The Official June 2015 Waiter's Thread (GREY DEY 7/1) Forum

cdotson2 · Post by **cdotson2** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 3:11 pm

drtamale wrote:
benwyatt wrote:
drtamale wrote:
They are not people I know personally, nor do I know who spivey is. I was on a conference call today with people I'd trust regarding this info.

You all have no reason to trust me. That's fine. Trust me I have plenty of reasons to really want scores today.
"I don't know them, but I trust them"

OOoooooookay.
If you knew who I'm talking about you'd trust them more than anyone here, I'd think.

Obama??

cub1014 · Post by **cub1014** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 3:11 pm

drtamale, can you give even a little more detail about the background of your sources?

placeholder · Post by **placeholder** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 3:11 pm

lol we get refernced http://captiongenerator.com/48292/LSAT- ... -arent-out

basedvulpes · Post by **basedvulpes** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 3:11 pm

Post removed.

basedvulpes · Post by **basedvulpes** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 3:12 pm

Post removed.

drtamale · Post by **drtamale** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 3:12 pm

Post removed...

Li'l Sebastian · Post by **Li'l Sebastian** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 3:13 pm

I'd like to thank Dr Texmex for making my morning prediction of today being the Blastening a dream come true.

lurker180 · Post by **lurker180** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 3:13 pm

basedvulpes wrote:Holy crap where did all these lurkers come from

Horde button.

basedvulpes · Post by **basedvulpes** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 3:13 pm

Post removed.

cdotson2 · Post by **cdotson2** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 3:13 pm

placeholder wrote:lol we get refernced http://captiongenerator.com/48292/LSAT- ... -arent-out

I saw that earlier but wasn't sure if someone had already posted it. explains exactly how I feel though.

BirdLawExpert · Post by **BirdLawExpert** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 3:13 pm

Post removed.

cdotson2 · Post by **cdotson2** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 3:14 pm

drtamale wrote:
cub1014 wrote:drtamale, can you give even a little more detail about the background of your sources?

I don't feel comfortable doing that at the moment. Really wish I could. Sorry.

Basically, take it or leave it guys. This is getting ridiculous. No sweat off my sack.

definitely Obama.

stressball2015 · Post by **stressball2015** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 3:14 pm

carterjo wrote:
stressball2015 wrote:
ruizdaw wrote:The real enemy is everyone with a 3,75 or higher applying to the same schools as us.
Don't worry about it, I have a 3.8 and I'm concerned about even cracking 165. Given you all are sweating bullets about not hitting a 174, I'd say you're pretty damn solid.
I am right there with you stressball. I have a 3.8; however, I would be ecstatic with a 165. Working 60 hours a week left little time for LSAT preparation.

I feel you, hence the "concerned" part that I didn't hit that score D:

placeholder · Post by **placeholder** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 3:14 pm

drtamale wrote:
placeholder wrote:
drtamale wrote:
placeholder wrote:what is your work when lsat score release date becomes somethign announced on a conference call? does Las Vegas place bets on release dates?

Wasn't a work call
i'm really confused. So this wasn't a work call but you were talking to people you dont know that well? So someone ccalled someone persumably they know which decided to make it a conference call when its not work related so strangers can listen in?

There was a reason for the call. It was scheduled. My current work has nothing to do with law.

So a scheduled call that wasn't work related needed to become a conference call even though you dont know them and (I stress) their info wasn't work related.

So i get a scheduled call that wasn't work related and I;m talking to this dude, and I go hey Drtamale you wanna listen to this stranger who has nothing to say about work

whacka · Post by **whacka** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 3:14 pm

Post removed.

cub1014 · Post by **cub1014** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 3:15 pm

drtamale wrote:
cub1014 wrote:drtamale, can you give even a little more detail about the background of your sources?

I don't feel comfortable doing that at the moment. Really wish I could. Sorry.

Basically, take it or leave it guys. This is getting ridiculous. No sweat off my sack.

Actually fair enough. I could see you could potentially get the information if you were talking to a law firm for some classified personal reason on a conference call, and the people who worked there had contacts at LSAC. So if you are being truthful, I could imagine that being the case.

Lillet71 · Post by **Lillet71** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 3:15 pm

mr tamale - no sarcasm intended, but why are you in this board? For reals...why???

Oskosh · Post by **Oskosh** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 3:15 pm

My concern is that last time I went -4 on LR (combined), and that this won't happen this time haha.

placeholder · Post by **placeholder** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 3:16 pm

hate to repost but i think it got lost in the shuffle

http://captiongenerator.com/48292/LSAT- ... -arent-out

benwyatt · Post by **benwyatt** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 3:17 pm

Post removed.

drtamale · Post by **drtamale** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 3:17 pm

Post removed...

Lillet71 · Post by **Lillet71** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 3:17 pm

whacka wrote:
basedvulpes wrote:Part of me misses the early days when it was like 5 of us regularly posting on this thread
+1

Sorry for the intrusion, but no one I know would understand what I'm going through unless they were also a waiter

Thank you for an awesome thread to get me through another wait

EnderWiggin · Post by **EnderWiggin** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 3:17 pm

basedvulpes wrote:Now it's just become a reality show

I don't mind tamale. Rather enjoying him do his dance and every1 ITT flipping their **** about it

basedvulpes · Post by **basedvulpes** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 3:18 pm

Post removed.

shump92 · Post by **shump92** » Wed Jul 01, 2015 3:18 pm

Since we all want to attack people for not having theories, what was the rationale for it being today? I get the reasoning for the guesses of yesterday and Monday, but as far as I have seen nothing provides great support for today over tomorrow.