PT 53 LR Forum
-
boomer07
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 12:16 pm
PT 53 LR
So i recently finished PT 53 and got destroyed on the LR. I usually average anywhere from -0 to -3 per section usually for a combined LR total of -4. However, on this test, I got -10. Not only that, but i don't even understand why half of them are wrong. I am struggling a little bit with the more recent LR but this is concerning. Did anyone else find LR on PT 53 to be particularly difficult??
-
am060459
- Posts: 609
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 12:14 am
Re: PT 53 LR
i did about average although i thought i was making progress. -7 and -8 (for second lr i had to guess on three and only got one them right) respectively.
anyone else care to rank LR and possibly the other sections for PT 53?
TIA
anyone else care to rank LR and possibly the other sections for PT 53?
TIA
-
hopscotch
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 9:25 am
Re: PT 53 LR
LR1 #6 on this PT is absurdly terrible.
-
JustE
- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:49 pm
Re: PT 53 LR
Just bombed it. LR and RC seemed much worse than usual...
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Obelisk18
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 12:34 pm
Re: PT 53 LR
Yeah, I did awfully on the first LR: -6 which is, to date, my worst LR section. I got 3 in a row wrong at one point. But I missed none in Section 3 so at the time I wrote it off as a case of temporary insanity. And yeah hopscotch, I'm still pretty dubious about that Moral Vacuum/Cruel Herd question.
-
Campagnolo
- Posts: 906
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 5:49 pm
Re: PT 53 LR
I just did this PT yesterday and feel like I have a pretty good handle on it (-1 on the first section, -2 on the second). If you have any specific questions about the section, I'd be happy to help you review.
-
totaltest.milan
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 9:45 pm
Re: PT 53 LR
What did you guys find difficult about this question? I didn't find it markedly more dubious than other strengthen questions, if you'd like I could try and answer any of your questions.hopscotch wrote:LR1 #6 on this PT is absurdly terrible.
Basically B and C were irrelevant (though I can see how someone might find them attractive) and D and E weaken the argument.
-
Bangalmafia
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:47 pm
Re: PT 53 LR
Same... LR wasn't particularly bad on this one.What did you guys find difficult about this question? I didn't find it markedly more dubious than other strengthen questions, if you'd like I could try and answer any of your questions.
Though I got destroyed on LG. *sigh* looks like I am pretty out of practice.
