How well do you think you did on June 2010 LSAT? Forum

[HiLine]

Some of us feel the LG was killer despite some people claiming the section was one of the easiest they ever saw. Some complain about the RC, which has been a trend for the most recent preptests. No matter how confident or disappointed we feel about our performance today, at least the test is over now! Some of us are considering cancelling while others are waiting in pain to know their scores. A good score can open many doors, but even a less-than-ideal one wouldn't completely shut the doors to us. No matter how we did on this test, there's nothing we can do about it now! It is all over! Tell us then, how well you think you did on the LSAT today. Throw in your most optimistic guess, your absolutely desperate speculation, or a totally random guess - it's your choice! This thread is intended to give us test-takers a relief from the LSAT stress we've been bearing for the last few months. If you think you bombed the test - say it, scream it loud once and for all! If you believe without doubt that you aced all the sections - let us rejoice with you! Give us your best guess and then forget about the LSAT till June 28 or so forth.

[kkklick]

I messed up the last logic game hard. And it was my best section, and I'm not just saying that. Usually get max 1 wrong, but likely got -5 or -6. I am praying for a 163.

[PlugInBaby]

Honestly I'd have to select at least four of those ranges.

[HiLine]

I just added the cancel option. Could those of you that voted before 0:36 vote again? Thanks.

[Ragged]

Because of the game 4 I say 170-172. Had I cracked that game I'd say 178-180...

[jamlip]

I truly have no clue...could be anywhere within a wide range. I feel like I really blew it on RC and somewhat on LG. Needless to say, I'll most likely be canceling and re-taking in October.

[suspicious android]

I really don't know.. I'd say 172-178. If my 50/50 guess on the last RC was right, if I did as well as I think I did on LR, then maybe the damage from the intern games (blind guessed on two, only eliminated two answers on the last question, maybe fucked the first question) doesn't matter. If the curve is decent, maybe a bit generous...

Well, that's a lot of ifs.

[kkklick]

I really don't know.. I'd say 172-178. If my 50/50 guess on the last RC was right, if I did as well as I think I did on LR, then maybe the damage from the intern games (blind guessed on two, only eliminated two answers on the last question, maybe fucked the first question) doesn't matter. If the curve is decent, maybe a bit generous...

Well, that's a lot of ifs.

If the above poster's statements are true, which of the following must also be true?

You f***ed up.

[suspicious android]

If the above poster's statements are true, which of the following must also be true?

You f***ed up.

you're allowed to say 'fucked', this is not a kindergarten. And I'll deal with my 99th percentile score okay, even if it's a lower 99th percentile than I would have hoped.

[Dr. Strangelove]

*shrug*

LG (-0)
RC (-2)
LR (-8.....)

whatever 90 is- give or take 5.
LR can go to hell.

[adamquigley9]

Not terrible, but I have a suspicion that I'll be seeing the LSAT again in October...

I felt really good about the RC section, and my test had a second RC section, felt good about that one also...either way RC wasn't a problem.
LR was a bit tougher than I was expecting, I'm sure I missed 7-8 combined.
LG can suck it. Seems to be a common thing here, glad to see I'm not alone. I was in the range of missing 2-3 per PT, pretty sure I got about 9-10 wrong on this one...the last game totally killed me.

Luckily I'll have four months to re-group and retake if necessary

[rBoogie81]

Hello everyone. I'm new to TLS. I canceled my scores already. I know I bombed it. I didn't even get the chance to complete 1 LR and 1 RC section. Now that I am really putting effort into preparing for this, my first hard learned lesson was about time. It's amazing how a lengthy test can feel like it goes by so fast. I was a fool to think that just 2 weeks of prep would be enough.

[dub]

If the above poster's statements are true, which of the following must also be true?

You f***ed up.

you're allowed to say 'fucked', this is not a kindergarten. And I'll deal with my 99th percentile score okay, even if it's a lower 99th percentile than I would have hoped.

inb4 this nerd cries

[planQ]

Thought the LR was pretty easy, only one or two ones when i was kind of torn between two hard answers.

Reading comp was really easy i thought, not more then one that i was not fairly certain of. (i hope!!)

LG was not my friend. I like the second(graded) one better then the experimental, but was not a fan, especially the the 4th game...i felt like i missed a big deduction.

Oh well, i might be seeing mister LSAT again in october!

[Knock]

I put the choice of 170-172. We will see.

[splitterhopeful]

Better be a 165-169...at LEAST

[balzern]

Because of the last game and last RC passage I am afraid but hopefully I can pull a 159...

[shoop]

It is inconceivable that I will score less than 174. Might even be higher if the people squalling about "field" are representative of a large fraction of test takers who will all bomb that game and loosen up the curve for the people who completed that game in the only way that actually makes sense.

[theZeigs]

I put the choice of 170-172. We will see.

Ha! Totally calling you out buddy. Average going in was like 6 points higher than this.

*Knocking on wood regardless*

[alicrimson]

Better be atleast a 160 or bring on the tears and razorblades. Just kidding. Kind of. Either way, I have the sinking feeling October is fast approaching.

[malfurion]

It is inconceivable that I will score less than 174. Might even be higher if the people squalling about "field" are representative of a large fraction of test takers who will all bomb that game and loosen up the curve for the people who completed that game in the only way that actually makes sense.

The curve is already determined before the test is administered; the actual performance of test takers cannot impact it.

[CryingMonkey]

It is inconceivable that I will score less than 174. Might even be higher if the people squalling about "field" are representative of a large fraction of test takers who will all bomb that game and loosen up the curve for the people who completed that game in the only way that actually makes sense.

You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

I felt really good about this test, particularly with that first LG being the experimental, but I've seen too many freak things happen to put too much confidence in guesses. For the moment, I'll go with - I answered all the questions on all the sections, and I was fairly confident in all of my answers. So that could be a 180, it could be a 167. I'm pegging my best bet at 178.

*Fingers crossed*

[hobbsey]

I picked 165-169, which is realistic. I think if the curve is -11 or better and I didn't get more than -5 on LG then I could make it to 170 since I feel good about LR and RC.

[Bildungsroman]

Probably 167 - 168. Except for the 4th game I was confident on everything on that test.

[d34d9823]

I have no clue. Could be anywhere from a 170 to a 180. *fingers crossed for score release*