I chose A. Apparently, B is the correct answer, but it seems to me like B weakens the conclusion rather than strengthens it.
Conclusion: It was probably a volcano.
Answer choice B) no known natural cause would account for this phenomenon.
Can someone please explain to me how this strengthens the claim that it was a volcano?
PT 58 Section 4 #23 Forum
- jpSartre
- Posts: 326
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 11:05 am
Re: PT 58 Section 4 #23
Conclusion: caused by a volcano, not meteors.
B says "no known natural cause would likely account for eight meteorite carters of different ages forming a straight line.
If there's no known way for meteorites to cause the phenomenon, and it was either caused by meteors or a volcano, then it was caused by a volcano.
B says "no known natural cause would likely account for eight meteorite carters of different ages forming a straight line.
If there's no known way for meteorites to cause the phenomenon, and it was either caused by meteors or a volcano, then it was caused by a volcano.
- nonamebreakdown
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:34 am
Re: PT 58 Section 4 #23
jpSartre wrote:Conclusion: caused by a volcano, not meteors.
B says "no known natural cause would likely account for eight meteorite carters of different ages forming a straight line.
If there's no known way for meteorites to cause the phenomenon, and it was either caused by meteors or a volcano, then it was caused by a volcano.
This makes perfect sense. If it was either A or B and it wasn't A, then it was B. Sure. I guess what I'm confused about is...wouldn't volcanic events qualify as a natural cause? If they do, then B weakens the conclusion.
- jpSartre
- Posts: 326
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 11:05 am
Re: PT 58 Section 4 #23
I see what you're saying. But in the answer choice, "natural cause" is qualified to only apply to meteorites. You gotta remember to take it as one phrase: "no natural cause.. for 8 meteorite craters."nonamebreakdown wrote:jpSartre wrote:Conclusion: caused by a volcano, not meteors.
B says "no known natural cause would likely account for eight meteorite carters of different ages forming a straight line.
If there's no known way for meteorites to cause the phenomenon, and it was either caused by meteors or a volcano, then it was caused by a volcano.
This makes perfect sense. If it was either A or B and it wasn't A, then it was B. Sure. I guess what I'm confused about is...wouldn't volcanic events qualify as a natural cause? If they do, then B weakens the conclusion.
It says noting about natural causes for anything but meteorites.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login