. Forum
- FreeGuy
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 4:42 pm
Re: New LR on recent exams?
This.TUP wrote:Or just subjectively more difficult questions?
-
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 6:58 pm
Re: New LR on recent exams?
Hard to pinpoint, but this is what I've noticed. Vocabulary is more complicated, arguments are more obscure and vague.TUP wrote:Or just subjectively more difficult questions?
Try it for yourself -- take a section/PT from ~ 35-45 and then compare it to a section/PT from ~ 56 to the present. You'll understand.
- TUP
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 1:00 am
Re: New LR on recent exams?
I'll take a look at a more recent section. After reading through a few posts it seems like not everyone agrees when or even if LR is more difficult.
-
- Posts: 269
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:04 pm
Re: New LR on recent exams?
I, for one. There's been some apparent streamlining of the logic games through the 2000's, but I actually thought the June 2007 LR sections were easier than on some of the earlier PT's.
Overall, though, the LR part of the LSAT has stayed remarkably stable.
Overall, though, the LR part of the LSAT has stayed remarkably stable.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 10751
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: New LR on recent exams?
I found the new ones to be more tricky therefore difficult. One the highest difficulty ones, once you narrowed down to 2 answers, they frequently make the non-credited answer appears to be more right by mismatching certain words, phrases and such. The result is you feel that one answer is more correct than the other, but the one you feel correct is really related to the question even though the content of it makes sense. I didn't see that in the older tests.
- quasi-stellar
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 12:14 pm
Re: New LR on recent exams?
I've noticed that on the earlier exams as well. I frequently made mistakes on those questions that I narrowed done to two possible answers. It is almost like the credited responses seem counterintuitive, but they turn out to be correct.r6_philly wrote:I found the new ones to be more tricky therefore difficult. One the highest difficulty ones, once you narrowed down to 2 answers, they frequently make the non-credited answer appears to be more right by mismatching certain words, phrases and such. The result is you feel that one answer is more correct than the other, but the one you feel correct is really related to the question even though the content of it makes sense. I didn't see that in the older tests.
Don't forget that test developers are excellent psychometricians and they have always used that trap.