Dirigo wrote:Miss her. We've lost a good number of waiters.GreenTee wrote: Speaking of, where is unusual?
-Feb threadjustabitunusual wrote:Oh ok... well i don't want tlsing to interfere w studying, so i have been limiting my tls exposure...will try to check in here w you guys as I get more done.
Bro me too. My single best PT score was a 177 (def an outlier, avg is bt 172-174), but I went -1 LR, -0 RC (never happened again), and -5 LG. I usually make a stupid mistake in LG. I'm hoping to limit it to one, or none.monadologist wrote:-0/2 LR, -1/2 RC, -3/4 LG (I'm one of those dudes who just can't get -0 in LG, I've still hit the 170s but I always lose points in LG because it takes me 20 years to make an inference, if I see one at all)scandk wrote:What are you guys aiming for, by section? I mean, ideally, we'd -0 everything, but...
I'm shooting for
-0/1 LG
-3/4 LR
-3/4 RC
Assuming -11 curve, 172-175.
Ideally, if I have enough chi to go SS4, -0 LG, -3 LR, -2 RC on a -14 test for a 178. Right now I'll settle for super saiyan anything tho (over 170).
seems like our ranges are quite similar. best of luck!secadc11 wrote:Realistically, hoping:
-0/-1 LG
-4/-7 LR (I mean I would die of joy if I went -3 or less)
-2/-4 RC
You too! Good luck everyone! Less than 72 hours from now, we'll all be done... or at least close!scandk wrote:seems like our ranges are quite similar. best of luck!secadc11 wrote:Realistically, hoping:
-0/-1 LG
-4/-7 LR (I mean I would die of joy if I went -3 or less)
-2/-4 RC
Right now, the June thread is more active than we are (feb thread). LOLJgoods wrote:Dirigo wrote:Miss her. We've lost a good number of waiters.GreenTee wrote: Speaking of, where is unusual?-Feb threadjustabitunusual wrote:Oh ok... well i don't want tlsing to interfere w studying, so i have been limiting my tls exposure...will try to check in here w you guys as I get more done.
Serves you all right for leaving the Dec. crew. HMPH!nlee10 wrote:Right now, the June thread is more active than we are (feb thread). LOLJgoods wrote:Dirigo wrote:Miss her. We've lost a good number of waiters.GreenTee wrote: Speaking of, where is unusual?-Feb threadjustabitunusual wrote:Oh ok... well i don't want tlsing to interfere w studying, so i have been limiting my tls exposure...will try to check in here w you guys as I get more done.
The within the group ordering was weridShakawkaw wrote:It was Game 1 that threw me off. I got so mad I crumpled my paper up. Fourth game was very similar to one in the past. I forget which one.GreenTee wrote:Don't freak out over 72 game 4. I can see how it might have thrown people off on test day, but it's really not a difficult game. Just a bit unusual.monadologist wrote:Checkin in. PT72 today with full blind review. Gonna also drill LG PT 60-64. Good luck to everyone today! I heard that LG4 on PT72 is fun times, so that'll be interesting.
Speaking of, where is unusual?
Also, lol @ the -27 RC, GT. High five for illiteracy!
That's exactly what it was for me. I was staring at Question 1 for what felt like forever because I read the rules too quickly and assumed the sequencing applied cross-boards. LSAC is getting SO tricky in the post-70 era.unodostres wrote:The within the group ordering was werid
Oh god mist. Don't ever joke about a retake. I almost had a heart attack just reading that. I NEED MY LIFE BACK.mist4bison wrote:Maybe you'll join us?Shakawkaw wrote:Serves you all right for leaving the Dec. crew. HMPH!nlee10 wrote:Right now, the June thread is more active than we are (feb thread). LOL
Kidding. You won't need to do that after you pull a Shaq and, er, dunk the LSAT.
Overly cheesy whatever idgaf
If I have to retake, I'm definitely doing it in June. I need to get my life back for a few months.monadologist wrote:So, should we rewrite in Feb or June? haha jk
Dirigo wrote:We're meant to be.
I dunno man, LSAC txted me last night and she told me to expect mapping for game 1, circular table game for g 2, and to prepare for a hybrid game where a mauve velociraptor is trying to stain windows according to the colour of flower bouquets (that'll be game 3 and 4)santoki wrote:bros and sistos, im feeling good about 74. i texted lsac and she (lsac is a woman) told me itll be easier than 73, based on trends. lsat #s are down so she said shes gonna make it easier for us.
monadologist wrote:I dunno man, LSAC txted me last night and she told me to expect mapping for game 1, circular table game for g 2, and to prepare for a hybrid game where a mauve velociraptor is trying to stain windows according to the colour of flower bouquets (that'll be game 3 and 4)
GreenTee wrote:Dirigo wrote:We're meant to be.
