PT 48 Section 4 Q21 diagram Forum
-
- Posts: 319
- Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 11:18 pm
PT 48 Section 4 Q21 diagram
can anyone diagram this for me?
Thanks!
Thanks!
- Atlas LSAT Teacher
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 10:18 am
Re: PT 48 Section 4 Q21 diagram
Here's a diagram and write-up of the game: http://www.atlaslsat.com/forums/game-4- ... -t264.html (not sure why the formatting on the forum is so wonky, but what you need is there).
I hope that helps.
I hope that helps.
- malfurion
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 5:40 pm
Re: PT 48 Section 4 Q21 diagram
This is a tough question because you can really confuse yourself if you treat "ignore unpleasant realities" and "tell small lies" as two different symbols and start complicating things with ands/ors from contrapositives. If you just treat them as one unit, it becomes pretty simple.
abbreviations:
IRSL - Ignore unpleasant Realities and tell Small Lies
SINC - Sincerity
TR - Trust
SU - Succeed
sentence 1: IRSL --> not SINC
sentence 2: not TR --> not SU
contrapositive of 1: SINC --> not IRSL
contrapositive of 2: SU --> TR
conclusion (sentence 3): SU --> not IRSL
So the missing link is TR --> SINC, which is answer (A)
abbreviations:
IRSL - Ignore unpleasant Realities and tell Small Lies
SINC - Sincerity
TR - Trust
SU - Succeed
sentence 1: IRSL --> not SINC
sentence 2: not TR --> not SU
contrapositive of 1: SINC --> not IRSL
contrapositive of 2: SU --> TR
conclusion (sentence 3): SU --> not IRSL
So the missing link is TR --> SINC, which is answer (A)
- Atlas LSAT Teacher
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 10:18 am
Re: PT 48 Section 4 Q21 diagram
oops, I thought you were asking about a game in that PT. Here's an explanation for the LR question: http://www.atlaslsat.com/forums/pt48-s4 ... -t743.html
That sort of sloppy reading won't do for the LSAT!
That sort of sloppy reading won't do for the LSAT!
-
- Posts: 319
- Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 11:18 pm
Re: PT 48 Section 4 Q21 diagram
hey thank you so much! i wonder how did you translate the first sentence into a conditional statement. honestly, it took me a while to write a conditional statement based on the original sentence. What words make you think it's a conditional statement?
malfurion wrote:This is a tough question because you can really confuse yourself if you treat "ignore unpleasant realities" and "tell small lies" as two different symbols and start complicating things with ands/ors from contrapositives. If you just treat them as one unit, it becomes pretty simple.
abbreviations:
IRSL - Ignore unpleasant Realities and tell Small Lies
SINC - Sincerity
TR - Trust
SU - Succeed
sentence 1: IRSL --> not SINC
sentence 2: not TR --> not SU
contrapositive of 1: SINC --> not IRSL
contrapositive of 2: SU --> TR
conclusion (sentence 3): SU --> not IRSL
So the missing link is TR --> SINC, which is answer (A)
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Atlas LSAT Teacher
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 10:18 am
Re: PT 48 Section 4 Q21 diagram
The signal word is "requiring"
-
- Posts: 319
- Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 11:18 pm
Re: PT 48 Section 4 Q21 diagram
so the prevent A.. by requirting B should be
NO A -> B ??
I guess I'm thinking too much because I thought prevent A doesn't mean no A.
Thanks!
NO A -> B ??
I guess I'm thinking too much because I thought prevent A doesn't mean no A.
Thanks!
Atlas LSAT Teacher wrote:The signal word is "requiring"