Ace the LSAT logic games? Forum

[Saltqjibo]

Has anyone used this book? I've been going through their practice questions and finding them much harder than the ones I've encountered on the earlier tests. Are these more representative of the newer style of logic games as they claim? I feel as if they might just be poorly worded and causing unnecessary confusion. I was failry confidant before, but now I'm staring at a game for 15 mins plus...

[Kchuck]

I think that the general consensus around TLS is that the Logic Games Bible, put out by Powerscore, is the best tool for learning the logic games. In my experience, just do as many LG's as you can and you will catch on.

[Saltqjibo]

I've been through that one already. I was just hoping for some extra games questions. I don't know how nervous I should be that my timing has taken a major hit. Ace the LSAT claims to "focus on the game types most seen in recent tests" - or something like that. As of yet I've been studying mostly from the older tests/ avoided doing newer ones in powerscore.

[MChun08]

Personally, I would rather repeat the real logic games before doing fake ones. Unless you are retaking the LSAT for the 3rd time, there's no reason why you would need fake games. Repeat the real ones over and over until you can finish them in 8 minutes and not get any wrong. If you have done that already, then maybe your time would be better spent on LR or RC.

[Saltqjibo]

my problem is that I remember the ones I've allready done too well. The main inference always jumps out at me right away and then I can cruise through with no problems. I have trouble seeing inferences in games I haven't seen before though...

[allison34363]

Can you link to this particular Ace book you're talking about?