Dec. 2009 PT Forum
- jdhopeful11
- Posts: 481
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 3:39 pm
Dec. 2009 PT
Is it me or was this test especially hard?
- confusedlawyer
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 11:21 am
Re: Dec. 2009 PT
Its you. No I'm kidding, did you not look at the curve? 81/101 is a 165. Haven't taken it yet but I am not looking forward to it. What was so hard about it if you don't mind me asking?andyman wrote:Is it me or was this test especially hard?
- jdhopeful11
- Posts: 481
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 3:39 pm
Re: Dec. 2009 PT
I was just brushing up and my PT score dropped from consistently mid 160's to a 155 on this test (all testing conditions being similar) 

- dominkay
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 4:41 pm
Re: Dec. 2009 PT
It was especially hard. My score dropped from consistently mid-170s to 169. I thought the reading comp was ridiculous (I don't remember the last time I got more than -1 on RC).
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 10:20 pm
Re: Dec. 2009 PT
It was significantly harder than average (hence the lovely scoring scale). I hated life when I left the testing center, and I debated canceling up until the very last minute. Very glad I didn't end up making that all-timer of a mistake.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 8:43 pm
Re: Dec. 2009 PT
Yes it's hard! I was reviewing this test tonight also. It was brutal when I took it in Dec.
- lebob
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 5:25 pm
Re: Dec. 2009 PT
dec09 is the reason i need to suffer through this test one last time on june 7th.
LR, LG was doable for me, but the RC. Oh lord, the RC...
LR, LG was doable for me, but the RC. Oh lord, the RC...
-
- Posts: 491
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 1:47 pm
Re: Dec. 2009 PT
When all of you say the test was "hard," are you saying that you had a low raw score but the curve fit the test, or are you saying that you scored lower than usual.
- StrictlyLiable
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 1:34 pm
Re: Dec. 2009 PT
I think that since they say the curve was larger and they scored worse I imagine their raw score was less than usual. I was wondering, what made the RC so much more difficult?
- lebob
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 5:25 pm
Re: Dec. 2009 PT
StrictlyLiable wrote:I think that since they say the curve was larger and they scored worse I imagine their raw score was less than usual. I was wondering, what made the RC so much more difficult?
the questions (not trying to be clever).
the passages were tough, but the questions were even tougher
-
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 2:08 pm
Re: Dec. 2009 PT
Yeah, the third RC passage about Noguchi was kinda hard, but the questions were just atrocious. #16 especially.lebob wrote:StrictlyLiable wrote:I think that since they say the curve was larger and they scored worse I imagine their raw score was less than usual. I was wondering, what made the RC so much more difficult?
the questions (not trying to be clever).
the passages were tough, but the questions were even tougher
-
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 8:43 pm
Re: Dec. 2009 PT
The LG games section was pretty easy compared to other tests I thought. Although, those rule substitution questions kind of threw me for a loop.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login