Improving on the LSAT Forum
-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:59 pm
Improving on the LSAT
What does everyone think is a reasonable amount to improve on your real LSAT from your diagnostic? i.e. if I got a 155 on my diag what should I shoot for on my actual test?
- Sell Manilla
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 10:08 pm
Re: Improving on the LSAT
I have no idea what the average or common consensus is, but I think "diagnostics" are a terrible idea, & are actually a misnomer.
Read the Powerscore bibles for games & reasoning, take un-timed tests and slowly work up your speed while answering every question. Eventually make the transition to a timed test. Count your second timed test as a "diagnostic". I don't see the utility in rushing into a number before it's even vaguely representative of where you stand.
You still have dozens of practice tests left to improve your timing & weak points.
Edit: a mod might consider moving this to LSAT prep?
Read the Powerscore bibles for games & reasoning, take un-timed tests and slowly work up your speed while answering every question. Eventually make the transition to a timed test. Count your second timed test as a "diagnostic". I don't see the utility in rushing into a number before it's even vaguely representative of where you stand.
You still have dozens of practice tests left to improve your timing & weak points.
Edit: a mod might consider moving this to LSAT prep?
- Patriot1208
- Posts: 7023
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am
Re: Improving on the LSAT
wrong thread
- SullaFelix
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:18 pm
Re: Improving on the LSAT
180.glcoupe wrote:What does everyone think is a reasonable amount to improve on your real LSAT from your diagnostic? i.e. if I got a 155 on my diag what should I shoot for on my actual test?
There's no real sense in setting a target number on a test that doesn't penalize wrong answers. Just keep at it — there's a lot of time to go.
- Sell Manilla
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 10:08 pm
Re: Improving on the LSAT
...unless you get more than two-ish answers wrong...SullaFelix wrote:There's no real sense in setting a target number on a test that doesn't penalize wrong answers.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- bleu
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 5:01 pm
Re: Improving on the LSAT
--ImageRemoved--Patriot1208 wrote:wrong thread
lol
- SullaFelix
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:18 pm
Re: Improving on the LSAT
Some standardized tests — for example, the SATs, which I'm sure most of us took — penalize you for a wrong answer by docking you -.25 points. The LSAT, however, doesn't differentiate between a wrong answer and a skipped question. I think it was pretty clear that's what I was referring to.Sell Manilla wrote:...unless you get more than two-ish answers wrong...SullaFelix wrote:There's no real sense in setting a target number on a test that doesn't penalize wrong answers.
- Sell Manilla
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 10:08 pm
Re: Improving on the LSAT
@bleu: I love you now
@Sulla: normally I would nitpick here, but I just finished half a glass of wine & am about to go have dinner, so let's just say I love you too.
@Sulla: normally I would nitpick here, but I just finished half a glass of wine & am about to go have dinner, so let's just say I love you too.
