LR Question Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply
stonto

New
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 2:44 pm

LR Question

Post by stonto » Tue Jul 13, 2010 10:19 pm

Practice test 11, section 4, question 14. I originally chose answer A (the correct answer), but then changed it because I felt that the wording made it seem as if there was causality between social science and paranoia in films (ie trends in social science cause the images of paranoia in films). Is this just a mistake on my part on what the word reflect means? Does reflect simply mean correlation?
Also, I ended up choosing answer D, and can't quite figure out why it is incorrect. Anybody got a good explanation? Thanks for the help.

stonto

New
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 2:44 pm

Re: LR Question

Post by stonto » Tue Jul 13, 2010 11:16 pm

bump

stonto

New
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 2:44 pm

Re: LR Question

Post by stonto » Wed Jul 14, 2010 9:04 am

bumpppppp

User avatar
SentinelsOfEvil

Bronze
Posts: 124
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:24 pm

Re: LR Question

Post by SentinelsOfEvil » Wed Jul 14, 2010 12:38 pm

please post the question and the options, not just the question number

lparker

Bronze
Posts: 148
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 10:14 am

Re: LR Question

Post by lparker » Wed Jul 14, 2010 1:01 pm

The social scientists changed their views of paranoia from "ungrounded fear" to "a response to real threats." Consequently, the films reflected the change. There is nothing in the stimulus to support that it is the paranoia that is changing--only the views of social scientists and the portrayal in film. (this is why D is incorrect)

So, what you know is that in the 1960's the feeling of powerlessness was dominant in film, and in the 1970s paranoia was shown as a legitimate response to a world gone mad. Both different portrayals, and answer choice A says exactly that.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
3|ink

Platinum
Posts: 7393
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:23 pm

Re: LR Question

Post by 3|ink » Wed Jul 14, 2010 2:39 pm

SentinelsOfEvil wrote:please post the question and the options, not just the question number
Don't listen to this guy.

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... =6&t=36019

stonto

New
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 2:44 pm

Re: LR Question

Post by stonto » Wed Jul 14, 2010 3:27 pm

So are you saying that answer A only implies correlation and not causation?

lparker

Bronze
Posts: 148
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 10:14 am

Re: LR Question

Post by lparker » Wed Jul 14, 2010 3:44 pm

That's how I understand it. "Reflect" is not causal language. In a causal relationship the cause has to make the effect occur. Reflect just shows/mirrors--it doesn't actually induce a change.

stonto

New
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 2:44 pm

Re: LR Question

Post by stonto » Wed Jul 14, 2010 4:14 pm

Alright now I understand it. Thanks a lot!

Ndkrto

New
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 9:10 am

Re: LR Question

Post by Ndkrto » Wed Jul 14, 2010 4:26 pm

Yeah, looking at the answer choices only A or D are remotely possible. Although the interpretation or thoughts behind paranoia are stated to have changed over time, at no point does the passage actually state that "paranoia" changed at all, which D would indicate.

Always go with your first guess. Unless that's wrong.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”