retakers unite! especially the most bullshit test ever, colloquially reffered to as September 2016.Mikey wrote:I'm a retaker.dm1683 wrote:How many people here are retakers? I guess I'm just nervous cause everyone else is digging into the meat of LG and LR, asking about specific games and scenarios, and here I am nearly a month in and not even halfway through the LG Bible yet LOL. I've been going slow on purpose but I'm leagues behind everyone else.
Don't worry, I was in your situation a year ago, taking shit slow and not really doing much. Needless to say that it bit me in the ass, hence why I'm retaking.
The Official June 2017 Study Group Forum
-
dj9i27

- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
-
Mikey

- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
But Alex got a 179dj9i27 wrote:retakers unite! especially the most bullshit test ever, colloquially reffered to as September 2016.Mikey wrote:I'm a retaker.dm1683 wrote:How many people here are retakers? I guess I'm just nervous cause everyone else is digging into the meat of LG and LR, asking about specific games and scenarios, and here I am nearly a month in and not even halfway through the LG Bible yet LOL. I've been going slow on purpose but I'm leagues behind everyone else.
Don't worry, I was in your situation a year ago, taking shit slow and not really doing much. Needless to say that it bit me in the ass, hence why I'm retaking.
- PrezRand

- Posts: 1608
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:31 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
I think it's time I started timing myself on Logic Games. Gonna drill RC and LR for about 2 weeks and then I'll start timing everything. Hopefully by the 2nd week of March I can take PTs
- Colonel_funkadunk

- Posts: 3248
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
y was it so bad?dj9i27 wrote:retakers unite! especially the most bullshit test ever, colloquially reffered to as September 2016.Mikey wrote:I'm a retaker.dm1683 wrote:How many people here are retakers? I guess I'm just nervous cause everyone else is digging into the meat of LG and LR, asking about specific games and scenarios, and here I am nearly a month in and not even halfway through the LG Bible yet LOL. I've been going slow on purpose but I'm leagues behind everyone else.
Don't worry, I was in your situation a year ago, taking shit slow and not really doing much. Needless to say that it bit me in the ass, hence why I'm retaking.
-
dj9i27

- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
I was sick during the test which is 100% my fault; the RC was brutal (somehow pulled -2 tho, only damn accomplishment on the test) and the LG was just so off for me that day. Pretty much subjectively, that was the worst day.Colonel_funkadunk wrote:y was it so bad?dj9i27 wrote:retakers unite! especially the most bullshit test ever, colloquially reffered to as September 2016.Mikey wrote:I'm a retaker.dm1683 wrote:How many people here are retakers? I guess I'm just nervous cause everyone else is digging into the meat of LG and LR, asking about specific games and scenarios, and here I am nearly a month in and not even halfway through the LG Bible yet LOL. I've been going slow on purpose but I'm leagues behind everyone else.
Don't worry, I was in your situation a year ago, taking shit slow and not really doing much. Needless to say that it bit me in the ass, hence why I'm retaking.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
dj9i27

- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Nah dude we areMikey wrote:But Alex got a 179dj9i27 wrote:retakers unite! especially the most bullshit test ever, colloquially reffered to as September 2016.Mikey wrote:I'm a retaker.dm1683 wrote:How many people here are retakers? I guess I'm just nervous cause everyone else is digging into the meat of LG and LR, asking about specific games and scenarios, and here I am nearly a month in and not even halfway through the LG Bible yet LOL. I've been going slow on purpose but I'm leagues behind everyone else.
Don't worry, I was in your situation a year ago, taking shit slow and not really doing much. Needless to say that it bit me in the ass, hence why I'm retaking.so maybe we're just stupid bro

- Walliums

- Posts: 626
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2016 1:39 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Scored my best yet on a PT today - 167 on PT 60. Went -3 on RC which is the best I have ever done. Dropping the memory method and just drilling full RC sections has helped immensely. Messed up on some Logic Games though which is unusual. Now to drink
-
Mikey

- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Nice! What is your strategy with RC now since you dropped the memory method?Walliums wrote:Scored my best yet on a PT today - 167 on PT 60. Went -3 on RC which is the best I have ever done. Dropping the memory method and just drilling full RC sections has helped immensely. Messed up on some Logic Games though which is unusual. Now to drink
-
thewhalefish

- Posts: 91
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:58 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
What sections are you guys doing for drilling?? Sections as in from older PTs? It almost feels wasteful to be just doing random sections from PTs. Maybe it's fine if they're the older ones?Walliums wrote:Scored my best yet on a PT today - 167 on PT 60. Went -3 on RC which is the best I have ever done. Dropping the memory method and just drilling full RC sections has helped immensely. Messed up on some Logic Games though which is unusual. Now to drink
Let me know if I need to rephrase the question.
- Walliums

- Posts: 626
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2016 1:39 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
dj9i27 and I were talking about this a few pages back. It's just some very light notation, underlining here and there that stick out to me, boxing in definitions to come back to easily find. I feel like I'm really reading and paying attention to the passages now. The memory method helped really hone in on things but, I found I was reading the passages with the goal of being able to summarize each paragraph, rather than really read it. I felt like I was taking notes rather than digesting the thing. That's kind of mish mosh but, does it make sense?Mikey wrote:Nice! What is your strategy with RC now since you dropped the memory method?Walliums wrote:Scored my best yet on a PT today - 167 on PT 60. Went -3 on RC which is the best I have ever done. Dropping the memory method and just drilling full RC sections has helped immensely. Messed up on some Logic Games though which is unusual. Now to drink
- Walliums

- Posts: 626
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2016 1:39 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
For RC I knew I had issues with timing so I began drilling full sections starting with PT 1. In between PT 1 and 5 I have seen a ton of improvement, and according to 7Sage those early passages are supposed to be hard.thewhalefish wrote:What sections are you guys doing for drilling?? Sections as in from older PTs? It almost feels wasteful to be just doing random sections from PTs. Maybe it's fine if they're the older ones?Walliums wrote:Scored my best yet on a PT today - 167 on PT 60. Went -3 on RC which is the best I have ever done. Dropping the memory method and just drilling full RC sections has helped immensely. Messed up on some Logic Games though which is unusual. Now to drink
Let me know if I need to rephrase the question.
I don't really see an issue with drilling "random" sections from the earlier tests (1-35). It's important to keep track of what you've drilled (and your time, and the number of questions you got wrong, and why you got those questions wrong, etc) - I keep everything in a Google sheet.
-
thewhalefish

- Posts: 91
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:58 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Thanks, Walli! I'll start doing that tomorrow.
-
Mikey

- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Yeah I get you. I'm just like you, been using the memory since the summer and just recently switched to just reading and doing some minor circling and underlining and it helps! The MM did help a bit with memory though so it wasn't a total waste of time.Walliums wrote:dj9i27 and I were talking about this a few pages back. It's just some very light notation, underlining here and there that stick out to me, boxing in definitions to come back to easily find. I feel like I'm really reading and paying attention to the passages now. The memory method helped really hone in on things but, I found I was reading the passages with the goal of being able to summarize each paragraph, rather than really read it. I felt like I was taking notes rather than digesting the thing. That's kind of mish mosh but, does it make sense?Mikey wrote:Nice! What is your strategy with RC now since you dropped the memory method?Walliums wrote:Scored my best yet on a PT today - 167 on PT 60. Went -3 on RC which is the best I have ever done. Dropping the memory method and just drilling full RC sections has helped immensely. Messed up on some Logic Games though which is unusual. Now to drink
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Walliums

- Posts: 626
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2016 1:39 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
I felt like it was a good learning tool, had its benefits in practice. But not for use on the test.Mikey wrote:Yeah I get you. I'm just like you, been using the memory since the summer and just recently switched to just reading and doing some minor circling and underlining and it helps! The MM did help a bit with memory though so it wasn't a total waste of time.Walliums wrote:dj9i27 and I were talking about this a few pages back. It's just some very light notation, underlining here and there that stick out to me, boxing in definitions to come back to easily find. I feel like I'm really reading and paying attention to the passages now. The memory method helped really hone in on things but, I found I was reading the passages with the goal of being able to summarize each paragraph, rather than really read it. I felt like I was taking notes rather than digesting the thing. That's kind of mish mosh but, does it make sense?Mikey wrote:Nice! What is your strategy with RC now since you dropped the memory method?Walliums wrote:Scored my best yet on a PT today - 167 on PT 60. Went -3 on RC which is the best I have ever done. Dropping the memory method and just drilling full RC sections has helped immensely. Messed up on some Logic Games though which is unusual. Now to drink
- Walliums

- Posts: 626
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2016 1:39 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
One thing also, especially in RC, don't be afraid of skipping questions! You start to get into a time suck, you circle it and move on. Come back if you have remaining time.thewhalefish wrote:Thanks, Walli! I'll start doing that tomorrow.
- PrezRand

- Posts: 1608
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:31 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Currently going over PR, but I feel like I have the hang of it. Might just stop here after 15 Qs and wait until my first timed section to see if I still need to work on it
- Rupert Pupkin

- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Good advice! This time around, I am definitely going to document everything in an excel sheet for reference.. I didn't do this last time for September.Walliums wrote:For RC I knew I had issues with timing so I began drilling full sections starting with PT 1. In between PT 1 and 5 I have seen a ton of improvement, and according to 7Sage those early passages are supposed to be hard.thewhalefish wrote:What sections are you guys doing for drilling?? Sections as in from older PTs? It almost feels wasteful to be just doing random sections from PTs. Maybe it's fine if they're the older ones?Walliums wrote:Scored my best yet on a PT today - 167 on PT 60. Went -3 on RC which is the best I have ever done. Dropping the memory method and just drilling full RC sections has helped immensely. Messed up on some Logic Games though which is unusual. Now to drink
Let me know if I need to rephrase the question.
I don't really see an issue with drilling "random" sections from the earlier tests (1-35). It's important to keep track of what you've drilled (and your time, and the number of questions you got wrong, and why you got those questions wrong, etc) - I keep everything in a Google sheet.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
Legally Spears

- Posts: 19
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 9:18 am
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Just to double check, what are everyone's preferred methods for drilling LR in the post-Cambridge era?
DJ mentioned he likes to highlight the questions by type in the preptests, any other approaches? Or am I resigned to grinding out copies of the PTs until the end of my days...
DJ mentioned he likes to highlight the questions by type in the preptests, any other approaches? Or am I resigned to grinding out copies of the PTs until the end of my days...
-
Legally Spears

- Posts: 19
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 9:18 am
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Building on this, does anyone recommend the Powerscore workbooks?Legally Spears wrote:Just to double check, what are everyone's preferred methods for drilling LR in the post-Cambridge era?
DJ mentioned he likes to highlight the questions by type in the preptests, any other approaches? Or am I resigned to grinding out copies of the PTs until the end of my days...
-
Legally Spears

- Posts: 19
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 9:18 am
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Building on this, does anyone recommend the Powerscore workbooks?Legally Spears wrote:Just to double check, what are everyone's preferred methods for drilling LR in the post-Cambridge era?
DJ mentioned he likes to highlight the questions by type in the preptests, any other approaches? Or am I resigned to grinding out copies of the PTs until the end of my days...
- greatspirit

- Posts: 169
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 6:26 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
I have not started actively drilling. However, when I do, I plan on using Tests 1-50 for drilling/random sections, and tests 51-79 as my PT bucket.thewhalefish wrote:What sections are you guys doing for drilling?? Sections as in from older PTs? It almost feels wasteful to be just doing random sections from PTs. Maybe it's fine if they're the older ones?Walliums wrote:Scored my best yet on a PT today - 167 on PT 60. Went -3 on RC which is the best I have ever done. Dropping the memory method and just drilling full RC sections has helped immensely. Messed up on some Logic Games though which is unusual. Now to drink
Let me know if I need to rephrase the question.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- greatspirit

- Posts: 169
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 6:26 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Also, for a brief update...
My work ethic needs a restructuring. I studied for 4.5 hours last week, well below by 15-20 hour per-week target. I'm not working FT right now...so my only excuse is distraction/doing other important shit.
I'm aiming for a 170, but I need to be realistic with myself - I'm not studying at the clip I should be to get that score by June.
Not to sound like a whiner, but tips on how to start building up some momentum anyone?
My work ethic needs a restructuring. I studied for 4.5 hours last week, well below by 15-20 hour per-week target. I'm not working FT right now...so my only excuse is distraction/doing other important shit.
I'm aiming for a 170, but I need to be realistic with myself - I'm not studying at the clip I should be to get that score by June.
Not to sound like a whiner, but tips on how to start building up some momentum anyone?
-
Legally Spears

- Posts: 19
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 9:18 am
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
Have you read TLS' guide? He really influenced me. I try to think of the LSAT as this mountain I have to chip at day by day... I've also started to become vastly more disciplined. I've stopped drinking entirely, I only make time for my close friends and boyfriend, and I make sure to hit my goal of 4hrs of LSAT time everyday. Also, Pithypike's timeline has been helpful in keeping me honest and grounded in my time goals.greatspirit wrote:Also, for a brief update...
My work ethic needs a restructuring. I studied for 4.5 hours last week, well below by 15-20 hour per-week target. I'm not working FT right now...so my only excuse is distraction/doing other important shit.
I'm aiming for a 170, but I need to be realistic with myself - I'm not studying at the clip I should be to get that score by June.
Not to sound like a whiner, but tips on how to start building up some momentum anyone?
I definitely cut myself breaks and give myself rest days, and make sure to have ample snacks during study time, but other than that, waking up early, eating (mostly) healthy, exercise and discipline have been my friends. Avoid stressors, avoid temptation, avoid burnout. Good luck.
- Saylor1720

- Posts: 87
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
I bought the workbooks and they're useless. What is good from powerscore though is the "Logical Reasoning Question Type Training By Type". They're real questions from tests 1-20 organized by type "flaw, assumption" etc. It's really useful and takes away having to track down questions in certain tests.Legally Spears wrote:Building on this, does anyone recommend the Powerscore workbooks?Legally Spears wrote:Just to double check, what are everyone's preferred methods for drilling LR in the post-Cambridge era?
DJ mentioned he likes to highlight the questions by type in the preptests, any other approaches? Or am I resigned to grinding out copies of the PTs until the end of my days...
This one: https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/09826618 ... powerscore
-
Legally Spears

- Posts: 19
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 9:18 am
Re: The Official June 2017 Study Group
And you primarily used the above to drill for LR? Any other gems?Saylor1720 wrote:I bought the workbooks and they're useless. What is good from powerscore though is the "Logical Reasoning Question Type Training By Type". They're real questions from tests 1-20 organized by type "flaw, assumption" etc. It's really useful and takes away having to track down questions in certain tests.Legally Spears wrote:Building on this, does anyone recommend the Powerscore workbooks?Legally Spears wrote:Just to double check, what are everyone's preferred methods for drilling LR in the post-Cambridge era?
DJ mentioned he likes to highlight the questions by type in the preptests, any other approaches? Or am I resigned to grinding out copies of the PTs until the end of my days...
This one: https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/09826618 ... powerscore
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login