Feb Waiters: is TODAY the DAY? [New Poll] Forum
- jvincent11

- Posts: 207
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:38 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
I agree, it's a good time to have pain meds. All legally prescribed of course.
- Ambitious1

- Posts: 120
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:38 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
I am. Goal for February is 165 or higher. Realistically expect anything in 163-167 range. I took February (1st time) for the "experience" factor and that I believed I had a punchers chance of cracking 170. I will retake June..eventually want 170s or higher. I am a splitter, so with my GPA I would love UPenn or Michigan. An insane score like 173 or 174 would give me a chance at U-Chicago (dream school). If I can't crack 170, I'm out of the t-14. Everything for me is now riding on the lsat..sid.bahl wrote:Is anyone here applying for Fall 2013 admission? If so, what was your goal with the February 2013 LSAT? What schools are you looking at?
time to get to work
-
tpfennin

- Posts: 86
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 4:09 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
Im looking for anything north of 160- will be super happy if i break 163. id like to crack the 165 mark in June, and will be shocked if i did it this time around.
- jvincent11

- Posts: 207
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:38 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
So untrue. I believe you meant you are a reverse splitter - high GPA relative to LSAT. I say relative because a low LSAT score will keep you out of the T14, whereas a high LSAT score, such as a 164, which is 90th percentile, may also not be good enough, but is nonetheless a strong score and will make you competitive at other really good schools, just not T14. (i.e. Fordham, BC, USC, ND, Vanderbilt, GW, USC, etc.)Ambitious1 wrote: If I can't crack 170, I'm out of the t-14
With that being said, http://lawschoolnumbers.com/. Depending on your GPA, which I am assuming is 3.8+, I'm almost certain that a 169 will get you into one of Berkeley, NYU, Penn, Duke, UVA, and perhaps all of the above. A 168 will probably get you into one as well. A 167 should get you into Cornell and Georgetown, and a 166 will give you a chance as well, perhaps >50%. I would say 165 is the minimum to have a chance, unless you are an URM, then you still have a chance with lower LSAT scores. Also, if you are applying next cycle you will be amongst the first people to send in applications, which from what I understand is a HUGE advantage for reach schools, but not necessarily a disadvantage for schools at which you are at median or above.
- facile princeps

- Posts: 420
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 8:51 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
I did exactly what you did the first time around (Feb. 2012) re the "experience" factor, even down to the same expected score range. I scored in the mid 160s and became somewhat complacent. If I could do things over, I would have started prepping for June 2012. This Feb. LSAT was a last minute decision. I really wasn't prepared but I felt like I had nothing to lose since I had already secured some pretty decent acceptances. Hope you hit your target, man. Good luck!Ambitious1 wrote:I am. Goal for February is 165 or higher. Realistically expect anything in 163-167 range. I took February (1st time) for the "experience" factor and that I believed I had a punchers chance of cracking 170. I will retake June..eventually want 170s or higher. I am a splitter, so with my GPA I would love UPenn or Michigan. An insane score like 173 or 174 would give me a chance at U-Chicago (dream school). If I can't crack 170, I'm out of the t-14. Everything for me is now riding on the lsat..sid.bahl wrote:Is anyone here applying for Fall 2013 admission? If so, what was your goal with the February 2013 LSAT? What schools are you looking at?
time to get to work
- chuckbass

- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
I'm applying next fall, as I'm just a junior in undergrad at the moment. I wouldn't be surprised with a score from 166-176, but I'm really just hoping for a 170. I figured if I get that now I can just chill out and enjoy the rest of undergrad, and if not I can retake in June/October. Shooting for Penn/NYU/Columbia, so hopefully medians keep dropping and less and less people take the LSAT for the next cycle!
- chuckbass

- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
And at this point, every email I get the first thing I think of is to look if it's from LSAC.
- jvincent11

- Posts: 207
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:38 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
Every word of that applies exactly to me as well. Although I graduated in May 2012 so I really don't want to wait another year. Hopefully we all killed it. Felt so confident after the test, but the more I think about it, the more I have doubts.scotth724 wrote: I wouldn't be surprised with a score from 166-176, but I'm really just hoping for a 170. I figured if I get that now I can just chill out and enjoy the rest of undergrad, and if not I can retake in June/October. Shooting for Penn/NYU/Columbia, so hopefully medians keep dropping and less and less people take the LSAT for the next cycle!
- Ambitious1

- Posts: 120
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:38 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
I have an unremarkable GPA. High 3.40s right now, will be low 3.40s after this final semester. I am a splitter in the ordinary sense. For t-14, I certainly need a 170 or above.jvincent11 wrote:
I am assuming is 3.8+
- Ambitious1

- Posts: 120
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:38 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
Appreciate it man, good luck to you as well! Are you thinking about retaking in June? I feel like with our score range, with 3 more months of prep 170s is attainable.facile princeps wrote:I did exactly what you did the first time around (Feb. 2012) re the "experience" factor, even down to the same expected score range. I scored in the mid 160s and became somewhat complacent. If I could do things over, I would have started prepping for June 2012. This Feb. LSAT was a last minute decision. I really wasn't prepared but I felt like I had nothing to lose since I had already secured some pretty decent acceptances. Hope you hit your target, man. Good luck!Ambitious1 wrote:I am. Goal for February is 165 or higher. Realistically expect anything in 163-167 range. I took February (1st time) for the "experience" factor and that I believed I had a punchers chance of cracking 170. I will retake June..eventually want 170s or higher. I am a splitter, so with my GPA I would love UPenn or Michigan. An insane score like 173 or 174 would give me a chance at U-Chicago (dream school). If I can't crack 170, I'm out of the t-14. Everything for me is now riding on the lsat..sid.bahl wrote:Is anyone here applying for Fall 2013 admission? If so, what was your goal with the February 2013 LSAT? What schools are you looking at?
time to get to work
- jvincent11

- Posts: 207
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:38 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
Gotcha. Then in that case I think a 169 will give you a shot at Cornell and Georgetown, especially applying very early in the cycle. How big of a shot? that I don't know. But last year Georgetown's median was 169, and Cornell 167. Those numbers could drop again this year. High LSATs are more valuable than ever before. But hey the way I look at it is every point matters no matter what. Higher score, more scholarship $. For example, if you want to work in NY, so if you miss out on T14, scholarship to Fordham isn't too shabby. I think the schools outside the T14 will really struggle to get high LSAT scorers and will have no choice but to cough up the dough.Ambitious1 wrote:I have an unremarkable GPA. High 3.40s right now, will be low 3.40s after this final semester. I am a splitter in the ordinary sense. For t-14, I certainly need a 170 or above.jvincent11 wrote:
I am assuming is 3.8+
-
illiniguy1551

- Posts: 172
- Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 6:37 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
Having a job in front of a computer with pending LSAT scores is simply the worst.
- chuckbass

- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
I'm sure we all killed it.
- facile princeps

- Posts: 420
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 8:51 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
Nah. I missed that boat already (I'm definitely enrolling in the fall). To decode a post I made above, my goal in deciding to retake at the last minute was either or all of an NYU/Columbia scholly and a Yale acceptance. I feel like I scored at or below my first try, though. So I doubt I'll get any of those, but we'll see how it goes from here.Ambitious1 wrote:Appreciate it man, good luck to you as well! Are you thinking about retaking in June? I feel like with our score range, with 3 more months of prep 170s is attainable.facile princeps wrote:I did exactly what you did the first time around (Feb. 2012) re the "experience" factor, even down to the same expected score range. I scored in the mid 160s and became somewhat complacent. If I could do things over, I would have started prepping for June 2012. This Feb. LSAT was a last minute decision. I really wasn't prepared but I felt like I had nothing to lose since I had already secured some pretty decent acceptances. Hope you hit your target, man. Good luck!Ambitious1 wrote:I am. Goal for February is 165 or higher. Realistically expect anything in 163-167 range. I took February (1st time) for the "experience" factor and that I believed I had a punchers chance of cracking 170. I will retake June..eventually want 170s or higher. I am a splitter, so with my GPA I would love UPenn or Michigan. An insane score like 173 or 174 would give me a chance at U-Chicago (dream school). If I can't crack 170, I'm out of the t-14. Everything for me is now riding on the lsat..sid.bahl wrote:Is anyone here applying for Fall 2013 admission? If so, what was your goal with the February 2013 LSAT? What schools are you looking at?
time to get to work
-
ws81086n

- Posts: 313
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:47 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
scotth724 wrote:I'm sure we all killed it.
- OliveBC

- Posts: 490
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:41 am
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
This is basically the exact same as my situation, except that I'm really not very picky about the school, obviously I have preferences haha, but really I just want t14 with the most scholarship money I can getscotth724 wrote:I'm applying next fall, as I'm just a junior in undergrad at the moment. I wouldn't be surprised with a score from 166-176, but I'm really just hoping for a 170. I figured if I get that now I can just chill out and enjoy the rest of undergrad, and if not I can retake in June/October. Shooting for Penn/NYU/Columbia, so hopefully medians keep dropping and less and less people take the LSAT for the next cycle!
-
Holynorth

- Posts: 136
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 4:18 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
.
Last edited by Holynorth on Thu Sep 05, 2013 10:32 am, edited 2 times in total.
- andy261

- Posts: 405
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 5:50 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
+1illiniguy1551 wrote:Having a job in front of a computer with pending LSAT scores is simply the worst.
- jvincent11

- Posts: 207
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:38 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
There are more successful lawyers with sub 165 scores than 165+. But good luck. I PT'd 170+ though I also have a pessimistic view and think I will end up in the mid 160s. One thing is for sure, this grueling wait is coming to an end!Holynorth wrote:Went in pting and expecting 170-172, a 168 was a pessimistic score in case of a blunder. I'd be happy to get a 164 or 165 after missing every question on the last RC passage. My goal is to matriculate this fall. However, I have one more retake left and will use it this summer. Depending on how I do there (aiming for a 172-175, I may have to rethink my future).
-
mtr12345

- Posts: 48
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:07 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
really hope that tomorrow is the day!
-
ws81086n

- Posts: 313
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:47 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
That would be awesome, but someone else on the previous page said that they had just gotten a form requesting a clarification of their ss#, so that doesn't bode well for us.
-
Instinctive

- Posts: 437
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:23 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
The longer we have to wait, the worse I think I did. Pressure + stress = ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh ugh
- OliveBC

- Posts: 490
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:41 am
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
+1Instinctive wrote:The longer we have to wait, the worse I think I did. Pressure + stress = ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh ugh
-
mrscrouge

- Posts: 8
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 9:09 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
Not to be a debbie downer but im pretty sure this is because there are a lot more sub 165 scores than 165+. I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say the ratio of successful lawyers in the pool of <165 score is lower than >165, aka its "more likely" youll be succesful with a 165+jvincent11 wrote:
There are more successful lawyers with sub 165 scores than 165+. But good luck.
-
jwg6x6

- Posts: 62
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:54 pm
Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]
That is the most logically fallacious way to look at LSAT scores I have ever heard. There may be more successful lawyers with sub 165 scores than 165+ but that is only because there are so many MORE TOTAL lawyers with sub 165 lawyers. If you look at a proportion, I would be willing to bet my LSAT score that a higher PROPORTION of 165+ lawyers are successful.jvincent11 wrote:There are more successful lawyers with sub 165 scores than 165+. But good luck. I PT'd 170+ though I also have a pessimistic view and think I will end up in the mid 160s. One thing is for sure, this grueling wait is coming to an end!Holynorth wrote:Went in pting and expecting 170-172, a 168 was a pessimistic score in case of a blunder. I'd be happy to get a 164 or 165 after missing every question on the last RC passage. My goal is to matriculate this fall. However, I have one more retake left and will use it this summer. Depending on how I do there (aiming for a 172-175, I may have to rethink my future).