eastern time...it's 11:30amTheJanitor6203 wrote:lol, it's not even 8:30 in the morning!mtr12345 wrote:it's not looking like today will be the day
Feb Waiters: is TODAY the DAY? [New Poll] Forum
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:07 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
-
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 4:18 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
They still don't come that early...mtr12345 wrote:eastern time...it's 11:30amTheJanitor6203 wrote:lol, it's not even 8:30 in the morning!mtr12345 wrote:it's not looking like today will be the day
- TheJanitor6203
- Posts: 880
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:12 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
I feel you though. I know that I'm not getting my score today but I can't stop checking my email!
- OliveBC
- Posts: 490
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:41 am
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
TheJanitor6203 wrote:I feel you though. I know that I'm not getting my score today but I can't stop checking my email!
Literally just almost posted this exact same thing! I think we're getting them Monday, but that won't stop me checking neurotically all day

-
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 1:09 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
I've reached the point that I don't want my score for a few more weeks.... Don't want to be disappointed 

Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:47 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
Does the score appear on your account on the website before the email or vice-versa...or is it simultaneous
- OliveBC
- Posts: 490
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:41 am
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
I know exactly how you feel. I've been thinking that for the past few days, but at the same time if it is bad I'd rather know now so I can start prepping for June....bruin91 wrote:I've reached the point that I don't want my score for a few more weeks.... Don't want to be disappointed

-
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 1:09 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
Too negligible of a difference to matter. So practically speaking, simultaneously. Maybe a second or two difference.ws81086n wrote:Does the score appear on your account on the website before the email or vice-versa...or is it simultaneous
-
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 1:09 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
What was your target for Feb again? I'm hoping for a 168.OliveBC wrote:I know exactly how you feel. I've been thinking that for the past few days, but at the same time if it is bad I'd rather know now so I can start prepping for June....bruin91 wrote:I've reached the point that I don't want my score for a few more weeks.... Don't want to be disappointed
- TheMostDangerousLG
- Posts: 1545
- Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:25 am
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
I'm pretty sure I've heard that it's virtually simultaneous.ws81086n wrote:Does the score appear on your account on the website before the email or vice-versa...or is it simultaneous
I'm not stressing myself out by checking today; I assume you all will adequately freak out enough for me to go check if scores do come today.
If, of course, I'm taken by surprise while checking my email today (I'm an obsessive iPhone email checker), I will probably freak the %^&* out.
Last edited by TheMostDangerousLG on Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- OliveBC
- Posts: 490
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:41 am
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
I have my email open in another tab, and every single time I see "Inbox(1)" I literally have a miniature heart attack.
-
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:47 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
Don't the icons on the website turn from green to gray a certain short period of time before the scores start going out? So we should have a fair warning...
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 3:31 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
They do. Everyone posting about expecting an e-mail today just made me unnecessarily freak and think that scores were coming out. They're not. Everyone go home. I'm very disappointed in all of you.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- OliveBC
- Posts: 490
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:41 am
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
I honestly wouldn't be surprised by anything in the 167 to 173 range. (I was PTing 170-175ish) Similarly to you I'm hoping for 168+, if I hit 170 or better I will be ecstatic.bruin91 wrote:What was your target for Feb again? I'm hoping for a 168.OliveBC wrote:I know exactly how you feel. I've been thinking that for the past few days, but at the same time if it is bad I'd rather know now so I can start prepping for June....bruin91 wrote:I've reached the point that I don't want my score for a few more weeks.... Don't want to be disappointed
BTW, what 'icons' are you guys referring to?
-
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:47 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
"LSAT Documents" in the "LSAT Status" tab...you should see a bunch of green icons with a semi-circular arrow in them
- OliveBC
- Posts: 490
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:41 am
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
ws81086n wrote:"LSAT Documents" in the "LSAT Status" tab...you should see a bunch of green icons with a semi-circular arrow in them
ahhhh gotcha, thanks!
- jvincent11
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:38 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
SAME although my range was more like 167-173 but closer to 170. Does anyone else feel like if they knew their reading comp score they would basically know their total score?OliveBC wrote:I honestly wouldn't be surprised by anything in the 167 to 173 range. (I was PTing 170-175ish) Similarly to you I'm hoping for 168+, if I hit 170 or better I will be ecstatic.bruin91 wrote:What was your target for Feb again? I'm hoping for a 168.OliveBC wrote:I know exactly how you feel. I've been thinking that for the past few days, but at the same time if it is bad I'd rather know now so I can start prepping for June....bruin91 wrote:I've reached the point that I don't want my score for a few more weeks.... Don't want to be disappointed
BTW, what 'icons' are you guys referring to?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- OliveBC
- Posts: 490
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:41 am
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
jvincent11 wrote:
SAME although my range was more like 167-173 but closer to 170. Does anyone else feel like if they knew their reading comp score they would basically know their total score?
for me I'm less worried about RC more worried about LR, which is unfortunate since it is half the test

I think I went -0 LG, hopefully -2/3 RC (pretty much my usual, although I actually thought RC was pretty straightforward this time around)...but the LR, I just don't know. I felt good, but the questions I miss on LR are never the ones I thought were hard, always ones I just went too fast on/made dumb mistakes.
BUHHHHH the suspense is killing me!
-
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:47 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
+1 to RC score comment
- TheMostDangerousLG
- Posts: 1545
- Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:25 am
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
Re: RC comment. Usually that's the case, but LR was so weird for me this test that I don't even know anymore.
- jvincent11
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:38 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
I know what you mean. I know I got 1 wrong on LG and it's killing me bc it wasn't a particularly hard question but I think i got everything else right so im guessing -2. I'm with you about LR. For both sections combined I guessed on 1 question bc it was difficult and I skipped it and by the time I came back to it time ended. So I'd like to think I only missed 4 maximum but I could have made stupid mistakes as well bc that also happens to me. RC is a toss up. I felt confident after it, but I think that's the hardest section to predict. I think anywhere from 2-6 wrong.OliveBC wrote:jvincent11 wrote:
SAME although my range was more like 167-173 but closer to 170. Does anyone else feel like if they knew their reading comp score they would basically know their total score?
for me I'm less worried about RC more worried about LR, which is unfortunate since it is half the test![]()
I think I went -0 LG, hopefully -2/3 RC (pretty much my usual, although I actually thought RC was pretty straightforward this time around)...but the LR, I just don't know. I felt good, but the questions I miss on LR are never the ones I thought were hard, always ones I just went too fast on/made dumb mistakes.
BUHHHHH the suspense is killing me!
I took the Feb makeup FYI. Test seemed on the easier side. Very worried that it may have a sub 10 curve.
Waiting for this score has been one of the hardest things I've ever had to endure and I'm only half joking.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:47 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
Sub 10 curve is a really easy test. What did other people who took the version you took think? Regularly scheduled version was on the easy side too, but I really don't think it was easy enough to get into single digits. Too bad none of us will ever know.
- jvincent11
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:38 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
It was definitely easier than the December test which was -12.ws81086n wrote:Sub 10 curve is a really easy test. What did other people who took the version you took think? Regularly scheduled version was on the easy side too, but I really don't think it was easy enough to get into single digits. Too bad none of us will ever know.
My opinion. Games: easy. LR1: Easy. LR2: slightly above average difficulty. RC: Average.
Others have expressed that games were easy but maybe not as easy as some suggest and most people agree that RC was hard. I felt confident after RC but hearing that makes me doubt myself!
There hasn't been a -9 in a while, but the makeup was an old test so it's possible. I think there's no chance that it was -11.
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:07 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
i wrote october, december and february, and i will say that this one was probably the easiest....i would go -10 curve
- jvincent11
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:38 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
Does it make you nervous that October was -10?mtr12345 wrote:i wrote october, december and february, and i will say that this one was probably the easiest....i would go -10 curve
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login