PT 58 Section 4 #23 Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
nonamebreakdown

New
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:34 am

PT 58 Section 4 #23

Post by nonamebreakdown » Wed Jun 02, 2010 10:11 pm

I chose A. Apparently, B is the correct answer, but it seems to me like B weakens the conclusion rather than strengthens it.

Conclusion: It was probably a volcano.
Answer choice B) no known natural cause would account for this phenomenon.

Can someone please explain to me how this strengthens the claim that it was a volcano?

User avatar
jpSartre

Bronze
Posts: 326
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 11:05 am

Re: PT 58 Section 4 #23

Post by jpSartre » Wed Jun 02, 2010 10:15 pm

Conclusion: caused by a volcano, not meteors.

B says "no known natural cause would likely account for eight meteorite carters of different ages forming a straight line.

If there's no known way for meteorites to cause the phenomenon, and it was either caused by meteors or a volcano, then it was caused by a volcano.

User avatar
nonamebreakdown

New
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:34 am

Re: PT 58 Section 4 #23

Post by nonamebreakdown » Wed Jun 02, 2010 10:21 pm

jpSartre wrote:Conclusion: caused by a volcano, not meteors.

B says "no known natural cause would likely account for eight meteorite carters of different ages forming a straight line.

If there's no known way for meteorites to cause the phenomenon, and it was either caused by meteors or a volcano, then it was caused by a volcano.

This makes perfect sense. If it was either A or B and it wasn't A, then it was B. Sure. I guess what I'm confused about is...wouldn't volcanic events qualify as a natural cause? If they do, then B weakens the conclusion.

User avatar
jpSartre

Bronze
Posts: 326
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 11:05 am

Re: PT 58 Section 4 #23

Post by jpSartre » Wed Jun 02, 2010 10:39 pm

nonamebreakdown wrote:
jpSartre wrote:Conclusion: caused by a volcano, not meteors.

B says "no known natural cause would likely account for eight meteorite carters of different ages forming a straight line.

If there's no known way for meteorites to cause the phenomenon, and it was either caused by meteors or a volcano, then it was caused by a volcano.

This makes perfect sense. If it was either A or B and it wasn't A, then it was B. Sure. I guess what I'm confused about is...wouldn't volcanic events qualify as a natural cause? If they do, then B weakens the conclusion.
I see what you're saying. But in the answer choice, "natural cause" is qualified to only apply to meteorites. You gotta remember to take it as one phrase: "no natural cause.. for 8 meteorite craters."

It says noting about natural causes for anything but meteorites.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”