Conflicting Advice Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
Icculus

Silver
Posts: 1410
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 12:02 am

Conflicting Advice

Post by Icculus » Wed Jul 21, 2010 12:03 am

I am friends with a lawyer who graduated from New England, and have been arguing with her for the past two months about whether to retake the LSAT. I scored a 165, and am aiming to score a 170+. She seems to think that a retake will, "do no good, law schools will see both scores and a higher score will not help that much." This is from a discussion tonight. I am positive that a retake is the right move, especially considering the low amount of studying I did the first time through. The question, I guess, is why would someone who spends their time teaching the LSAT and bar have such a different take than most people I've spoken to here? Is it that big of a secret that law schools usually take the highest score as opposed to averaging?

User avatar
dub

New
Posts: 73
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 9:05 pm

Re: Conflicting Advice

Post by dub » Wed Jul 21, 2010 12:19 am

Retake.

User avatar
Sh@keNb@ke

Bronze
Posts: 287
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 3:54 am

Re: Conflicting Advice

Post by Sh@keNb@ke » Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:12 am

dub wrote:Retake.
+1

User avatar
NU_Jet55

Silver
Posts: 976
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 6:54 pm

Re: Conflicting Advice

Post by NU_Jet55 » Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:14 am

dub wrote:Retake.
Titcr

/thread

User avatar
Na_Swatch

Bronze
Posts: 467
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 4:40 pm

Re: Conflicting Advice

Post by Na_Swatch » Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:16 am

mjcaccio wrote:I am friends with a lawyer who graduated from New England, and have been arguing with her for the past two months about whether to retake the LSAT. I scored a 165, and am aiming to score a 170+. She seems to think that a retake will, "do no good, law schools will see both scores and a higher score will not help that much." This is from a discussion tonight. I am positive that a retake is the right move, especially considering the low amount of studying I did the first time through. The question, I guess, is why would someone who spends their time teaching the LSAT and bar have such a different take than most people I've spoken to here? Is it that big of a secret that law schools usually take the highest score as opposed to averaging?
The reason for this is due to the fact that the shift to considering only the highest LSAT score is a relatively recent move for most schools. Just 5 years ago multiple scores were weighed a lot more heavily by a lot more schools than today.

This is probably why people who are lawyers or have been teaching for a while have a different take as they aren't as familiar with the new system.

Same issue arises with all those people who got hired before ITE.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”