Put this premise in Conditional Reasoning Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply
deputamadre

New
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 7:23 pm

Put this premise in Conditional Reasoning

Post by deputamadre » Wed Apr 14, 2010 9:22 pm

"No one who lacks knowledge of a subject is competent to pass judgment on that subject"

I see it this way: If you lack knowledge then you're not competent to pass judgment.

Kaplan has it reversed however, saying "Competence in passing judgment requires knowledge." I would translate this to Competence -------> Knowledge

Someone explain this please.

User avatar
FreeGuy

Bronze
Posts: 130
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 4:42 pm

Re: Put this premise in Conditional Reasoning

Post by FreeGuy » Wed Apr 14, 2010 9:41 pm

deputamadre wrote:"No one who lacks knowledge of a subject is competent to pass judgment on that subject"

I see it this way: If you lack knowledge then you're not competent to pass judgment.

Kaplan has it reversed however, saying "Competence in passing judgment requires knowledge." I would translate this to Competence -------> Knowledge

Someone explain this please.
They didn't reverse it, they just took the contrapositive.

Lack knowledge -> Not competent to pass judgment

Contrapositive:

If you are competent to pass judgment, then you must have knowledge..


Both your translation of the original statement, and the Kaplan version, are valid.

User avatar
yoni45

New
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 2:12 am

Re: Put this premise in Conditional Reasoning

Post by yoni45 » Wed Apr 14, 2010 9:42 pm

deputamadre wrote:"No one who lacks knowledge of a subject is competent to pass judgment on that subject"

I see it this way: If you lack knowledge then you're not competent to pass judgment.

Kaplan has it reversed however, saying "Competence in passing judgment requires knowledge." I would translate this to Competence -------> Knowledge

Someone explain this please.
You're both right -- Kaplan doesn't have it reversed, it just has it presented in terms of the contrapositive... =)

Yours: If you lack knowledge then you're not competent to pass judgment.
Symbolized: ~Knowledge --> ~Competence

Kaplan: Competence in passing judgment requires knowledge.
Symbolized: Competence --> Knowledge

EDIT: What he said... ^_^

deputamadre

New
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 7:23 pm

Re: Put this premise in Conditional Reasoning

Post by deputamadre » Wed Apr 14, 2010 9:51 pm

Wow. Guess my mind was worn after 3.5 of hours of flaw questions. Thanks guys

User avatar
theZeigs

Bronze
Posts: 150
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 3:26 pm

Re: Put this premise in Conditional Reasoning

Post by theZeigs » Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:23 pm

See here too:

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 6&t=110024

I had to struggle through this. Going to add to that particular post in the next few days with some further thoughts, etc.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”