The Official September 2014 Study Group Forum
- hetookmetoamovie

- Posts: 620
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2014 12:03 am
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
Haven't done PT 72 yet, but that would make a pretty funny neck tattoobound wrote:fuck equipoise
Good luck y'all!
- unodostres

- Posts: 551
- Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2013 1:01 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
If I don't pick a certain letter for 10 q's I assume I missed somethig
- Colonel_funkadunk

- Posts: 3248
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
Movie I did games for 68 last night after you mentioned it. I had same experience, had 18 min left for last game and used every last second of it. That's imo the hardest game I've come across on the lsat. It was also 1am and the first studying Id done all day bc of the private. But regardless it was a really labor intense game. The stained glass and Dino games were nbd comparatively. And in general
- Colonel_funkadunk

- Posts: 3248
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
unodostres wrote:If I don't pick a certain letter for 10 q's I assume I missed somethig
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ErgoSum

- Posts: 427
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 8:35 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
Guize I need reassurance so I can continue posting fake scores. Pls halpErgoSum wrote:Had to push back the test time. Should I still take it today or take it tomorrow morning? Was planning on doing 70 Monday and 71 Wednesday. If I took it tomorrow I could do 70 Tuesday, 71 Thursday, and the actual one on Saturday. What do you all think? WWTLSD (what would tls do)
- unodostres

- Posts: 551
- Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2013 1:01 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
Same really just plugged away. Going to redo that game.Colonel_funkadunk wrote:Movie I did games for 68 last night after you mentioned it. I had same experience, had 18 min left for last game and used every last second of it. That's imo the hardest game I've come across on the lsat. It was also 1am and the first studying Id done all day bc of the private. But regardless it was a really labor intense game. The stained glass and Dino games were nbd comparatively. And in general
- unodostres

- Posts: 551
- Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2013 1:01 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
I'm doing Tuesday Thursday for 71-72, nothig on FridayErgoSum wrote:Guize I need reassurance so I can continue posting fake scores. Pls halpErgoSum wrote:Had to push back the test time. Should I still take it today or take it tomorrow morning? Was planning on doing 70 Monday and 71 Wednesday. If I took it tomorrow I could do 70 Tuesday, 71 Thursday, and the actual one on Saturday. What do you all think? WWTLSD (what would tls do)
Ur fine
- ErgoSum

- Posts: 427
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 8:35 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
Thank you <3unodostres wrote:
I'm doing Tuesday Thursday for 71-72, nothig on Friday
Ur fine
That was a close one
- chimera

- Posts: 133
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:22 am
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
Have you taken PT 71 yet?smccgrey wrote: I got like 3 Ds in a row and it made me very uncomfortable.
-
Hand

- Posts: 3843
- Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
Sup fools. I'm taking 70 today. May or may not come back to report my fake score later.
Bill get your scantron skills down man. I do the same as Fogs; bubble in after every two pages.
Bill get your scantron skills down man. I do the same as Fogs; bubble in after every two pages.
-
Hand

- Posts: 3843
- Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
--ImageRemoved--smccgrey wrote:3 Ds in a row and it made me very uncomfortable
Last edited by Hand on Sat Sep 20, 2014 11:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
- ErgoSum

- Posts: 427
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 8:35 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
I usually do after every page for LR, after every passage for RC, and after every game for LGhereisonehand wrote:Sup fools. I'm taking 70 today. May or may not come back to report my fake score later.
Bill get your scantron skills down man. I do the same as Fogs; bubble in after every two pages.
During my PT yesterday I skipped a section and wasn't paying attention when I was bubbling in, and realised I had to erase all my answers and rebubble mid-section... So sad ;'[
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- chimera

- Posts: 133
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:22 am
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
Yeah this works best for me too. I used to bubble by question but then I realized that I hated itErgoSum wrote:I usually do after every page for LR, after every passage for RC, and after every game for LG
-
Hand

- Posts: 3843
- Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
hmm but then you don't get that satisfaction of 'boom another six to eight questions down' when you bubble your LRchimera wrote:Yeah this works best for me too. I used to bubble by question but then I realized that I hated itErgoSum wrote:I usually do after every page for LR, after every passage for RC, and after every game for LG
- ErgoSum

- Posts: 427
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 8:35 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
I might take a break from LSAT hardcore drilling today and read some Latin. I miss it :'[. I feel like I've lost my touch in everything except for LSAT these past three months T.t
- unodostres

- Posts: 551
- Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2013 1:01 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
I bubble by question.
I'm doomed
I'm doomed
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
Yeezus

- Posts: 499
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2014 6:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
That's what I do. I never got the whole bubbling after ___ questions/pages. I never have problems with timing bc of it. It's also nice because filling out a bubble acts like a short break for me and lets me mentally reset for the next question.unodostres wrote:I bubble by question.
I'm doomed
- bound

- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 4:49 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
Okay. LR 1 on PT 72 - how in the world is the answer B?! If anything, B weakens it to me. If most products would be purchased EVEN WITHOUT the direct mail advertisements, then uhhhhhhh why the hell would they be necessary??
ugh. i hate this damn test. the next week cannot come fast enough.
ugh. i hate this damn test. the next week cannot come fast enough.
- unodostres

- Posts: 551
- Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2013 1:01 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
It's like rhythm to me but yaYeezusPiece wrote:That's what I do. I never got the whole bubbling after ___ questions/pages. I never have problems with timing bc of it. It's also nice because filling out a bubble acts like a short break for me and lets me mentally reset for the next question.unodostres wrote:I bubble by question.
I'm doomed
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
BJS

- Posts: 291
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2014 7:30 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
PT 71- 173
S1 LR1: -2
S2 (PT54 S2 LG):-1
S3 LG: -3
S4 (Superprep C S1 LG): -2
S5 LR2: -3
S6 RC: -2
OUCH! By gross score, definitely the worst PT I've ever had. I can't believe I missed so much throughout, and I'm especially concerned at the LG scores. What a horrific test. Going to get lunch then review the shit out of this thing. The only victory is that the curved score is close to my average and above my minimum target.
ETA: 7Sage sucks at displaying PT analytics.
S1 LR1: -2
S2 (PT54 S2 LG):-1
S3 LG: -3
S4 (Superprep C S1 LG): -2
S5 LR2: -3
S6 RC: -2
OUCH! By gross score, definitely the worst PT I've ever had. I can't believe I missed so much throughout, and I'm especially concerned at the LG scores. What a horrific test. Going to get lunch then review the shit out of this thing. The only victory is that the curved score is close to my average and above my minimum target.
ETA: 7Sage sucks at displaying PT analytics.
Last edited by BJS on Sat Sep 20, 2014 3:52 pm, edited 3 times in total.
-
ilikebaseball

- Posts: 4102
- Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:04 am
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
PT 71
173
LR-1
LG-0
LG(exp)-0
LR-4
RC-5
Tied a PB. LG was reallllly easy on this one. I understood every single RC passage. I felt so confident. Still missed 5. Unreal. Good thing the curve was very generous.
173
LR-1
LG-0
LG(exp)-0
LR-4
RC-5
Tied a PB. LG was reallllly easy on this one. I understood every single RC passage. I felt so confident. Still missed 5. Unreal. Good thing the curve was very generous.
-
ilikebaseball

- Posts: 4102
- Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:04 am
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
holy shit that's weird. Same test same scoreBJS wrote:PT 71- 173
S1 LR1: -2
S2 (PT54 S2 LG):-1
S3 LG: -3
S4 (Superprep C S1 LG): -3
S5 LR2: -3
S6 RC: -2
OUCH! By gross score, definitely the worst PT I've ever had. I can't believe I missed so much throughout, and I'm especially concerned at the LG scores. What a horrific test. Going to get lunch then review the shit out of this thing. The only victory is that the curved score is close to my average and above my minimum target.
-
Hand

- Posts: 3843
- Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
Q25 I assume? I think that the idea is that that's just the point - these advertisements are not necessary if B is true, and thus the objection to direct mail advertisements, viz., that these are somehow bad for the environment, fails. IT fails because it doesn't even make people buy more shit, so how could they have a detrimental effect on the environment? (The background assumption is that the causal mechanism by way of which they have this detrimental effect is through getting people to buy shit, or otherwise the whole thing makes zero sense.) As the point of the argument is that the objection to direct mail advertisement fails, B strengthens the argument.bound wrote:Okay. LR 1 on PT 72 - how in the world is the answer B?! If anything, B weakens it to me. If most products would be purchased EVEN WITHOUT the direct mail advertisements, then uhhhhhhh why the hell would they be necessary??
ugh. i hate this damn test. the next week cannot come fast enough.
I agree that this is a ridiculous question.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login