Ragged will tell you your LSAT score (for June takers... ) Forum

[Hey-O]

This is a great thread idea. I need a pick me up as well.

PT Average: ?? I don't know. Usually 170+ (Once I got a 179! But only once - I think it was fluke).

Test: Good except for LG. I messed up on the second game and only had fifteen minutes for the last two games combined.

[Ragged]

This is a great thread idea. I need a pick me up as well.

PT Average: ?? I don't know. Usually 170+ (Once I got a 179! But only once - I think it was fluke).

Test: Good except for LG. I messed up on the second game and only had fifteen minutes for the last two games combined.

164, gonna have to retake.



Nah seriously, 172+ fifteen minutes for two games isnt't that bad, espessially if you managed to quickly crack the mulch.

[Ragged]

I like your optimism, Ragged, but I fear you're going to have some dissatisfied customers in a day or two. haha

The point is for the people to spend just a few days in a good mood. Look how happy you were when I gave you my prediction.

But then again a path to hell is paved with good intentions or something or other.

[1991]

On one thread Ragged told me I'd break 170, and on another he told me I got 150.

[Ragged]

On one thread Ragged told me I'd break 170, and on another he told me I got 150.

I was prolly joking about the 170, or the 150 I'm not sure anymore.

[1991]

On one thread Ragged told me I'd break 170, and on another he told me I got 150.

I was prolly joking about the 170, or the 150 I'm not sure anymore.

Whichever my score is of the two, I'd be very much like my current avatar.

[12262010]

Tell me a bit about your experience of the test and your PTs and I will let you know what you have...

Go.

share with me motherfucker.

[12262010]

This is a great thread idea. I need a pick me up as well.

PT Average: ?? I don't know. Usually 170+ (Once I got a 179! But only once - I think it was fluke).

Test: Good except for LG. I messed up on the second game and only had fifteen minutes for the last two games combined.

169

[Ragged]

Tell me a bit about your experience of the test and your PTs and I will let you know what you have...

Go.

share with me motherfucker.

Fine. I grant you the authority to predict scores when I'm not around.

[aas911]

I can't take the waiting any longer. Oh mystical Ragged, please look into your crystal ball and tell me how I scored!

First PT (cold): 150

PT scores in order: 150, 151, 152, 160, 161, 162, 160, 166, 162

I studied extensively through a Testmasters course and took all of the most recent practice tests that were available.

I drank heavily two days before the test. On the day of the test I psyched myself out, thinking that the drinking would somehow hinder my score.

Overall, I felt like I scored "ok" on this test (aside from the fact that I was unable to finish the RC section which is normally my worst section anyway).

[Ragged]

I can't take the waiting any longer. Oh mystical Ragged, please look into your crystal ball and tell me how I scored!

First PT (cold): 150

PT scores in order: 150, 151, 152, 160, 161, 162, 160, 166, 162

I studied extensively through a Testmasters course and took all of the most recent practice tests that were available.

I drank heavily two days before the test. On the day of the test I psyched myself out, thinking that the drinking would somehow hinder my score.

Overall, I felt like I scored "ok" on this test (aside from the fact that I was unable to finish the RC section which is normally my worst section anyway).

Should have drank heavily the morning of or atleast the night before the test. Can't believe they didn't teach you that at Testmasters. But since you felt "ok" I guess atleast a 160.

[Chimica]

Upon consideration and even though it would suck, I think I would prefer sub 165. If I get less than 165, I re-write with no question. If I get above 170, I'm happy. If I get 165-170 I'm just in a quagmire of indecision as to rewrite or not.

My school of choice takes the best score and a 165 would get me in (I think), but I wanted to kill the test (for me, that is a 170+, for others I know it isn't). It's just a pride thing.

[greg11a]

Ill bite since I cant wait 2-5 more days for my score.

Feb '10 - 162 with minimal prep and had to guess on 6 LG ?'s

After feb did LG bible and about 50 preptests, averaging 168.

Guessed on 3 questions in LG(got the rest right though) and screwed up the following LR, which luckily was the experimental LR. Felt confident about everything else, especially the RC.

Your story inspires confidance. 170 at atleast for you. I'd give my right arm to get atleast 2 correct on that last game.

I'll do the rest later. I need to regain my mana.

Thanks Ragged, your guess was spot on, if it wasn't for the fact I decided to erase my correct answer on Section 1 , question 11 and mysteriously leave all the circles blank, thus resulting in a 169.

[Hey-O]

You got my score right, too. 172.

[Chimica]

I'll bite

Cold diagnostic 160 (but it wasn't an actual LSAT test, it was stupidity McGraw Hill)
Studied a bit and took the June 2007-170-I was happy, as I had a month befor the test and my LG were the weakest section

After that
165, 167, 177 (compilation test-I pulled the LG from the easy, easy 40s, as I had already done the LG for that test) 166, 164

Based on that and bunches of seperate sections------>Never did get LG (-5 to -1 on timed tests), LR was OK (-3 on average) RC was awesome (-1/0) until I hit the 50's (-5/-6)

Test day LR-OK now that I know the experimental section (unsure on 5-8) LG-*SOB* messed up game 2 somehow-squint and guess on 4-8 questions, RC first three section were OK, last was impossible and rushed (5 minutes for whole thing...).

I was hoping for 170+, assumed I'd get 165+ and the whole thing felt like a 160.

Rewrite-here I come!

You definatly got atleast a 165. You feel worse because of the guesses and feeling rushed. I bet you did much better than how you feel. My last LSAT I thought I could have gotten a 162, but ended up with a 170.[/quote]

166