The Official February 2015 Study Group Forum

Dr. Nefario · Post by **Dr. Nefario** » Thu Feb 05, 2015 12:37 pm

Shakawkaw wrote:I am a fan of evil bunny.

Rigo · Post by **Rigo** » Thu Feb 05, 2015 12:37 pm

gamerish · Post by **gamerish** » Thu Feb 05, 2015 12:39 pm

Post removed...

PeanutsNJam · Post by **PeanutsNJam** » Thu Feb 05, 2015 12:41 pm

If you want to know who YP's, search 3.5-4.33 and 170-180 on mylsn.info

All the schools with a bunch of waitlists/rejections are YP.

Michigan, UVA, and Penn as shown below. Chicago trying to play it like they're HYS but they're not.

Put in "lower T-14" numbers, such as 3.0-3.6/165-170, and you'll see a few schools stick out with way more waitlists than their peer schools.

GWU, Notre Dame, U of Washington, BU, BC, W&M, and Fordham are your YP schools ranked 14-50. American YP hardcore too, but they're TT.

But a person above both medians or above both 75% being rejected is not YP. They have some other problem with their application.

gamerish · Post by **gamerish** » Thu Feb 05, 2015 12:46 pm

Post removed...

Shakawkaw · Post by **Shakawkaw** » Thu Feb 05, 2015 12:47 pm

So, tl;dr: I shouldn't score above the 75th?

Rigo · Post by **Rigo** » Thu Feb 05, 2015 12:47 pm

Rigo · Post by **Rigo** » Thu Feb 05, 2015 12:48 pm

PeanutsNJam · Post by **PeanutsNJam** » Thu Feb 05, 2015 12:53 pm

gamerish wrote:People with dual 75ths+ definitely get YPed.

People who are rejected are not being YP'd. Look at the YP schools. They ain't rejecting anybody. If you're dual 75th+ and you got rejected, it's cause they hate you. They're not YPing.

Rigo · Post by **Rigo** » Thu Feb 05, 2015 12:54 pm

Dr. Nefario · Post by **Dr. Nefario** » Thu Feb 05, 2015 12:59 pm

This is such fun off day conversation

Smallville · Post by **Smallville** » Thu Feb 05, 2015 1:00 pm

well I refreshed and was all bleh bc so many posts to catch up on... but was entertaining

No worries Mr. Ben, I like your tude... you'll get the hang of this place, dont let Rigo scare ya, hes a chump(who spends a lot of time looking at #s and shiz) y'all can be a power team

Shakawkaw · Post by **Shakawkaw** » Thu Feb 05, 2015 1:01 pm

Smallville wrote:well I refreshed and was all bleh bc so many posts to catch up on... but was entertaining No worries Mr. Ben, I like your tude... you'll get the hang of this place, dont let Rigo scare ya, hes a chump(who spends a lot of time looking at #s and shiz) y'all can be a power team

So, Rigo and GT are the HLS power couple. Don't get it twisted.

santoki · Post by **santoki** » Thu Feb 05, 2015 1:03 pm

Post removed.

Shakawkaw · Post by **Shakawkaw** » Thu Feb 05, 2015 1:05 pm

santoki wrote:why cant we practice polygamy

Rough patch with the SO?

sfoglia · Post by **sfoglia** » Thu Feb 05, 2015 1:05 pm

I am warm in bed. Fuck PT 74. Over the LSAT.

PeanutsNJam · Post by **PeanutsNJam** » Thu Feb 05, 2015 1:11 pm

sfoglia wrote:I am warm in bed. Fuck PT 74. Over the LSAT.

Just don't even take it. Fight the system. Don't apply to law school, but sneak into all the classes anyway.

Rigo · Post by **Rigo** » Thu Feb 05, 2015 1:13 pm

Dr. Nefario · Post by **Dr. Nefario** » Thu Feb 05, 2015 1:14 pm

Atta girl Sfogs. #freeday

ETA: I really just want someone to look at my offers and grade how bad/meh they are at this point or what to negotiate with who and how much at a given school should I get before attending without making a thread about it. But all my offers gon change when I 170 Saturday.

sfoglia · Post by **sfoglia** » Thu Feb 05, 2015 1:14 pm

PeanutsNJam wrote:
sfoglia wrote:I am warm in bed. Fuck PT 74. Over the LSAT.
Just don't even take it. Fight the system. Don't apply to law school, but sneak into all the classes anyway.

This is a great idea.

Dirigo wrote: Or just pull a Mike Ross.

I want to do him, not be him.

GUYS, haven't taken a single PT before 1pm since June. If I fail on Saturday, we will know why.

(And then I can expect a 180 in June because AFTERNOON TEST.)

PeanutsNJam · Post by **PeanutsNJam** » Thu Feb 05, 2015 1:15 pm

sfoglia wrote:
Dirigo wrote: Or just pull a Mike Ross.
I want to do him, not be him.

Are you also #teamRoss?

Do you also think Ross > Specter?

msp8 · Post by **msp8** » Thu Feb 05, 2015 1:18 pm

oh btw sfogs and leslie, i tried your suggestion of underlining in LR yesterday. worked really well, so thanks!

Dr. Nefario · Post by **Dr. Nefario** » Thu Feb 05, 2015 1:19 pm

PeanutsNJam wrote:#teamRossRick Ross

RaiderRed wrote:Amirite?

ilikebaseball · Post by **ilikebaseball** » Thu Feb 05, 2015 1:21 pm

msp8 wrote:oh btw sfogs and leslie, i tried your suggestion of underlining in LR yesterday. worked really well, so thanks!

this works SO well. I seriously got better in LR just by separating premise and conclusions. Every premise I'd separate it by drawing straight dark lines ( |.......| ) and every conclusion I separate it with "(...)". It makes you understand the argument SO much better. You take it in segments, instead of the whole thing at once.

sfoglia · Post by **sfoglia** » Thu Feb 05, 2015 1:25 pm

PeanutsNJam wrote:
sfoglia wrote:
Dirigo wrote: Or just pull a Mike Ross.
I want to do him, not be him.
Are you also #teamRoss?

Do you also think Ross > Specter?

No, but I'd definitely have sex with him, anyway.

Harvey can be an asshole, but Mike is just downright dumb as fuck sometimes.

Also would do Rachel's ex-lover, the one she kissed. Also Rachel. Maybe Donna, too.