Sufficient--->Necessary with an "unless" clause Forum
-
JDSprintz

- Posts: 12
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 8:42 am
Sufficient--->Necessary with an "unless" clause
Hi everyone,
Hope you are all having a good holiday weekend.
I have a quick question about logic games. One of the rules in the game I am working on is "R is not scheduled for Thursday unless L is scheduled for Monday". So, I took this to mean that if L is scheduled for Monday, then R is scheduled for Thursday. Apparently this is wrong. Can somebody explain why?
Thanks so much.
Hope you are all having a good holiday weekend.
I have a quick question about logic games. One of the rules in the game I am working on is "R is not scheduled for Thursday unless L is scheduled for Monday". So, I took this to mean that if L is scheduled for Monday, then R is scheduled for Thursday. Apparently this is wrong. Can somebody explain why?
Thanks so much.
- iwanta170

- Posts: 445
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 2:27 pm
Re: Sufficient--->Necessary with an "unless" clause
It's because unless always signifies a necessary condition
Hence: If R is scheduled for Thursday, L is scheduled for Monday
Hence: If R is scheduled for Thursday, L is scheduled for Monday
-
005618502

- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:56 pm
Re: Sufficient--->Necessary with an "unless" clause
Iwanta is correct. Unless refers to the result, then you negate the trigger. Pretty good strategy to use
- feeblemiles

- Posts: 111
- Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 6:30 pm
Re: Sufficient--->Necessary with an "unless" clause
R is not scheduled for Thursday unless L is scheduled for Monday.
If L is scheduled for Monday then R could be scheduled for Thursday.
R can only be scheduled for Thursday when L has been scheduled for Monday.
So if R is scheduled for Thursday, then L is scheduled for Monday.
Read unless statements as: if not (whatever came before "unless") then (whatever came after "unless")
So If not (R is not scheduled for Thursday) then (L is scheduled for Monday).
The not R is not scheduled for Thursday portion has two negatives, which cancel out to become R is scheduled for Thursday.
If L is scheduled for Monday then R could be scheduled for Thursday.
R can only be scheduled for Thursday when L has been scheduled for Monday.
So if R is scheduled for Thursday, then L is scheduled for Monday.
Read unless statements as: if not (whatever came before "unless") then (whatever came after "unless")
So If not (R is not scheduled for Thursday) then (L is scheduled for Monday).
The not R is not scheduled for Thursday portion has two negatives, which cancel out to become R is scheduled for Thursday.
-
dakatz

- Posts: 2422
- Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:19 pm
Re: Sufficient--->Necessary with an "unless" clause
I always like to flip the phrase around to a positive form that seems to make sense more quickly to most people. So they tell you:JDSprintz wrote:Hi everyone,
Hope you are all having a good holiday weekend.
I have a quick question about logic games. One of the rules in the game I am working on is "R is not scheduled for Thursday unless L is scheduled for Monday". So, I took this to mean that if L is scheduled for Monday, then R is scheduled for Thursday. Apparently this is wrong. Can somebody explain why?
Thanks so much.
"R is not scheduled for Thursday unless L is scheduled for Monday"
I then say to myself, "so what if R IS scheduled for Thursday?" I flip around the first part of that phrase from "R is not" to "R is". The only way R could possibly be scheduled for Thursday is if L is on Monday. So you get:
If R Thursday ---> L Monday
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
JDSprintz

- Posts: 12
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 8:42 am
Re: Sufficient--->Necessary with an "unless" clause
Ok, so "unless" always refers to the result.
If R is scheduled for Thursday, then L is scheduled for Monday. But L being scheduled for Monday doesn't by itself guarantee R being scheduled for Thursday.
Thanks so much!
If R is scheduled for Thursday, then L is scheduled for Monday. But L being scheduled for Monday doesn't by itself guarantee R being scheduled for Thursday.
Thanks so much!
- dutchstriker

- Posts: 276
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 3:15 pm
Re: Sufficient--->Necessary with an "unless" clause
http://www.top-law-schools.com/conditio ... oning.html
3/4 of the way down that page you'll find a section on "unless" conditional statements. There's also a worksheet if you need additional practice.
3/4 of the way down that page you'll find a section on "unless" conditional statements. There's also a worksheet if you need additional practice.
-
JDSprintz

- Posts: 12
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 8:42 am
Re: Sufficient--->Necessary with an "unless" clause
Thanks for the link!
- HiLine

- Posts: 210
- Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:57 am
Re: Sufficient--->Necessary with an "unless" clause
Think about it this way:
'A happens unless B happens' means that under 'normal' conditions, A will happen. If A does not happen, that is because of the 'effect' of B, so A not happening dictates that B happen. Thus the phrase can be rewritten as:
If A happens, B also happens
or simply:
Not A --> B
Edited: that also means either A happens or B happens or, at least one of A and B must happen, which is quite useful for Logic Games.
'A happens unless B happens' means that under 'normal' conditions, A will happen. If A does not happen, that is because of the 'effect' of B, so A not happening dictates that B happen. Thus the phrase can be rewritten as:
If A happens, B also happens
or simply:
Not A --> B
Edited: that also means either A happens or B happens or, at least one of A and B must happen, which is quite useful for Logic Games.
- BrightLine

- Posts: 259
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Re: Sufficient--->Necessary with an "unless" clause
I dont know why this has to be overly complicated.
"No X unless Y"
If X then there must be Y
AND
If there is no Y then there can be no X
Explanation: There can be no X unless there is Y. So if there is X then it follows that there must be Y.
"No X unless Y"
If X then there must be Y
AND
If there is no Y then there can be no X
Explanation: There can be no X unless there is Y. So if there is X then it follows that there must be Y.
- confusedlawyer

- Posts: 136
- Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 11:21 am
Re: Sufficient--->Necessary with an "unless" clause
What helps me is think of an example in your head.
No X unless Y
X= Omar goes to Vegas
Y= Shawn goes to vegas
Omar does not go to Vegas unless Shawn goes to Vegas
If Omar goes to vegas, Shawn goes to vegas
If shawn does not go to vegas, omar does not go to vegas
WRONG: If Shawn goes to Vegas, Omar goes to vegas
WRONG: If Omar does not go to vegas, Shawn does not go to vegas
Easy as Pie. MMmmm. Could go for a slice right about now
No X unless Y
X= Omar goes to Vegas
Y= Shawn goes to vegas
Omar does not go to Vegas unless Shawn goes to Vegas
If Omar goes to vegas, Shawn goes to vegas
If shawn does not go to vegas, omar does not go to vegas
WRONG: If Shawn goes to Vegas, Omar goes to vegas
WRONG: If Omar does not go to vegas, Shawn does not go to vegas
Easy as Pie. MMmmm. Could go for a slice right about now
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login