Feb Waiters: is TODAY the DAY? [New Poll] Forum
- jvincent11
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:38 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
I agree, it's a good time to have pain meds. All legally prescribed of course.
- Ambitious1
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:38 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
I am. Goal for February is 165 or higher. Realistically expect anything in 163-167 range. I took February (1st time) for the "experience" factor and that I believed I had a punchers chance of cracking 170. I will retake June..eventually want 170s or higher. I am a splitter, so with my GPA I would love UPenn or Michigan. An insane score like 173 or 174 would give me a chance at U-Chicago (dream school). If I can't crack 170, I'm out of the t-14. Everything for me is now riding on the lsat..sid.bahl wrote:Is anyone here applying for Fall 2013 admission? If so, what was your goal with the February 2013 LSAT? What schools are you looking at?
time to get to work

-
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 4:09 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
Im looking for anything north of 160- will be super happy if i break 163. id like to crack the 165 mark in June, and will be shocked if i did it this time around.
- jvincent11
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:38 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
So untrue. I believe you meant you are a reverse splitter - high GPA relative to LSAT. I say relative because a low LSAT score will keep you out of the T14, whereas a high LSAT score, such as a 164, which is 90th percentile, may also not be good enough, but is nonetheless a strong score and will make you competitive at other really good schools, just not T14. (i.e. Fordham, BC, USC, ND, Vanderbilt, GW, USC, etc.)Ambitious1 wrote: If I can't crack 170, I'm out of the t-14
With that being said, http://lawschoolnumbers.com/. Depending on your GPA, which I am assuming is 3.8+, I'm almost certain that a 169 will get you into one of Berkeley, NYU, Penn, Duke, UVA, and perhaps all of the above. A 168 will probably get you into one as well. A 167 should get you into Cornell and Georgetown, and a 166 will give you a chance as well, perhaps >50%. I would say 165 is the minimum to have a chance, unless you are an URM, then you still have a chance with lower LSAT scores. Also, if you are applying next cycle you will be amongst the first people to send in applications, which from what I understand is a HUGE advantage for reach schools, but not necessarily a disadvantage for schools at which you are at median or above.
- facile princeps
- Posts: 420
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 8:51 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
I did exactly what you did the first time around (Feb. 2012) re the "experience" factor, even down to the same expected score range. I scored in the mid 160s and became somewhat complacent. If I could do things over, I would have started prepping for June 2012. This Feb. LSAT was a last minute decision. I really wasn't prepared but I felt like I had nothing to lose since I had already secured some pretty decent acceptances. Hope you hit your target, man. Good luck!Ambitious1 wrote:I am. Goal for February is 165 or higher. Realistically expect anything in 163-167 range. I took February (1st time) for the "experience" factor and that I believed I had a punchers chance of cracking 170. I will retake June..eventually want 170s or higher. I am a splitter, so with my GPA I would love UPenn or Michigan. An insane score like 173 or 174 would give me a chance at U-Chicago (dream school). If I can't crack 170, I'm out of the t-14. Everything for me is now riding on the lsat..sid.bahl wrote:Is anyone here applying for Fall 2013 admission? If so, what was your goal with the February 2013 LSAT? What schools are you looking at?
time to get to work
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- chuckbass
- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
I'm applying next fall, as I'm just a junior in undergrad at the moment. I wouldn't be surprised with a score from 166-176, but I'm really just hoping for a 170. I figured if I get that now I can just chill out and enjoy the rest of undergrad, and if not I can retake in June/October. Shooting for Penn/NYU/Columbia, so hopefully medians keep dropping and less and less people take the LSAT for the next cycle!
- chuckbass
- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
And at this point, every email I get the first thing I think of is to look if it's from LSAC.
- jvincent11
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:38 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
Every word of that applies exactly to me as well. Although I graduated in May 2012 so I really don't want to wait another year. Hopefully we all killed it. Felt so confident after the test, but the more I think about it, the more I have doubts.scotth724 wrote: I wouldn't be surprised with a score from 166-176, but I'm really just hoping for a 170. I figured if I get that now I can just chill out and enjoy the rest of undergrad, and if not I can retake in June/October. Shooting for Penn/NYU/Columbia, so hopefully medians keep dropping and less and less people take the LSAT for the next cycle!
- Ambitious1
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:38 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
I have an unremarkable GPA. High 3.40s right now, will be low 3.40s after this final semester. I am a splitter in the ordinary sense. For t-14, I certainly need a 170 or above.jvincent11 wrote:
I am assuming is 3.8+
- Ambitious1
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:38 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
Appreciate it man, good luck to you as well! Are you thinking about retaking in June? I feel like with our score range, with 3 more months of prep 170s is attainable.facile princeps wrote:I did exactly what you did the first time around (Feb. 2012) re the "experience" factor, even down to the same expected score range. I scored in the mid 160s and became somewhat complacent. If I could do things over, I would have started prepping for June 2012. This Feb. LSAT was a last minute decision. I really wasn't prepared but I felt like I had nothing to lose since I had already secured some pretty decent acceptances. Hope you hit your target, man. Good luck!Ambitious1 wrote:I am. Goal for February is 165 or higher. Realistically expect anything in 163-167 range. I took February (1st time) for the "experience" factor and that I believed I had a punchers chance of cracking 170. I will retake June..eventually want 170s or higher. I am a splitter, so with my GPA I would love UPenn or Michigan. An insane score like 173 or 174 would give me a chance at U-Chicago (dream school). If I can't crack 170, I'm out of the t-14. Everything for me is now riding on the lsat..sid.bahl wrote:Is anyone here applying for Fall 2013 admission? If so, what was your goal with the February 2013 LSAT? What schools are you looking at?
time to get to work
- jvincent11
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:38 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
Gotcha. Then in that case I think a 169 will give you a shot at Cornell and Georgetown, especially applying very early in the cycle. How big of a shot? that I don't know. But last year Georgetown's median was 169, and Cornell 167. Those numbers could drop again this year. High LSATs are more valuable than ever before. But hey the way I look at it is every point matters no matter what. Higher score, more scholarship $. For example, if you want to work in NY, so if you miss out on T14, scholarship to Fordham isn't too shabby. I think the schools outside the T14 will really struggle to get high LSAT scorers and will have no choice but to cough up the dough.Ambitious1 wrote:I have an unremarkable GPA. High 3.40s right now, will be low 3.40s after this final semester. I am a splitter in the ordinary sense. For t-14, I certainly need a 170 or above.jvincent11 wrote:
I am assuming is 3.8+
-
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 6:37 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
Having a job in front of a computer with pending LSAT scores is simply the worst.
- chuckbass
- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
I'm sure we all killed it.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- facile princeps
- Posts: 420
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 8:51 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
Nah. I missed that boat already (I'm definitely enrolling in the fall). To decode a post I made above, my goal in deciding to retake at the last minute was either or all of an NYU/Columbia scholly and a Yale acceptance. I feel like I scored at or below my first try, though. So I doubt I'll get any of those, but we'll see how it goes from here.Ambitious1 wrote:Appreciate it man, good luck to you as well! Are you thinking about retaking in June? I feel like with our score range, with 3 more months of prep 170s is attainable.facile princeps wrote:I did exactly what you did the first time around (Feb. 2012) re the "experience" factor, even down to the same expected score range. I scored in the mid 160s and became somewhat complacent. If I could do things over, I would have started prepping for June 2012. This Feb. LSAT was a last minute decision. I really wasn't prepared but I felt like I had nothing to lose since I had already secured some pretty decent acceptances. Hope you hit your target, man. Good luck!Ambitious1 wrote:I am. Goal for February is 165 or higher. Realistically expect anything in 163-167 range. I took February (1st time) for the "experience" factor and that I believed I had a punchers chance of cracking 170. I will retake June..eventually want 170s or higher. I am a splitter, so with my GPA I would love UPenn or Michigan. An insane score like 173 or 174 would give me a chance at U-Chicago (dream school). If I can't crack 170, I'm out of the t-14. Everything for me is now riding on the lsat..sid.bahl wrote:Is anyone here applying for Fall 2013 admission? If so, what was your goal with the February 2013 LSAT? What schools are you looking at?
time to get to work
-
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:47 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
scotth724 wrote:I'm sure we all killed it.
- OliveBC
- Posts: 490
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:41 am
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
This is basically the exact same as my situation, except that I'm really not very picky about the school, obviously I have preferences haha, but really I just want t14 with the most scholarship money I can getscotth724 wrote:I'm applying next fall, as I'm just a junior in undergrad at the moment. I wouldn't be surprised with a score from 166-176, but I'm really just hoping for a 170. I figured if I get that now I can just chill out and enjoy the rest of undergrad, and if not I can retake in June/October. Shooting for Penn/NYU/Columbia, so hopefully medians keep dropping and less and less people take the LSAT for the next cycle!

-
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 4:18 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
.
Last edited by Holynorth on Thu Sep 05, 2013 10:32 am, edited 2 times in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- andy261
- Posts: 405
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 5:50 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
+1illiniguy1551 wrote:Having a job in front of a computer with pending LSAT scores is simply the worst.
- jvincent11
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:38 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
There are more successful lawyers with sub 165 scores than 165+. But good luck. I PT'd 170+ though I also have a pessimistic view and think I will end up in the mid 160s. One thing is for sure, this grueling wait is coming to an end!Holynorth wrote:Went in pting and expecting 170-172, a 168 was a pessimistic score in case of a blunder. I'd be happy to get a 164 or 165 after missing every question on the last RC passage. My goal is to matriculate this fall. However, I have one more retake left and will use it this summer. Depending on how I do there (aiming for a 172-175, I may have to rethink my future).
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:07 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
really hope that tomorrow is the day!
-
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:47 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
That would be awesome, but someone else on the previous page said that they had just gotten a form requesting a clarification of their ss#, so that doesn't bode well for us.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 437
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:23 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
The longer we have to wait, the worse I think I did. Pressure + stress = ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh ugh
- OliveBC
- Posts: 490
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:41 am
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
+1Instinctive wrote:The longer we have to wait, the worse I think I did. Pressure + stress = ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh ugh
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 9:09 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
Not to be a debbie downer but im pretty sure this is because there are a lot more sub 165 scores than 165+. I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say the ratio of successful lawyers in the pool of <165 score is lower than >165, aka its "more likely" youll be succesful with a 165+jvincent11 wrote:
There are more successful lawyers with sub 165 scores than 165+. But good luck.
-
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:54 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
That is the most logically fallacious way to look at LSAT scores I have ever heard. There may be more successful lawyers with sub 165 scores than 165+ but that is only because there are so many MORE TOTAL lawyers with sub 165 lawyers. If you look at a proportion, I would be willing to bet my LSAT score that a higher PROPORTION of 165+ lawyers are successful.jvincent11 wrote:There are more successful lawyers with sub 165 scores than 165+. But good luck. I PT'd 170+ though I also have a pessimistic view and think I will end up in the mid 160s. One thing is for sure, this grueling wait is coming to an end!Holynorth wrote:Went in pting and expecting 170-172, a 168 was a pessimistic score in case of a blunder. I'd be happy to get a 164 or 165 after missing every question on the last RC passage. My goal is to matriculate this fall. However, I have one more retake left and will use it this summer. Depending on how I do there (aiming for a 172-175, I may have to rethink my future).
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login