
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am

Re: Improving on the LSAT

Post by Patriot1208 » Sat Jul 24, 2010 7:20 pm

wrong thread

User avatar
SullaFelix

Bronze
Posts: 113
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:18 pm

Re: Improving on the LSAT

Post by SullaFelix » Sat Jul 24, 2010 8:38 pm

glcoupe wrote:What does everyone think is a reasonable amount to improve on your real LSAT from your diagnostic? i.e. if I got a 155 on my diag what should I shoot for on my actual test?
180.

There's no real sense in setting a target number on a test that doesn't penalize wrong answers. Just keep at it — there's a lot of time to go.

User avatar
Sell Manilla

Bronze
Posts: 206
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 10:08 pm

Re: Improving on the LSAT

Post by Sell Manilla » Sat Jul 24, 2010 8:40 pm

SullaFelix wrote:There's no real sense in setting a target number on a test that doesn't penalize wrong answers.
...unless you get more than two-ish answers wrong...

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
bleu

New
Posts: 76
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 5:01 pm

Re: Improving on the LSAT

Post by bleu » Sat Jul 24, 2010 8:42 pm

Patriot1208 wrote:wrong thread
--ImageRemoved--


lol

User avatar
SullaFelix

Bronze
Posts: 113
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:18 pm

Re: Improving on the LSAT

Post by SullaFelix » Sat Jul 24, 2010 8:46 pm

Sell Manilla wrote:
SullaFelix wrote:There's no real sense in setting a target number on a test that doesn't penalize wrong answers.
...unless you get more than two-ish answers wrong...
Some standardized tests — for example, the SATs, which I'm sure most of us took — penalize you for a wrong answer by docking you -.25 points. The LSAT, however, doesn't differentiate between a wrong answer and a skipped question. I think it was pretty clear that's what I was referring to.

User avatar
Sell Manilla

Bronze
Posts: 206
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 10:08 pm

Re: Improving on the LSAT

Post by Sell Manilla » Sat Jul 24, 2010 8:57 pm

@bleu: I love you now

@Sulla: normally I would nitpick here, but I just finished half a glass of wine & am about to go have dinner, so let's just say I love you too. :wink:

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”