
DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS Forum
-
- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
- Bravo
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2014 2:33 pm
Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS
Lovepink,
I can answer your question solely based off of what mine looks like though I do recommend calling LSAC if you have any questions. It appears that he wrote the wrong number into the "test form" box. It is supposed to be a different number from the one that he bubbled into the test serial book #. The number that he was supposed to write in the test form box should have matched the number number that you see directly under the disclosure book section on LSAC.
I don't imagine this mistake would have impacted his score though. LSAC probably picked up on his mistake because the numbers aren't supposed to be the same and this has probably happened to people before. I could see this happening due to nerves on test day and he probably just didn't notice he was looking at the wrong portion of the test booklet to find the form #.
Again, if you are concerned this could have caused any problems with his scoring I would not hesitate to call LSAC.
Hope this helps.
ETA: scooped by Rigo. I agree with him.
I can answer your question solely based off of what mine looks like though I do recommend calling LSAC if you have any questions. It appears that he wrote the wrong number into the "test form" box. It is supposed to be a different number from the one that he bubbled into the test serial book #. The number that he was supposed to write in the test form box should have matched the number number that you see directly under the disclosure book section on LSAC.
I don't imagine this mistake would have impacted his score though. LSAC probably picked up on his mistake because the numbers aren't supposed to be the same and this has probably happened to people before. I could see this happening due to nerves on test day and he probably just didn't notice he was looking at the wrong portion of the test booklet to find the form #.
Again, if you are concerned this could have caused any problems with his scoring I would not hesitate to call LSAC.
Hope this helps.
ETA: scooped by Rigo. I agree with him.
- flash21
- Posts: 1536
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 8:56 pm
Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS
Can someone give me some sort of encouragement.. 157 from mostly 161's PT's which I guess isn't really that crazy of a drop but I had one of my worst RC performances ever and a bit of a melt down on GAME FUCKING ONE of the LG section because of nerves (my first section). Literally couldn't draw out the rules for 3-4 minutes, keep in mind this was a simple sequencing game. Ended up getting first three questions wrong of that game lol.
The prospect of studying again with a full course load semester coming at me is so daunting. I don't even think I can truly study for it this semester, will try to keep the rust somewhat off until graduation in April.
Someone tell me everything is going to be OK.....
The prospect of studying again with a full course load semester coming at me is so daunting. I don't even think I can truly study for it this semester, will try to keep the rust somewhat off until graduation in April.
Someone tell me everything is going to be OK.....
-
- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2015 6:32 pm
Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS
Thanks sooooooooo much! I sent them an email, as per the instructions given. There's a number to contact them?!Bravo wrote:Lovepink,
I can answer your question solely based off of what mine looks like though I do recommend calling LSAC if you have any questions. It appears that he wrote the wrong number into the "test form" box. It is supposed to be a different number from the one that he bubbled into the test serial book #. The number that he was supposed to write in the test form box should have matched the number number that you see directly under the disclosure book section on LSAC.
I don't imagine this mistake would have impacted his score though. LSAC probably picked up on his mistake because the numbers aren't supposed to be the same and this has probably happened to people before. I could see this happening due to nerves on test day and he probably just didn't notice he was looking at the wrong portion of the test booklet to find the form #.
Again, if you are concerned this could have caused any problems with his scoring I would not hesitate to call LSAC.
Hope this helps.
ETA: scooped by Rigo. I agree with him.
@Rigo and Yeezus- He took wayyy more than 10 practice tests. Just 10+ that I, myself, proctored and his PS course. I''m a teacher so proctoring is something I do pretty darn often. His lowest PT score was 147, which was what he took cold turkey without prepping. After prep, he was averaging a lot higher (I believe 158ish). His score was in the 120s

Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- flash21
- Posts: 1536
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 8:56 pm
Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS
Thanks so much this actually helps a lot. Hope you do well on your re-take, 167 is very good too.
Last edited by flash21 on Sat Jan 03, 2015 2:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2014 2:30 pm
Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS
Everything is going to be okayflash21 wrote:Can someone give me some sort of encouragement.. 157 from mostly 161's PT's which I guess isn't really that crazy of a drop but I had one of my worst RC performances ever and a bit of a melt down on GAME FUCKING ONE of the LG section because of nerves (my first section). Literally couldn't draw out the rules for 3-4 minutes, keep in mind this was a simple sequencing game. Ended up getting first three questions wrong of that game lol.
The prospect of studying again with a full course load semester coming at me is so daunting. I don't even think I can truly study for it this semester, will try to keep the rust somewhat off until graduation in April.
Someone tell me everything is going to be OK.....

I score -6 from my highest PT, and just under my comfort zone for the school I'm applying to so a re-write is inevitable.
I work full-time as well as manage a full-time course load. I'm going to re-write in the fall, and start getting back on the horse in a couple of weeks. Take is slow and easy for your last term then go hard in the summer for your next write

It's going to suck, but at the end of the day it's going to be worth it.
I thought I read somewhere that you're from Canada? If I'm right, where are you gunning for? (I'm Canadian too)
-
- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
- flash21
- Posts: 1536
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 8:56 pm
Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS
kait- wrote:Everything is going to be okayflash21 wrote:Can someone give me some sort of encouragement.. 157 from mostly 161's PT's which I guess isn't really that crazy of a drop but I had one of my worst RC performances ever and a bit of a melt down on GAME FUCKING ONE of the LG section because of nerves (my first section). Literally couldn't draw out the rules for 3-4 minutes, keep in mind this was a simple sequencing game. Ended up getting first three questions wrong of that game lol.
The prospect of studying again with a full course load semester coming at me is so daunting. I don't even think I can truly study for it this semester, will try to keep the rust somewhat off until graduation in April.
Someone tell me everything is going to be OK.....
I score -6 from my highest PT, and just under my comfort zone for the school I'm applying to so a re-write is inevitable.
I work full-time as well as manage a full-time course load. I'm going to re-write in the fall, and start getting back on the horse in a couple of weeks. Take is slow and easy for your last term then go hard in the summer for your next write![]()
It's going to suck, but at the end of the day it's going to be worth it.
I thought I read somewhere that you're from Canada? If I'm right, where are you gunning for? (I'm Canadian too)
I'd like to go to windsor/queens/dalhousie. what about you?
- flash21
- Posts: 1536
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 8:56 pm
Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS
man it was such a bad meltdown. I needed 5 more questions for my goal of 160 .. so crappy. I have no excuse for my RC performance, but I know I never do THAT badly.Dirigo wrote:Lulz, now I'm reconsidering your potential after your RC fail, flash.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
-
- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2014 2:30 pm
Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS
Alberta, Calgary or Victoria.flash21 wrote: I'd like to go to windsor/queens/dalhousie. what about you?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- flash21
- Posts: 1536
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 8:56 pm
Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS
Dirigo sorry.
Kait - good luck!
Grey as for the U of T I didn't even apply there I said screw it. Thought they were super numbers driven, did they change their admissions up?
Kait - good luck!
Grey as for the U of T I didn't even apply there I said screw it. Thought they were super numbers driven, did they change their admissions up?
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2014 2:30 pm
Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS
You too! Keep your name in the hat for your choices, they may just take you with a 158flash21 wrote:Dirigo sorry.
Kait - good luck!
Grey as for the U of T I didn't even apply there I said screw it. Thought they were super numbers driven, did they change their admissions up?

- flash21
- Posts: 1536
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 8:56 pm
Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS
thanks, not banking on it, but Ontario applications are already submitted so I've gotta just wait now anyhowkait- wrote:You too! Keep your name in the hat for your choices, they may just take you with a 158flash21 wrote:Dirigo sorry.
Kait - good luck!
Grey as for the U of T I didn't even apply there I said screw it. Thought they were super numbers driven, did they change their admissions up?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- flash21
- Posts: 1536
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 8:56 pm
Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS
smccgrey wrote:They used to be, but they changed it up about two years ago. Now the PS and softs actually count a LOT. It's super holistic.flash21 wrote:Dirigo sorry.
Kait - good luck!
Grey as for the U of T I didn't even apply there I said screw it. Thought they were super numbers driven, did they change their admissions up?
Hmm thats interesting. I had a prof look at my PS before submitted and she said it was pretty strong. I feel like Queens will reject me right away but we will see.
- Bigfish41
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS
yo Flash, I'll be retaking as well for the third fuckn time... I was PTING high 160s (169/170), ended up with a 160. I went -7 on LG and -8 on RC sooo were almost on the same boat. Don't be discouraged homes it will all work out at the end
-
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2014 8:32 pm
Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS
Ontario law school applicant here. While the LSAT is not as highly valued in Canada as it is in the U.S., you still need a 160+ to be competitive. Getting into U of T with a 158 is definitely not the norm, even with their new policy. I spoke with the dean of admissions on a few occasions and although they are attempting to increase the diversity of their class, they still want to maintain their academic standards- median GPA of 3.8 and 167 LSAT score.
-
- Posts: 4102
- Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:04 am
Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS
why dont you just sit the cycle out? Are you talking about Texas or Tennessee? Because even with a 161 you probably wouldnt get in to texasflash21 wrote:Dirigo sorry.
Kait - good luck!
Grey as for the U of T I didn't even apply there I said screw it. Thought they were super numbers driven, did they change their admissions up?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login