Yeah, 32 days is what freaked me out. I just don't see that happening again, though.CookieDough wrote:I'm sure, but a girl can dream! Also, as long as it's not 32 days I should be okay...snagglepuss wrote:I think the pattern shifted 2 years ago or something like that. So I imagine the wait will be 25-27 days.CookieDough wrote: Good news is they do get released VERY early sometimes http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-S0Y2OxLmA7U/U ... +Dates.png
Post removed. Forum
-
- Posts: 1957
- Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2013 4:16 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
- bbkk
- Posts: 728
- Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:28 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
I just did!snagglepuss wrote:. Any one else celebrating Halloween with hours of LSAT prep?

I think new/used CDs is fine - nailed it at first attempt. But 68.4 is another story. Even after repeating multiple times (>5), it's still hard to keep it under 8:30 mins.bee wrote:I LOVE NEW/USED CDS!!!!! its one of my favsPourMeTea wrote:Confession: I have never finished new/used CDs. I think that is the hardest game.
But idk, I got really good at games after I started making up my own for fun.
i have never done 68.4 in less than1114 mins

Post it here please tea! I wanna try it!PourMeTea wrote: I made another one about items my roommate leaves in the freezer, it had 7 qs.
ETA: I agree that retakers are indeed very different from first-time takers. I hope this thread survive...Wait, what am I talking about? With Tea + Bee + WTR + all other Oct takers/megapoasters, there is absolutely NO CHANCE that this thread is going to die.

- retaking23
- Posts: 452
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 10:34 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
I'm just about to start posting my daily PTing here since I gets no love from the study group thread. Seriously, everyone there is just doing his/her own thing and the only lively stuff come from the mega posters who were primarily October takers. I miss the October thread.
-
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:50 am
Re: December 2013 Retakers
.
Last edited by dosto on Sun Sep 20, 2015 2:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1957
- Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2013 4:16 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
Sounds like a plan. Just don't dump PT results in here alone. We'll have more to discuss if you bring questions and thoughts from the PT.retaking23 wrote:I'm just about to start posting my daily PTing here since I gets no love from the study group thread. Seriously, everyone there is just doing his/her own thing and the only lively stuff come from the mega posters who were primarily October takers. I miss the October thread.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1846
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 2:11 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
.
Last edited by 062914123 on Thu Jul 03, 2014 2:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:04 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
Have any of you guys read through Superprep and found it useful?
I'm trying to figure out if it would be worth my time to take A,B, and C so late in the game (especially since I have a handful of newer tests to PT with).
I'm trying to figure out if it would be worth my time to take A,B, and C so late in the game (especially since I have a handful of newer tests to PT with).
- drawstring
- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
I found Super Prep useful, but if you're limited for time I think you should focus on newer material. In fact, I think people should focus on newer material from the start of their studies, as it gives them more time for reviewing and practicing the type of questions they'll likely face on the real thing.blackbirdfly wrote:Have any of you guys read through Superprep and found it useful?
I'm trying to figure out if it would be worth my time to take A,B, and C so late in the game (especially since I have a handful of newer tests to PT with).
-
- Posts: 1846
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 2:11 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
.
Last edited by 062914123 on Thu Jul 03, 2014 2:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:50 am
Re: December 2013 Retakers
.
Last edited by dosto on Sun Sep 20, 2015 2:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1846
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 2:11 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
.
Last edited by 062914123 on Thu Jul 03, 2014 2:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:04 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
drawstring wrote:I found Super Prep useful, but if you're limited for time I think you should focus on newer material. In fact, I think people should focus on newer material from the start of their studies, as it gives them more time for reviewing and practicing the type of questions they'll likely face on the real thing.blackbirdfly wrote:Have any of you guys read through Superprep and found it useful?
I'm trying to figure out if it would be worth my time to take A,B, and C so late in the game (especially since I have a handful of newer tests to PT with).
Thanks for the advice! I will leave it on the bookshelf for now.
- yomisterd
- Posts: 1571
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 12:52 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
Does this imply I should apply to schools I know I could get into with current scores? Apply everywhere now? Or hold?Otunga wrote:I'd probably apply to Cornell and BU/BC with my current score if I could. The issue is that, from what I've read on this board, the schools can see you're retaking by looking at your LSAC profile, so they just keep your app on hold until the new score comes in. (this is assuming you submit it before the test)goldenboy514 wrote:Are u applying with current score or are you holding application all together. Unfortunately my LSAt was such a bomb that I wouldnt be applying to law school at all with my current score , but seems ur in a better spotOtunga wrote:As it stands, I'm basically looking at Penn with little money, UVA and Duke with decent-ish money and Cornell with better than decent-ish money (80-100k) according to myLSN. If all those dropped like 10K or whatever...so be it, I suppose.
Of course, we all shall improve our scores and this becomes moot.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- bbkk
- Posts: 728
- Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:28 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
blackbirdfly wrote:Have any of you guys read through Superprep and found it useful?
I'm trying to figure out if it would be worth my time to take A,B, and C so late in the game (especially since I have a handful of newer tests to PT with).
Just did SuperPrep C tonight. Last time seen it was over a year ago ( though I took the RC as an exp with another PT a few months). I have to say it has a lot weird questions. I think for you maybe it's better to finish your newer PTs first and review thoroughly, and then come back to A B C when you have extra time. Though, one good thing about Superprep is that all 3 PTs come with detailed OFFICIAL explanations. You can get a good idea about how the testmakers approach the questions.
Btw, Game 1 is a curve ball - not too difficult but I had to pause for a min to think about set up( I watched 7sage afterwards, but I did it differently. Anybody else has done this game and have a different set up?)
Last edited by bbkk on Fri Nov 01, 2013 12:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
- bbkk
- Posts: 728
- Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:28 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
Btw my sleeping pattern was messed up lately..since the score release date 

- 05062014
- Posts: 432
- Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 11:05 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
i went -0 on the Oct LSAT and I bombed 2/3 of the superprep LG sections... if you do attempt them and fail, i hope my words give you some comfort. cheersbbkk wrote:blackbirdfly wrote:Have any of you guys read through Superprep and found it useful?
I'm trying to figure out if it would be worth my time to take A,B, and C so late in the game (especially since I have a handful of newer tests to PT with).
Just did SuperPrep C tonight. Last time seen it was over a year ago ( though I took the RC as an exp with another PT a few months). I have to say it has a lot weird questions. I think for you maybe it's better to finish your newer PTs first and review thoroughly, and then come back to A B C when you have extra time. Though, one good thing about Superprep is that all 3 PTs come with detailed OFFICIAL explanations. You can get a good idea about how the testmakers approach the questions.
Btw, Game 1 is a curve ball - not too difficult but I had to pause for a min to think about set up( I watched 7sage afterwards, but I did it differently. Anybody else has done this game and have a different set up?)
- retaking23
- Posts: 452
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 10:34 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
I'm gonna jump the gun just a bit. On Mylsn, what LSAT score should we use if we have more than one? The highest? The most recent? Average of all the scores?
And, while we're on this topic, what is the general consensus about multiple LSATs at T14 schools. I know they only report the highest LSATs of the student body for USNews but suppose I have three scores: 160, 165, and 170. Will I fare better than someone with only a 165? I'd like to think so. How about someone with only a 166 or 167 or 168 or 169? Surely someone with just a 170 or higher trumps me, no?
And, while we're on this topic, what is the general consensus about multiple LSATs at T14 schools. I know they only report the highest LSATs of the student body for USNews but suppose I have three scores: 160, 165, and 170. Will I fare better than someone with only a 165? I'd like to think so. How about someone with only a 166 or 167 or 168 or 169? Surely someone with just a 170 or higher trumps me, no?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1846
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 2:11 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
.
Last edited by 062914123 on Thu Jul 03, 2014 2:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Dr.Zer0
- Posts: 1027
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:11 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
You guys, I'm struggling with NA questions did 20 of the level 4 ones in cambridge packet and went -11 WTF! Anyways, do you guys have any tips on how to tackle NA questions or should I just go back and review the appropriate MLSAT/LSAT Trainer chapters?
- action90
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2012 12:25 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
Where is that happening?PourMeTea wrote:9ish EST I believe.goldenboy514 wrote:
Id definitely be in. What time? Work till 4 :/
Shitty part-time (work me fulltime) job that has me working Sunday
- action90
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2012 12:25 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
Finally getting trainer tomorrow. Had to call amazon 3 times thoughPourMeTea wrote:Got my new copy of the Trainer and gonna truck through my favorite chapters, then PT 57 tomorrowdosto5 wrote:PT57 and maybe even some Trainer after that. Living the life.snagglepuss wrote:. Any one else celebrating Halloween with hours of LSAT prep?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- action90
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2012 12:25 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
Have you tried the negation trick?Dr.Zer0 wrote:You guys, I'm struggling with NA questions did 20 of the level 4 ones in cambridge packet and went -11 WTF! Anyways, do you guys have any tips on how to tackle NA questions or should I just go back and review the appropriate MLSAT/LSAT Trainer chapters?
- PrizeFighter
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2013 12:57 am
Re: December 2013 Retakers
bee wrote:ME.goldenboy514 wrote:Idk if it was jitters or freaking out because I did it fine after reviewing, but I totally bombed the movies game on 70 and made some sick and distorted diagram that Ive never made before. Pretty much did 3 categories on the bottom for each screen and split the 1st and 3rd in half with a 7 and 9 time on each. Helped me make 0 inferences. In hindsight it was pretty easy, but did anyone else mess up diagramming this?
I LAID IT OUT LIKE A LINEAR GAME FML FML FML. i missed all but 1 q on theaters. that one game DESTROYED my score.
I know I'm late on this, but when theaters threw me for a loop as far as not being sure how to set it up, I looked at how all the elements were laid out in the first question and copied it. Usually works when I am unsure about the best approach.
-
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:50 am
Re: December 2013 Retakers
.
Last edited by dosto on Sun Sep 20, 2015 2:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1846
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 2:11 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
.
Last edited by 062914123 on Thu Jul 03, 2014 2:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login