Figuring out the experimental section Forum
- justinmcl
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 3:32 am
Re: Figuring out the experimental section
The squeaky floor ninja question does exist! It made my day while struggling through that LR section.
- malfurion
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 5:40 pm
Re: Figuring out the experimental section
It's not. I only had 2 LR sections and I had that one.Chimica wrote:
Really hoping oil/seals is exp.
- Sammi
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 2:52 pm
Re: Figuring out the experimental section
Do you remember any more questions that you had in that section? I remember the seals, but I can't remember if I had it first or third...malfurion wrote:It's not. I only had 2 LR sections and I had that one.Chimica wrote:
Really hoping oil/seals is exp.
-
- Posts: 1879
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:52 pm
Re: Figuring out the experimental section
I thought it was otters?Sammi wrote:Do you remember any more questions that you had in that section? I remember the seals, but I can't remember if I had it first or third...malfurion wrote:It's not. I only had 2 LR sections and I had that one.Chimica wrote:
Really hoping oil/seals is exp.
- Sammi
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 2:52 pm
Re: Figuring out the experimental section
Probably... I know I had the oil/seals or otters or whatever--it was an evaluative question. I just want to know what other topics for questions that y'all had so I can figure out which LR (1 or 2) was experimental for me.d34dluk3 wrote:I thought it was otters?Sammi wrote:Do you remember any more questions that you had in that section? I remember the seals, but I can't remember if I had it first or third...malfurion wrote:It's not. I only had 2 LR sections and I had that one.Chimica wrote:
Really hoping oil/seals is exp.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1879
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:52 pm
Re: Figuring out the experimental section
Off the top of my head (I had RC as exp.):Sammi wrote:Probably... I know I had the oil/seals or otters or whatever--it was an evaluative question. I just want to know what other topics for questions that y'all had so I can figure out which LR (1 or 2) was experimental for me.
- oil and otters
- natural selection and rapid mutation
- oranges and pots
- twins and genetics
- underground bands
- iron and magnets
- bus driver's liability
My brain is so fried I have no clue which sections these were in.
- Sammi
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 2:52 pm
Re: Figuring out the experimental section
So all in all... it looks like my first LR was experimental? ... I am also completely unable to remember "when" something occurred if it was before the break. Did you have the one about the black hole? That was in the first section I think... and I thought I had seals first, but you had the mammals section and I could have sworn I had that one third.d34dluk3 wrote:Off the top of my head (I had RC as exp.):Sammi wrote:Probably... I know I had the oil/seals or otters or whatever--it was an evaluative question. I just want to know what other topics for questions that y'all had so I can figure out which LR (1 or 2) was experimental for me.
- oil and otters
- natural selection and rapid mutation (2nd!)--no one could remember this one when I talked about it before. All the answer stems had gorillas/apes/horses/animals or some such language over and over in it.
- oranges and pots
- twins and genetics
[strike]- underground bands[/strike] (3rd)
- iron and magnets
- bus driver's liability
My brain is so fried I have no clue which sections these were in.
Oh well. Perhaps I won't figure it out until the score is released.
- malfurion
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 5:40 pm
Re: Figuring out the experimental section
I can't remember which ones were in which sections, but some others I had were the ring around black hole, bus driver accident, identical twins, orange/peppermint for insomniacs, managers who worked in sales dept > 1 year, and something causing damage to commercial fishing and a petition regarding it.Sammi wrote:Do you remember any more questions that you had in that section? I remember the seals, but I can't remember if I had it first or third...malfurion wrote:It's not. I only had 2 LR sections and I had that one.Chimica wrote:
Really hoping oil/seals is exp.
And yeah, I think it was actually otters not seals.
Oh yeah, mushrooms that help fight cancer, underground bands too.
Last edited by malfurion on Tue Jun 08, 2010 3:12 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 1879
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:52 pm
Re: Figuring out the experimental section
I had black holes. My natural selection wasn't about mammals though - it was a choose the most similar reasoning problem and the answer choices were about banks and children studying and stuff.Sammi wrote:So all in all... it looks like my first LR was experimental? ... I am also completely unable to remember "when" something occurred if it was before the break. Did you have the one about the black hole? That was in the first section I think... and I thought I had seals first, but you had the mammals section and I could have sworn I had that one third.d34dluk3 wrote:Off the top of my head (I had RC as exp.):Sammi wrote:Probably... I know I had the oil/seals or otters or whatever--it was an evaluative question. I just want to know what other topics for questions that y'all had so I can figure out which LR (1 or 2) was experimental for me.
- oil and otters
- natural selection and rapid mutation (2nd!)--no one could remember this one when I talked about it before. All the answer stems had gorillas/apes/horses/animals or some such language over and over in it.
- oranges and pots
- twins and genetics
[strike]- underground bands[/strike] (3rd)
- iron and magnets
- bus driver's liability
My brain is so fried I have no clue which sections these were in.
Oh well. Perhaps I won't figure it out until the score is released.
- Sammi
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 2:52 pm
Re: Figuring out the experimental section
Ok. so my FIRST section was real, and 3rd (2nd LR) was experimental.
Those of you who had two LGs... did you have the real LG first?
Mine went LR LG LR RC LR
...is it true that we all take our experimental section at the same time (during the same section) of the test? So everyone's section one or three was experimental?
Those of you who had two LGs... did you have the real LG first?
Mine went LR LG LR RC LR
...is it true that we all take our experimental section at the same time (during the same section) of the test? So everyone's section one or three was experimental?
-
- Posts: 1879
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:52 pm
Re: Figuring out the experimental section
My first was experimental.Sammi wrote:Ok. so my FIRST section was real, and 3rd (2nd LR) was experimental.
Those of you who had two LGs... did you have the real LG first?
Mine went LR LG LR RC LR
...is it true that we all take our experimental section at the same time (during the same section) of the test? So everyone's section one or three was experimental?
- Kchuck
- Posts: 187
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 1:49 am
Re: Figuring out the experimental section
All three of your LR sections had 25 questions, correct?d34dluk3 wrote:My first was experimental.Sammi wrote:Ok. so my FIRST section was real, and 3rd (2nd LR) was experimental.
Those of you who had two LGs... did you have the real LG first?
Mine went LR LG LR RC LR
...is it true that we all take our experimental section at the same time (during the same section) of the test? So everyone's section one or three was experimental?
- PrayingforHYS
- Posts: 303
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:37 pm
Re: Figuring out the experimental section
If you had 3 LR sections and one of them had 26 Qs, then that one was DEFINITELY the experimental.
There were 27 RC, 23 LG, and I had 3 sections of LR that each had 25 Qs -- therefore, the real test has 100 Qs, so anyone with an LR of 26 questions had THAT one as an experimental.
For myself, however, and anyone else who had 3 LRs with 25 each, the only thing we know for certain is that the last (5th) section counted
Besides that, we can speculate all we want, but we can't be certain whether the 1st or 2nd LR was experimental. In fact, for some people, I wouldn't be surprised if the 1st LR they took (1st section overall) was experimental, while the 2nd LR (3rd section overall) was the experimental for others.
My brain hurts too much to even continue speculating, so I'm just gonna wait for my results and shut up until then lol
There were 27 RC, 23 LG, and I had 3 sections of LR that each had 25 Qs -- therefore, the real test has 100 Qs, so anyone with an LR of 26 questions had THAT one as an experimental.
For myself, however, and anyone else who had 3 LRs with 25 each, the only thing we know for certain is that the last (5th) section counted
Besides that, we can speculate all we want, but we can't be certain whether the 1st or 2nd LR was experimental. In fact, for some people, I wouldn't be surprised if the 1st LR they took (1st section overall) was experimental, while the 2nd LR (3rd section overall) was the experimental for others.
My brain hurts too much to even continue speculating, so I'm just gonna wait for my results and shut up until then lol
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- upfish
- Posts: 507
- Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:51 pm
Re: Figuring out the experimental section
SO glad to hear that 4 Cs is credited. =D
And the RC seemed breezy to me?
But I definitely bombed the games. God, for the 1st LG section to have been real. >.<
And the RC seemed breezy to me?
But I definitely bombed the games. God, for the 1st LG section to have been real. >.<
- Chimica
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 3:30 pm
Re: Figuring out the experimental section
Yes it was otters ( not seals)
However, I can't remember if the otters were with iron/magnets or not (I had LR (Easy-first Q was iron-magnets), LG (interns-mulch), LR (can't remember a damn thing, but this hurt me)-BREAK-LR (also cannot remember) RC(Australian tax law, theatre, honeybees, urban)
However, I can't remember if the otters were with iron/magnets or not (I had LR (Easy-first Q was iron-magnets), LG (interns-mulch), LR (can't remember a damn thing, but this hurt me)-BREAK-LR (also cannot remember) RC(Australian tax law, theatre, honeybees, urban)
- PrayingforHYS
- Posts: 303
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:37 pm
Re: Figuring out the experimental section
Careful with your words, but I'm glad that that's credited as well. I saw that on my booklet, and I was like "huh..?" -- it's not unprecedented for that to happen + the fact that I believe that those responses were very early in the section. I looked at that for about 3 seconds, decided, "eh, it's either right or wrong...but i can't worry about it now" and then I proceeded from there.upfish wrote:SO glad to hear that 4 Cs is credited. =D
And the RC seemed breezy to me?
But I definitely bombed the games. God, for the 1st LG section to have been real. >.<
Luckily, it appears that it's ok.
-
- Posts: 1879
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:52 pm
Re: Figuring out the experimental section
Yeah, I think 5 has never happened, but 4 has happened several times IIRC.PrayingforHYS wrote:Careful with your words, but I'm glad that that's credited as well. I saw that on my booklet, and I was like "huh..?" -- it's not unprecedented for that to happen + the fact that I believe that those responses were very early in the section. I looked at that for about 3 seconds, decided, "eh, it's either right or wrong...but i can't worry about it now" and then I proceeded from there.upfish wrote:SO glad to hear that 4 Cs is credited. =D
And the RC seemed breezy to me?
But I definitely bombed the games. God, for the 1st LG section to have been real. >.<
Luckily, it appears that it's ok.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Chimica
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 3:30 pm
Re: Figuring out the experimental section
Now I'm confused. So you had no LR experimental and you had questions on both iron/magnets and otters/oil.d34dluk3 wrote:Off the top of my head (I had RC as exp.):Sammi wrote:Probably... I know I had the oil/seals or otters or whatever--it was an evaluative question. I just want to know what other topics for questions that y'all had so I can figure out which LR (1 or 2) was experimental for me.
- oil and otters-3
- natural selection and rapid mutation
- oranges and pots
- twins and genetics
- underground bands-4
- iron and magnets-1
- bus driver's liability
My brain is so fried I have no clue which sections these were in.
I thought the general consensus was that those were in two different sections (1 and 3, respectively for most people). I personally cannot remember if they were split. The only thing I'm sure of is that magnets was the first question of the test for me.
I've added my best guesses for the sections up above.
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 9:44 pm
Re: Figuring out the experimental section
I think the October 2010 LSAT will have an LG about crazed LSAT takers trying to figure our which was the experimental LR section.
-
- Posts: 1879
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:52 pm
Re: Figuring out the experimental section
Are you sure you're recalling the sections correctly? I only had 2 LRs, so three different sections seems implausible.Chimica wrote:Now I'm confused. So you had no LR experimental and you had questions on both iron/magnets and otters/oil.d34dluk3 wrote:Off the top of my head (I had RC as exp.):Sammi wrote:Probably... I know I had the oil/seals or otters or whatever--it was an evaluative question. I just want to know what other topics for questions that y'all had so I can figure out which LR (1 or 2) was experimental for me.
- oil and otters-3
- natural selection and rapid mutation
- oranges and pots
- twins and genetics
- underground bands-4
- iron and magnets-1
- bus driver's liability
My brain is so fried I have no clue which sections these were in.
I thought the general consensus was that those were in two different sections (1 and 3, respectively for most people). I personally cannot remember if they were split. The only thing I'm sure of is that magnets was the first question of the test for me.
I've added my best guesses for the sections up above.
-
- Posts: 718
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:50 pm
Re: Figuring out the experimental section
I think this was my set up as well. And I think the first LR was experimental but I can't remember. Was your first question about magnets?Sammi wrote:Ok. so my FIRST section was real, and 3rd (2nd LR) was experimental.
Those of you who had two LGs... did you have the real LG first?
Mine went LR LG LR RC LR
...is it true that we all take our experimental section at the same time (during the same section) of the test? So everyone's section one or three was experimental?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- OklahomasOK
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 1:10 pm
Re: Figuring out the experimental section
I noticed lots of quirks with my bubbling on my scantron. I don't want to go into too much detail, but I had an LR section (not exp) where I got a bunch of two letters (as had been echoed by others on TLS).upfish wrote:SO glad to hear that 4 Cs is credited. =D
And the RC seemed breezy to me?
But I definitely bombed the games. God, for the 1st LG section to have been real. >.<
I thought the 3rd LR, was the most difficult one. I spent the entire time on that section... I didn't even have a chance to write "HAMMERTIME" after it says STOP at the end of the section.
- Chimica
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 3:30 pm
Re: Figuring out the experimental section
That's what is confusing me. Several people have posted with iron and otters in different sections. I read that first and it sounded right. Now I cannot remember if they were together or not. If you got them both, then eitherd34dluk3 wrote:Are you sure you're recalling the sections correctly? I only had 2 LRs, so three different sections seems implausible.Chimica wrote:Now I'm confused. So you had no LR experimental and you had questions on both iron/magnets and otters/oil.d34dluk3 wrote:Off the top of my head (I had RC as exp.):Sammi wrote:Probably... I know I had the oil/seals or otters or whatever--it was an evaluative question. I just want to know what other topics for questions that y'all had so I can figure out which LR (1 or 2) was experimental for me.
- oil and otters-3
- natural selection and rapid mutation
- oranges and pots
- twins and genetics
- underground bands-4
- iron and magnets-1
- bus driver's liability
My brain is so fried I have no clue which sections these were in.
I thought the general consensus was that those were in two different sections (1 and 3, respectively for most people). I personally cannot remember if they were split. The only thing I'm sure of is that magnets was the first question of the test for me.
I've added my best guesses for the sections up above.
1) Iron-magnets and otters-oil were together in the same LR and someone just misremembered and split them and we all followed along
or
2) The experimental questions were mixed in with real (unprecedented and unlikely)
or
3) You are messing with us or having oily otter hallucinations (unlikely)
So I'm hoping someone will show up and say that otters and magnets were actually together and that my attributions above are incorrect.
- icanhaz2ndchance
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 5:29 pm
Re: Figuring out the experimental section
For me, I am almost positive otters and magnets were together in the first LR section. Magnets was the very first question and I remember the otter question struck me soon after due to my proximity to the gulf and the current environmental disaster. I had LR AR LR RC LR. The LR sections consisted of 25 26 25 questions, respectively. I am almost positive after reading all of these posts that the second LR section, section 3 overall, was the experimental section. Which is awesome, because I think that was my weakest section.
- zworykin
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 4:18 am
Re: Figuring out the experimental section
I don't remember if they were in the same section, but I had both, magnets was definitely a first question, and I only had two LR sections.icanhaz2ndchance wrote:For me, I am almost positive otters and magnets were together in the first LR section. Magnets was the very first question and I remember the otter question struck me soon after due to my proximity to the gulf and the current environmental disaster. I had LR AR LR RC LR. The LR sections consisted of 25 26 25 questions, respectively. I am almost positive after reading all of these posts that the second LR section, section 3 overall, was the experimental section. Which is awesome, because I think that was my weakest section.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login