The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread (GREY DEY 7/1) Forum

TheWalkingDebt · Post by **TheWalkingDebt** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 5:46 pm

benwyatt wrote:
basedvulpes wrote:I keep seeing everyone's tars and remembering all the great times we've had together
Me too.

I'll see you all in the C/O and Applicant threads

or maybe the October thread.

*knock on wood*
*salt over the shoulder*

basedvulpes · Post by **basedvulpes** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 5:47 pm

Post removed.

abcde12341 · Post by **abcde12341** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 5:47 pm

AbbeyS wrote:
BirdLawExpert wrote:
abcde12341 wrote:LOL i posted alot right after the LSAT , yes now a lurker
You have 12 posts.
BlAsTeDdDdDd

LOL ... truuu . well we all gotta start somewhere

GreekOmega12 · Post by **GreekOmega12** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 5:47 pm

What does the first person to confirm grey get?

Op_Diom · Post by **Op_Diom** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 5:47 pm

I'd say -11. However, now beginning to think it might be -10. RC and LR were nothing special, while the hardest game on LG didn't have many questions at all. Thus, leaning towards -10 the more I think about it.

jumbo2016 · Post by **jumbo2016** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 5:48 pm

abcde12341 wrote:
pace03 wrote:
drtamale wrote:What do you all mean by green and grey ???
You're kinda hilarious actually, gotta admit

i wanna know too lol drtamale

Professor Crunchwrap Supreme can't you just ask your super secret LSAT friends?

Oskosh · Post by **Oskosh** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 5:48 pm

benwyatt wrote:
TheWalkingDebt wrote:If it's -8 there goes my shot at 174-175 in all likelihood.
-8 seems ludicrous

-8 has happened before, though. ON A JUNE TEST

BirdLawExpert · Post by **BirdLawExpert** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 5:48 pm

Post removed.

jumbo2016 · Post by **jumbo2016** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 5:48 pm

GreekOmega12 wrote:What does the first person to confirm grey get?

Full ride to Yale. Read their fine print

AbbeyS · Post by **AbbeyS** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 5:48 pm

benwyatt wrote:
basedvulpes wrote:I keep seeing everyone's tars and remembering all the great times we've had together
Me too.

I'll see you all in the C/O and Applicant threads

Noo lets all stay hereee

justabitunusual · Post by **justabitunusual** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 5:48 pm

Good Luck Waiters

ms9 · Post by **ms9** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 5:48 pm

AbbeyS wrote:
MikeSpivey wrote:I think the email out to licensees was worded slightly differently than in the past, so there is a natural inclination to be reserved with predictions. But the email did go out and I am rather confident scores will follow shortly.

In less optimistic news, I'm a bit worried about the curve on this one.
WHY

The experts now have the test and the test looks very easy to people who have seen it for like 25 straight years, or so I am hearing. It will be higher than -8 for sure.

TexasENG · Post by **TexasENG** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 5:48 pm

Ugh.. Please at least a -12. I really don't want to deal with a -8 to -10.

BirdLawExpert · Post by **BirdLawExpert** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 5:49 pm

Post removed.

TheWalkingDebt · Post by **TheWalkingDebt** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 5:49 pm

TexasENG wrote:Ugh.. Please at least a -12. I really don't want to deal with a -8 to -10.

Oskosh · Post by **Oskosh** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 5:49 pm

June 2007, 100Q test, -8 curve.

bpolley0 · Post by **bpolley0** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 5:49 pm

cdotson2 · Post by **cdotson2** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 5:49 pm

jumbo2016 wrote:
GreekOmega12 wrote:What does the first person to confirm grey get?
Full ride to Yale. Read their fine print

you beat me too it!

BirdLawExpert · Post by **BirdLawExpert** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 5:49 pm

Post removed.

candidlatke · Post by **candidlatke** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 5:49 pm

THANKS OBAMA

Oskosh · Post by **Oskosh** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 5:50 pm

MikeSpivey wrote:
AbbeyS wrote:
MikeSpivey wrote:I think the email out to licensees was worded slightly differently than in the past, so there is a natural inclination to be reserved with predictions. But the email did go out and I am rather confident scores will follow shortly.

In less optimistic news, I'm a bit worried about the curve on this one.
WHY
The experts now have the test and the test looks very easy to people who have seen it for like 25 straight years, or so I am hearing. It will be higher than -8 for sure.

Ask them about the last game lol. Were the games an overreaction?

urbanist11 · Post by **urbanist11** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 5:50 pm

Post removed.

basedvulpes · Post by **basedvulpes** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 5:50 pm

Post removed.

placeholder · Post by **placeholder** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 5:50 pm

MikeSpivey wrote:
AbbeyS wrote:
MikeSpivey wrote:I think the email out to licensees was worded slightly differently than in the past, so there is a natural inclination to be reserved with predictions. But the email did go out and I am rather confident scores will follow shortly.

In less optimistic news, I'm a bit worried about the curve on this one.
WHY
The experts now have the test and the test looks very easy to people who have seen it for like 25 straight years, or so I am hearing. It will be higher than -8 for sure.

yeah im pretty sure once people get to look at the last LG game itll become clear it wasnt hard just not worded in the usual way.

Oskosh · Post by **Oskosh** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 5:50 pm

bpolley0 wrote:
Oskosh wrote:
bpolley0 wrote:
Oskosh wrote:
MikeSpivey wrote:I think the email out to licensees was worded slightly differently than in the past, so there is a natural inclination to be reserved with predictions. But the email did go out and I am rather confident scores will follow shortly.

In less optimistic news, I'm a bit worried about the curve on this one.
So why are you less optimistic? Are you allowed to tell us? Shit, damn curve. -11 please!!!
-11 is perfectly reasonable. Hoping for -12.
I just don't want it to be something stupid like -8.
+1

I don't think it will. Decembers curve was -12 and I personally thought that test was slightly easier. If only how I felt determined the curve.

-12 I'm cool with. I just became dispirited by spivey's post, and immediately thought of that awful -8 curve.