It reminds me of PP's method (I've said that so much, I'm sorry for sounding like a broken record) but I find 10 shots to be too much, like you'll remember #5 is C so you didn't really get the mechanics. I think 3-4 times is idea for getting it and if it is a bitch game, print it out 2 times to review later in the studying.greatspirit wrote:Thoughts on 7sage's "foolproof" LG review method? I just did a logic game I went 5/6 on...and I feel it may be tedious for me to try the whole thing over again.
The Official June 2017 Study Group Forum
-
- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
At the gym today I cycled post-lift and burnt 180 cals on the dot. Didnt realize until i was done... #180lifestyle
-
- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
jagerbom79 wrote:At the gym today I cycled post-lift and burnt 180 cals on the dot. Didnt realize until i was done... #180lifestyle

- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Lmfao gotta shred down...sometimes cardio happens brodj9i27 wrote:jagerbom79 wrote:At the gym today I cycled post-lift and burnt 180 cals on the dot. Didnt realize until i was done... #180lifestyle
-
- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Was going to muscle through the Trainer and finish it today, decided not to since I would have just flaked through the last 5 or so chapters. Being said, I went back and did the alleged "4 really hard LG questions" and missed 2.... those are not the stupid new games so at least I still have some of my LG prowess. Opening the big folder titled, "BASIC/ADVANCED LINEAR" next week, along with PT 7-20 for dat dere RC and LR; the wheels are finally turning again.
Jager, you are wrong. Cardio is the devil and shall not be a tool ever, just bench/squat/deadlift for 20 or so reps and 4 sets. there, cardio. Might just start baby bulking again, I want to DL 500....
Jager, you are wrong. Cardio is the devil and shall not be a tool ever, just bench/squat/deadlift for 20 or so reps and 4 sets. there, cardio. Might just start baby bulking again, I want to DL 500....
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Haha fair enough... And, Nice progress on the trainer. I'm going to pick back up to speed tomorrow morning and finish it by the end of this week. moving back into my apt and starting school again slowed things down, but I'll get back on track.dj9i27 wrote:Was going to muscle through the Trainer and finish it today, decided not to since I would have just flaked through the last 5 or so chapters. Being said, I went back and did the alleged "4 really hard LG questions" and missed 2.... those are not the stupid new games so at least I still have some of my LG prowess. Opening the big folder titled, "BASIC/ADVANCED LINEAR" next week, along with PT 7-20 for dat dere RC and LR; the wheels are finally turning again.
Jager, you are wrong. Cardio is the devil and shall not be a tool ever, just bench/squat/deadlift for 20 or so reps and 4 sets. there, cardio. Might just start baby bulking again, I want to DL 500....
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2017 6:07 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
I did not realize how absolutely insane debt slavery paying law school sticker prices were until I did the repayment plans for a theoretical case over time. Jesus Christ.
-
- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
I just moved too, sleeping on an air mattress and using clothes out of a banana box until Thursday :/jagerbom79 wrote:Haha fair enough... And, Nice progress on the trainer. I'm going to pick back up to speed tomorrow morning and finish it by the end of this week. moving back into my apt and starting school again slowed things down, but I'll get back on track.dj9i27 wrote:Was going to muscle through the Trainer and finish it today, decided not to since I would have just flaked through the last 5 or so chapters. Being said, I went back and did the alleged "4 really hard LG questions" and missed 2.... those are not the stupid new games so at least I still have some of my LG prowess. Opening the big folder titled, "BASIC/ADVANCED LINEAR" next week, along with PT 7-20 for dat dere RC and LR; the wheels are finally turning again.
Jager, you are wrong. Cardio is the devil and shall not be a tool ever, just bench/squat/deadlift for 20 or so reps and 4 sets. there, cardio. Might just start baby bulking again, I want to DL 500....
At least I didn't forget the Trainer; I personally don't mind until waiting until the official 4 month date.
-
- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
http://www.law.virginia.edu/html/academics/awards.htmAaronRodgers wrote:I did not realize how absolutely insanedebt slaverypaying law school sticker prices were until I did the repayment plans for a theoretical case over time. Jesus Christ.
After reading this, please LSAC Gods grant me with a 177+ so that may b i cen haz dillard.
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2017 6:07 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
I could possibly get into Harvard, and when I first found that out I was like - Dayum!dj9i27 wrote:http://www.law.virginia.edu/html/academics/awards.htmAaronRodgers wrote:I did not realize how absolutely insanedebt slaverypaying law school sticker prices were until I did the repayment plans for a theoretical case over time. Jesus Christ.
After reading this, please LSAC Gods grant me with a 177+ so that may b i cen haz dillard.
Then I realized, they don't give out scholarships. At least, worst case scenario, I'm looking at WUSTL at near full scholly. Well, actual worst case scenario is not going to law school, but w/e
-
- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Yeahhh, Harvard isn't happening for me; the bet that I will tattoo my LSAT score on me barring an acceptance still stands. Being said if you have HYS stats, you're more than eligible for a T14 full ride, dude.AaronRodgers wrote:I could possibly get into Harvard, and when I first found that out I was like - Dayum!dj9i27 wrote:http://www.law.virginia.edu/html/academics/awards.htmAaronRodgers wrote:I did not realize how absolutely insanedebt slaverypaying law school sticker prices were until I did the repayment plans for a theoretical case over time. Jesus Christ.
After reading this, please LSAC Gods grant me with a 177+ so that may b i cen haz dillard.
Then I realized, they don't give out scholarships. At least, worst case scenario, I'm looking at WUSTL at near full scholly. Well, actual worst case scenario is not going to law school, but w/e
These people are my goals (I'd like more $$$ tho, even if it is 5g)
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/CalSplitter13
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Dxgriffin
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2017 6:07 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
I would slide in at sticker, my GPA really isn't that high at all.dj9i27 wrote:Yeahhh, Harvard isn't happening for me; the bet that I will tattoo my LSAT score on me barring an acceptance still stands. Being said if you have HYS stats, you're more than eligible for a T14 full ride, dude.AaronRodgers wrote:I could possibly get into Harvard, and when I first found that out I was like - Dayum!dj9i27 wrote:http://www.law.virginia.edu/html/academics/awards.htmAaronRodgers wrote:I did not realize how absolutely insanedebt slaverypaying law school sticker prices were until I did the repayment plans for a theoretical case over time. Jesus Christ.
After reading this, please LSAC Gods grant me with a 177+ so that may b i cen haz dillard.
Then I realized, they don't give out scholarships. At least, worst case scenario, I'm looking at WUSTL at near full scholly. Well, actual worst case scenario is not going to law school, but w/e
These people are my goals (I'd like more $$$ tho, even if it is 5g)
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/CalSplitter13
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Dxgriffin
I don't think I will get a full ride, but I do hope for one at a lower T-14. Still, those examples you gave a pretty dang good.
- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
I haven't looked yet at calculating my LSDAS GPA, but I didn't think it was substantially different, but for example "CalSplitter13"s was. Why might that be?dj9i27 wrote:Yeahhh, Harvard isn't happening for me; the bet that I will tattoo my LSAT score on me barring an acceptance still stands. Being said if you have HYS stats, you're more than eligible for a T14 full ride, dude.AaronRodgers wrote:I could possibly get into Harvard, and when I first found that out I was like - Dayum!dj9i27 wrote:http://www.law.virginia.edu/html/academics/awards.htmAaronRodgers wrote:I did not realize how absolutely insanedebt slaverypaying law school sticker prices were until I did the repayment plans for a theoretical case over time. Jesus Christ.
After reading this, please LSAC Gods grant me with a 177+ so that may b i cen haz dillard.
Then I realized, they don't give out scholarships. At least, worst case scenario, I'm looking at WUSTL at near full scholly. Well, actual worst case scenario is not going to law school, but w/e
These people are my goals (I'd like more $$$ tho, even if it is 5g)
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/CalSplitter13
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Dxgriffin
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2017 6:07 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
A lot of schools calculate GPA in a way that, say, you retake a class you got a D or F in and those don't count anymore, but for LSAC it does. Some schools weight classes weird too.jagerbom79 wrote:I haven't looked yet at calculating my LSDAS GPA, but I didn't think it was substantially different, but for example "CalSplitter13"s was. Why might that be?dj9i27 wrote:Yeahhh, Harvard isn't happening for me; the bet that I will tattoo my LSAT score on me barring an acceptance still stands. Being said if you have HYS stats, you're more than eligible for a T14 full ride, dude.AaronRodgers wrote:I could possibly get into Harvard, and when I first found that out I was like - Dayum!dj9i27 wrote:http://www.law.virginia.edu/html/academics/awards.htmAaronRodgers wrote:I did not realize how absolutely insanedebt slaverypaying law school sticker prices were until I did the repayment plans for a theoretical case over time. Jesus Christ.
After reading this, please LSAC Gods grant me with a 177+ so that may b i cen haz dillard.
Then I realized, they don't give out scholarships. At least, worst case scenario, I'm looking at WUSTL at near full scholly. Well, actual worst case scenario is not going to law school, but w/e
These people are my goals (I'd like more $$$ tho, even if it is 5g)
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/CalSplitter13
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Dxgriffin
-
- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
possibility of grade inflation at his U (i.e. B+=3.5 instead of 3.33) or maybe he fucked around in HS dual enrollment classes and his U GPA is strictly Fresh-Sr.?jagerbom79 wrote:I haven't looked yet at calculating my LSDAS GPA, but I didn't think it was substantially different, but for example "CalSplitter13"s was. Why might that be?dj9i27 wrote:Yeahhh, Harvard isn't happening for me; the bet that I will tattoo my LSAT score on me barring an acceptance still stands. Being said if you have HYS stats, you're more than eligible for a T14 full ride, dude.AaronRodgers wrote:I could possibly get into Harvard, and when I first found that out I was like - Dayum!dj9i27 wrote:http://www.law.virginia.edu/html/academics/awards.htmAaronRodgers wrote:I did not realize how absolutely insanedebt slaverypaying law school sticker prices were until I did the repayment plans for a theoretical case over time. Jesus Christ.
After reading this, please LSAC Gods grant me with a 177+ so that may b i cen haz dillard.
Then I realized, they don't give out scholarships. At least, worst case scenario, I'm looking at WUSTL at near full scholly. Well, actual worst case scenario is not going to law school, but w/e
These people are my goals (I'd like more $$$ tho, even if it is 5g)
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/CalSplitter13
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Dxgriffin
-
- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
i mean my gpa is pretty bad (slightly higher than the ones I listed) which leads me to believe I can pull 3/4+ with a high lsat and good negotiations (plus a lot of luck).AaronRodgers wrote: I would slide in at sticker, my GPA really isn't that high at all.
I don't think I will get a full ride, but I do hope for one at a lower T-14. Still, those examples you gave a pretty dang good.
- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Ahh okay, mine should be pretty spot on to what my graduating GPA will be then. B+ for me was a 3.25 .... and I crushed HS Dual enrollment so that should help me actually somedj9i27 wrote:possibility of grade inflation at his U (i.e. B+=3.5 instead of 3.33) or maybe he fucked around in HS dual enrollment classes and his U GPA is strictly Fresh-Sr.?jagerbom79 wrote:I haven't looked yet at calculating my LSDAS GPA, but I didn't think it was substantially different, but for example "CalSplitter13"s was. Why might that be?dj9i27 wrote:Yeahhh, Harvard isn't happening for me; the bet that I will tattoo my LSAT score on me barring an acceptance still stands. Being said if you have HYS stats, you're more than eligible for a T14 full ride, dude.AaronRodgers wrote:I could possibly get into Harvard, and when I first found that out I was like - Dayum!dj9i27 wrote:http://www.law.virginia.edu/html/academics/awards.htmAaronRodgers wrote:I did not realize how absolutely insanedebt slaverypaying law school sticker prices were until I did the repayment plans for a theoretical case over time. Jesus Christ.
After reading this, please LSAC Gods grant me with a 177+ so that may b i cen haz dillard.
Then I realized, they don't give out scholarships. At least, worst case scenario, I'm looking at WUSTL at near full scholly. Well, actual worst case scenario is not going to law school, but w/e
These people are my goals (I'd like more $$$ tho, even if it is 5g)
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/CalSplitter13
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Dxgriffin
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Ya definitely. I dont think its truly THAT rigid and luck/opportunity is a lot of it.dj9i27 wrote:i mean my gpa is pretty bad (slightly higher than the ones I listed) which leads me to believe I can pull 3/4+ with a high lsat and good negotiations (plus a lot of luck).AaronRodgers wrote: I would slide in at sticker, my GPA really isn't that high at all.
I don't think I will get a full ride, but I do hope for one at a lower T-14. Still, those examples you gave a pretty dang good.
-
- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Your lsac gpa is going to be higher than your u gpa then lol. *envy boilsjagerbom79 wrote:Ya definitely. I dont think its truly THAT rigid and luck/opportunity is a lot of it.dj9i27 wrote:i mean my gpa is pretty bad (slightly higher than the ones I listed) which leads me to believe I can pull 3/4+ with a high lsat and good negotiations (plus a lot of luck).AaronRodgers wrote: I would slide in at sticker, my GPA really isn't that high at all.
I don't think I will get a full ride, but I do hope for one at a lower T-14. Still, those examples you gave a pretty dang good.
I have a lot of softs in my corner, so hopefully that'll pull through. not to mention fucking orgo ii and physics are what murked my gpa so if it is bought up I can be like, "um yeah I was dumb neuroscience :/"
- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
*rubs hands * that should be good. Haha yeah I was Accounting & Finance and didn't finish but nearly also Applied Math minor so from Accounting and AM i def have some tough classes too that fucked medj9i27 wrote:Your lsac gpa is going to be higher than your u gpa then lol. *envy boilsjagerbom79 wrote:Ya definitely. I dont think its truly THAT rigid and luck/opportunity is a lot of it.dj9i27 wrote:i mean my gpa is pretty bad (slightly higher than the ones I listed) which leads me to believe I can pull 3/4+ with a high lsat and good negotiations (plus a lot of luck).AaronRodgers wrote: I would slide in at sticker, my GPA really isn't that high at all.
I don't think I will get a full ride, but I do hope for one at a lower T-14. Still, those examples you gave a pretty dang good.
I have a lot of softs in my corner, so hopefully that'll pull through. not to mention fucking orgo ii and physics are what murked my gpa so if it is bought up I can be like, "um yeah I was dumb neuroscience :/"
-
- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
shot in the dark, financial accounting and business calc?jagerbom79 wrote:*rubs hands * that should be good. Haha yeah I was Accounting & Finance and didn't finish but nearly also Applied Math minor so from Accounting and AM i def have some tough classes too that fucked medj9i27 wrote:Your lsac gpa is going to be higher than your u gpa then lol. *envy boilsjagerbom79 wrote:Ya definitely. I dont think its truly THAT rigid and luck/opportunity is a lot of it.dj9i27 wrote:i mean my gpa is pretty bad (slightly higher than the ones I listed) which leads me to believe I can pull 3/4+ with a high lsat and good negotiations (plus a lot of luck).AaronRodgers wrote: I would slide in at sticker, my GPA really isn't that high at all.
I don't think I will get a full ride, but I do hope for one at a lower T-14. Still, those examples you gave a pretty dang good.
I have a lot of softs in my corner, so hopefully that'll pull through. not to mention fucking orgo ii and physics are what murked my gpa so if it is bought up I can be like, "um yeah I was dumb neuroscience :/"
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Well not intro to Fin Acc but an upper level FAR and Tax class, and then on the math side Calc 2dj9i27 wrote:shot in the dark, financial accounting and business calc?jagerbom79 wrote:*rubs hands * that should be good. Haha yeah I was Accounting & Finance and didn't finish but nearly also Applied Math minor so from Accounting and AM i def have some tough classes too that fucked medj9i27 wrote:Your lsac gpa is going to be higher than your u gpa then lol. *envy boilsjagerbom79 wrote:Ya definitely. I dont think its truly THAT rigid and luck/opportunity is a lot of it.dj9i27 wrote:i mean my gpa is pretty bad (slightly higher than the ones I listed) which leads me to believe I can pull 3/4+ with a high lsat and good negotiations (plus a lot of luck).AaronRodgers wrote: I would slide in at sticker, my GPA really isn't that high at all.
I don't think I will get a full ride, but I do hope for one at a lower T-14. Still, those examples you gave a pretty dang good.
I have a lot of softs in my corner, so hopefully that'll pull through. not to mention fucking orgo ii and physics are what murked my gpa so if it is bought up I can be like, "um yeah I was dumb neuroscience :/"
-
- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
damn they made you take 2? for accounting? wtf I went up to 3 which was a bad move because I got a C (I was burnt out on stem, took 18 credits of that shit in one semester).jagerbom79 wrote: Well not intro to Fin Acc but an upper level FAR and Tax class, and then on the math side Calc 2
I miss UG tho. bouncing majors, not knowing what was next; everything was just, chaos and fun. now it is too structured, I wish I could have it back but doubt I ever will.
- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Hahaha well said! I knew what I wanted to do, but everything really was just fun and chaosdj9i27 wrote:damn they made you take 2? for accounting? wtf I went up to 3 which was a bad move because I got a C (I was burnt out on stem, took 18 credits of that shit in one semester).jagerbom79 wrote: Well not intro to Fin Acc but an upper level FAR and Tax class, and then on the math side Calc 2
I miss UG tho. bouncing majors, not knowing what was next; everything was just, chaos and fun. now it is too structured, I wish I could have it back but doubt I ever will.
No for Accounting at my school, it was just business calc that you had to do. I wnted to make myself more competitive so i was thinking about adding Applied math as a minor. I thought i was badass enough to handle my true first really hard semester of college by taking upper level maths and accounting at the same time. Truly, finance wasn't nearly as difficult.a joke comparatively. I didnt finish the Applied Math minor because my schedule would have just been too ridiculous to get all 3 subjects in on time for graduation. And then of course still later on in school, I had some 1-off bad professors or shit grades for one reason or another ;( aka I did well, but really banking on TOP GUN LSAT Score
-
- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
i can relate to the thinking you're hardcore enough to take a shit load of hard classes and pull off a 4.0.. did not work for me lol.jagerbom79 wrote:Hahaha well said! I knew what I wanted to do, but everything really was just fun and chaosdj9i27 wrote:damn they made you take 2? for accounting? wtf I went up to 3 which was a bad move because I got a C (I was burnt out on stem, took 18 credits of that shit in one semester).jagerbom79 wrote: Well not intro to Fin Acc but an upper level FAR and Tax class, and then on the math side Calc 2
I miss UG tho. bouncing majors, not knowing what was next; everything was just, chaos and fun. now it is too structured, I wish I could have it back but doubt I ever will.
No for Accounting at my school, it was just business calc that you had to do. I wnted to make myself more competitive so i was thinking about adding Applied math as a minor. I thought i was badass enough to handle my true first really hard semester of college by taking upper level maths and accounting at the same time. Truly, finance wasn't nearly as difficult.a joke comparatively. I didnt finish the Applied Math minor because my schedule would have just been too ridiculous to get all 3 subjects in on time for graduation. And then of course still later on in school, I had some 1-off bad professors or shit grades for one reason or another ;( aka I did well, but really banking on TOP GUN LSAT Score
I feel like the fact that (and I'm presuming here) neither of us have a 3.8+ actually drives us a little more to get that 175+ since it is a ticket to low debt pretty much. oh please medians, drop again for the love of God make a high lsat worth its weight in gold. I saw a 3.9 169 get dillard, I wonder if the inverse is true as well.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login